• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I'm the King of the Castle" - In her after word, the writer talks about "the evil - for I think I evil-of Hooper". What do you think the novel says about the nature of evil in people?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I'm the King of the Castle" Qn: In her after word, the writer talks about "the evil - for I think I evil-of Hooper". What do you think the novel says about the nature of evil in people? In my perspective, I do not believe that people are born evil. "Evil" is undisputedly an arbitrary term whereby different people have different scope of what evil is. Susan Hill's definition of "evil" is that of Hooper -being sadistic and afflicting harm in others, as seen in Hooper. Yet, I feel that Hill's definition of "evil" is rather cynical and biased. Hill should not even relate Hooper to "evil" in the first place, as the child is still growing up and does not know how to differentiate between good and bad, and the fact that he does not receive any love and care sort of make him an "emotionless" person. Thus purely describing him as evil is somewhat biased. ...read more.

Middle

Hooper's hostile attitude towards Kingshaw indeed makes readers feel indignant. However, the crucial point here, which I feel, is why Hooper is so mean towards Kingshaw. It is a fact that all living beings need companionship. Hooper's cruelty towards Kingshaw could be a way he shows affection. Well, we never know for sure how some people choose to show affection. And cruelty could be how Hooper chooses to show. Furthermore, Hooper has never ever experienced the true feeling of love and care. So most probably, he doesn't know anything about love. So, that explains why he thinks cruelty is a form of affection. Taking for instance the case of ailing pets. Veterinarians and pet lovers, in a bid to stop their precious pets from suffering more pain, put them to sleep. This, irrefutable, is a cruel thing, but it is a way pet lover show their affection towards their pets. Now, are their actions really evil and inhumane? ...read more.

Conclusion

Critics have commented on Kingshaw as having "natural goodness". Now, the question is, if people are born evil, then why is Kingshaw still so kind? Kingshaw has been inundated with taunts and torments from Hooper. Yet, there is still this tinge of kindness inside him that made him remain good right from the start, albeit he did harbour some ill intentions of harming Hooper initially ("had only to move his hand...so that he would topple through the well of the staircase", chapter 2). So, if people were to born evil, then, why is Kingshaw still benevolent? Therefore, my motion, that people are not born evil, is further reinforced here. In conclusion, I'd like to state that it is nurture, not nature, that made Hooper evil, and that people are certainly not born evil. Perhaps one simple analogy one to reinforce my point is that when an adopted child commits a crime, the ones he would blame are definitely his foster parents and not his natural parents. Why? Because it's nurture rather than nature, that makes one who he is. With this, I end my essay. HHHH ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Susan Hill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Susan Hill essays

  1. The King of the Castle Character Assessment Joseph Hooper.

    The reason why he didn't say anything to his son was because he had never done so in his life and he had left it too long, so nothing could be done. Hooper admits that he tried to avoid his father's mistakes but he only succeeded in replacing them with so many of his own.

  2. A comparative study of the role of children and the presentation of the experiences ...

    Because of changing social circumstances, it is harder to understand the thoughts and actions of Leo. It is hard to accept his naivety.

  1. Can Hooper be seen as anything other than Evil? A comparative Essay on 'I'm ...

    The setting might affect Hopper by giving him an impression that he knows the area and that he controls, for example in his father's house. The language used to create the atmosphere is extremely descriptive and interesting. Susan Hill also gives you the views on the other characters views on

  2. Consider the theme of loneliness in the novel "I am the king of the ...

    Even though he wants her, his habit of being alone stops him from taking further action at the start. When he says to Miss Kingshaw " I am a lonely man" right after he meets her, we can immediately spot his sexual urge. Joseph Hooper is a portrait of failure.

  1. I'm The King Of The Castle, by Susan Hill - Who Is Responsible For ...

    'When my father dies, this house will belong to me, I shall be master. It'll all be mine.' This quote mentions 'master' which has a continuous reoccurrence throughout the story and shows us that Hooper is expressing his control over the other characters.

  2. Explain the importance of Warings in the novel?

    only built to create the illusion that the Hoopers were an upper class family who had lived in the countryside for centuries. This is because oak is a kind of wood that is only found in houses built before modern building materials such as tiles were developed.

  1. Compare and contrast the portrayal of parent / child relationshipsin the two novels

    Mrs Kingshaw and Charles (Kingshaw) probably have the worst communication in the whole novel. Throughout the book, Mrs Kingshaw is repeatedly portrayed as a 'bad' parent because she (unknowingly to herself) continues to ignore the evil bullying that is being carried out by Hooper. Even when her own son is crying out for help, she tells him to 'stop being so silly'.

  2. Explore The Ways In Which The Monster In Shelly's Frankenstein And Kingshaw In I'm ...

    I'm The King Of The Castle was published in 1970 but set in the 1960's. This was a time when families were happy and children content like the saying 'children should be seen and not heard'. Susan hill is criticising this idea.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work