• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I'm the King of the Castle" - In her after word, the writer talks about "the evil - for I think I evil-of Hooper". What do you think the novel says about the nature of evil in people?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I'm the King of the Castle" Qn: In her after word, the writer talks about "the evil - for I think I evil-of Hooper". What do you think the novel says about the nature of evil in people? In my perspective, I do not believe that people are born evil. "Evil" is undisputedly an arbitrary term whereby different people have different scope of what evil is. Susan Hill's definition of "evil" is that of Hooper -being sadistic and afflicting harm in others, as seen in Hooper. Yet, I feel that Hill's definition of "evil" is rather cynical and biased. Hill should not even relate Hooper to "evil" in the first place, as the child is still growing up and does not know how to differentiate between good and bad, and the fact that he does not receive any love and care sort of make him an "emotionless" person. Thus purely describing him as evil is somewhat biased. ...read more.

Middle

Hooper's hostile attitude towards Kingshaw indeed makes readers feel indignant. However, the crucial point here, which I feel, is why Hooper is so mean towards Kingshaw. It is a fact that all living beings need companionship. Hooper's cruelty towards Kingshaw could be a way he shows affection. Well, we never know for sure how some people choose to show affection. And cruelty could be how Hooper chooses to show. Furthermore, Hooper has never ever experienced the true feeling of love and care. So most probably, he doesn't know anything about love. So, that explains why he thinks cruelty is a form of affection. Taking for instance the case of ailing pets. Veterinarians and pet lovers, in a bid to stop their precious pets from suffering more pain, put them to sleep. This, irrefutable, is a cruel thing, but it is a way pet lover show their affection towards their pets. Now, are their actions really evil and inhumane? ...read more.

Conclusion

Critics have commented on Kingshaw as having "natural goodness". Now, the question is, if people are born evil, then why is Kingshaw still so kind? Kingshaw has been inundated with taunts and torments from Hooper. Yet, there is still this tinge of kindness inside him that made him remain good right from the start, albeit he did harbour some ill intentions of harming Hooper initially ("had only to move his hand...so that he would topple through the well of the staircase", chapter 2). So, if people were to born evil, then, why is Kingshaw still benevolent? Therefore, my motion, that people are not born evil, is further reinforced here. In conclusion, I'd like to state that it is nurture, not nature, that made Hooper evil, and that people are certainly not born evil. Perhaps one simple analogy one to reinforce my point is that when an adopted child commits a crime, the ones he would blame are definitely his foster parents and not his natural parents. Why? Because it's nurture rather than nature, that makes one who he is. With this, I end my essay. HHHH ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Susan Hill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Susan Hill essays

  1. Can Hooper be seen as anything other than Evil? A comparative Essay on 'I'm ...

    Nobody should come here." This shows that Hooper will fight to have the house to him self and that he is a very dominant character in the book. Hooper does many obvious evil actions in the book, this starts from the very beginning of the book with the arrival of Kingshaw and Helena Kingshaw

  2. Consider the theme of loneliness in the novel "I am the king of the ...

    Charles Kingshaw is the son of Helena Kingshaw. He has lost his father and is also not close to his mother at all. She tries to educate him but in a very superficial way and has inability to understand him. It even seems as if it is an obligation of her part and her life is more important than any other thing.

  1. Explain the importance of Warings in the novel?

    It is evident that Kingshaw has no home of his own. Here, Warings is shown as the property of the Hoopers, It conveys the theme of British being class- conscious, concerned about their ownership of properties and houses. The essential theme of isolation is also conveyed through Warings itself.

  2. A comparative study of the role of children and the presentation of the experiences ...

    In this way, it is more neutral. You can see the thoughts of all the characters, and feel a sympathy for each, in a different way. It helps one to understand the characters a little better. Like the opening of the novel where Mr Hooper comes back from visiting his dying father.

  1. I'm The King Of The Castle, by Susan Hill - Who Is Responsible For ...

    He resents the fact that she brought him to Warings and becomes increasingly ashamed of the way she talks and acts with no pride in herself. Kingshaw does not trust his mother and has no honest conversations or connections with her.

  2. Compare and contrast the portrayal of parent / child relationshipsin the two novels

    I think that she is on Hoopers 'side' rather than her own son's because she is becoming very fond of Mr Hooper. I think she maybe be very desparate to hang onto her new life in this new house and with her new man and is willing to block out any potential problems that may take away her new life.

  1. Explore The Ways In Which The Monster In Shelly's Frankenstein And Kingshaw In I'm ...

    Further more Kingshaw is exhibited to be a victim from Hooper's malevolence when they return from Hangwood. Hooper blames Kingshaw for the wound on his head. 'It was Kingshaw, it was Kingshaw he pushed me in the water' In the previous chapters at Hangwood where the two boys are drawn

  2. 'Evaluate how the Box Hill area is influenced by human activity'.

    have had the same conditions and the same amounts of trampling; the weaker soil may have been affected more than the stronger soil. 2. The pressure of use: Some people and some species of animals are heavier than others. Some animals even have smaller feet than others, meaning that they

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work