• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I'm the King of the Castle" - In her after word, the writer talks about "the evil - for I think I evil-of Hooper". What do you think the novel says about the nature of evil in people?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I'm the King of the Castle" Qn: In her after word, the writer talks about "the evil - for I think I evil-of Hooper". What do you think the novel says about the nature of evil in people? In my perspective, I do not believe that people are born evil. "Evil" is undisputedly an arbitrary term whereby different people have different scope of what evil is. Susan Hill's definition of "evil" is that of Hooper -being sadistic and afflicting harm in others, as seen in Hooper. Yet, I feel that Hill's definition of "evil" is rather cynical and biased. Hill should not even relate Hooper to "evil" in the first place, as the child is still growing up and does not know how to differentiate between good and bad, and the fact that he does not receive any love and care sort of make him an "emotionless" person. Thus purely describing him as evil is somewhat biased. ...read more.

Middle

Hooper's hostile attitude towards Kingshaw indeed makes readers feel indignant. However, the crucial point here, which I feel, is why Hooper is so mean towards Kingshaw. It is a fact that all living beings need companionship. Hooper's cruelty towards Kingshaw could be a way he shows affection. Well, we never know for sure how some people choose to show affection. And cruelty could be how Hooper chooses to show. Furthermore, Hooper has never ever experienced the true feeling of love and care. So most probably, he doesn't know anything about love. So, that explains why he thinks cruelty is a form of affection. Taking for instance the case of ailing pets. Veterinarians and pet lovers, in a bid to stop their precious pets from suffering more pain, put them to sleep. This, irrefutable, is a cruel thing, but it is a way pet lover show their affection towards their pets. Now, are their actions really evil and inhumane? ...read more.

Conclusion

Critics have commented on Kingshaw as having "natural goodness". Now, the question is, if people are born evil, then why is Kingshaw still so kind? Kingshaw has been inundated with taunts and torments from Hooper. Yet, there is still this tinge of kindness inside him that made him remain good right from the start, albeit he did harbour some ill intentions of harming Hooper initially ("had only to move his hand...so that he would topple through the well of the staircase", chapter 2). So, if people were to born evil, then, why is Kingshaw still benevolent? Therefore, my motion, that people are not born evil, is further reinforced here. In conclusion, I'd like to state that it is nurture, not nature, that made Hooper evil, and that people are certainly not born evil. Perhaps one simple analogy one to reinforce my point is that when an adopted child commits a crime, the ones he would blame are definitely his foster parents and not his natural parents. Why? Because it's nurture rather than nature, that makes one who he is. With this, I end my essay. HHHH ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Susan Hill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Susan Hill essays

  1. A comparative study of the role of children and the presentation of the experiences ...

    In this way, it is more neutral. You can see the thoughts of all the characters, and feel a sympathy for each, in a different way. It helps one to understand the characters a little better. Like the opening of the novel where Mr Hooper comes back from visiting his dying father.

  2. I'm The King Of The Castle, by Susan Hill - Who Is Responsible For ...

    In Chapter 14, Kingshaw makes a ew friend called Fielding. He learns about life on the farm and views a calf being born. The two boys appear to get on very well together and Fielding asks Kingshaw if he would like to stay for dinner.

  1. Explain the importance of Warings in the novel?

    The colours used are colours like "bleached and grey-ish white" and "moth-like whiteness" which are ghastly and ashen, implying that death loiters in the house. Warings is like a house which entertains death. To start with such a morbid and bleak scene prepares the readers that something ominous is bound

  2. Compare and contrast the portrayal of parent / child relationshipsin the two novels

    This is evident when she says things like; "Oh, that is a wicked, wicked way to talk, whatever can you be thinking about? Whatever can poor Edmund have done to you?" This is a classic line from Mrs Kingshaw, telling the reader that she is definitely on Hooper's 'side'.

  1. Drummonds was the educational institution Hooper had been attending

    Kingshaw had schooled at St Vincents since he was seven years old. Unlike other children who dreaded leaving home and going to a foreign place, Kingshaw was tensed with excitement upon his departure and separation from his Mother. He, in fact wanted her to leave faster so that "it could all begin."

  2. Consider the theme of loneliness in the novel "I am the king of the ...

    Even though he wants her, his habit of being alone stops him from taking further action at the start. When he says to Miss Kingshaw " I am a lonely man" right after he meets her, we can immediately spot his sexual urge. Joseph Hooper is a portrait of failure.

  1. The King of the Castle Character Assessment Joseph Hooper.

    to his son, 'You will come to understand what it means to be a Hooper, as you get older.' He is a man of ambition and investment and his family history is very important, to him because he says to his son, 'He was known and respected the world over.

  2. 'Evaluate how the Box Hill area is influenced by human activity'.

    have had the same conditions and the same amounts of trampling; the weaker soil may have been affected more than the stronger soil. 2. The pressure of use: Some people and some species of animals are heavier than others. Some animals even have smaller feet than others, meaning that they

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work