• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

I was confused at first when I watched Luhrman's version, as he has swapped the Capulet

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Shakespeare A Comparative Essay <INTRODUCTION> This essay compares two scenes, from two film products. The directors have very differently modernised and restored the famously tragic love story written by William Shakespeare. In this essay I will be writing about the fight scenes in 'Romeo & Juliet', compare the different setting and language, and interpret the characters between the Baz Luhrmann-1996, and Franco Zefferelli-1968 versions of this William Shakespeare play. William Shakespeare (1564-1616) wrote thirty-four plays altogether. They can be separated into five different groups according to the subject matter and theme: * The Histories, e.g. Henry V * The Tragedies e.g. Macbeth * The Comedies e.g. Twelfth Night, A Midsummer Nights Dream * The Romances e.g. The Tempest * The problem plays e.g. the Mechant of Venice, and Romeo & Juliet (interestingly both set in venice...) Shakespeare wrote at a time of considerable political unrest. Elizabeth-I was on her throne and Britain was under constant threat from Roman Catholic enemies who wanted to restore the links with Rome that Henry VIII had severed. He depended on royal approval to survive, so it is hardly surprising that he is pro-monarchy, as in Henry V and Macbeth, and anti civil war, as in Romeo & Juliet. Shakespeare wrote for a company of actors that he knew so he was able to tailor the parts to suit them. Women, however, were not allowed to perform on stage - acting was regarded as a lowly profession unsuitable for women - so all female roles had to be played by boys. Summary This is a story of a love at first sight, a love so powerful it results in tragedy beyond prophecy. This love is between Romeo and Juliet, who belong to rival families in the city of Verona, and how the hatred between their familes brings about their deaths. These families go by the names of the Montague and the Capulet Houses. ...read more.

Middle

Having a bawdy banter (the houses have swapped, maybe Luhrman noticed the houses suited the script better that way..?) the Montague Boys express their hatred of Capulets. In Zefferellis version, this scene is set in a dusty village, and the many villagers are the surrounding environment in the busy market place. One: A dog of the House of Montague moves me. Two: to move is to stir, and to be valiant is to stand, therefore if thou art moved, thou runn'st away. One: a dog of that house shall move me to stand. I will take the wall of any man or maid of Montagues.> protesting against accusation to being effeminate. Luhramann's version has an expensive Montague car approach, and park beside them. The capulets discuss how best to provoke a fight without breaking the law One: My naked weapon is out. Quarrel, I will back thee.- start a fight I'll back you up. Two: How, turn thy back and run?-you promise you won't flee? One : Fear me not.-Trust me One: Let us take the law of our sides, let them begin.-so we don't get into trouble, let them start the fight instead. Two: I will frown as they walk by, and let them take it as they list.-I'll pull a face when they walk past, and let them assume what they want. One: nay as they dare. I will bite my thumb at them, which is a disgrace to them if they bear it.-no that might not work out, i will bite my thumb at them, if they don't retaliate it is a disgrace to their people, their choice.> One bites his own thumb - considered to be a highly insulting gesture - at Capulet, verbal confrontatation rapidly escalates into a fight. Sampson: (growls and bears his steely teeth! Slamming the door and steps up) do you bite your thumb at us sir?-'' '' One: I do bite my thumb sir-'' ''slighty worried. ...read more.

Conclusion

How the actors/characters interpretted the script and interacted amongst eachother was helpful when learning about them and adapting to the different styles in each version. Both directors aimed for/enabled the characters to have a natural and realistic look, again this helped interpret the significance of characters within the story. As a result, each film seemed to tell a different story, as the overall individual exaggerated film contrasts were different. Both versions seemed appropriate and were successfull in each era. Zefferelli enabled each scene to appear natural by setting the film in a sunny, humid, dusty old village; the scenes involved a dull roar of villagers in a crowded market place-(the audience feel part of the village), and without the advantage of modern camera tricks, or musical influence/emotion. In the fight scenes the town all get involved and are entertained by the hatred and violence, making jokes and treating the feud like its a joke itself. This doesn't allow the audience treat the feud seriously, and almost loses the audience as the fights are fast and rather untidy. However Luhrman has an advantage of camera tricks and musical emotion, which the film occasionally relys on, to grab attention and storytell alone. The conflicts in this version are personal between the main house characters, every character has their own dramatic, individual introduction, in fact the film has a dramatic introduction hinting what is in store, opera music, flashing images, bright colours, snap shots of characters. Consequently capturing the minds of a young audience. Zefferelli has made his version comparable to Shakespearean times, being naturally traditional. Despite both versions having different intents, in both versions the actors are fluent with the language, expression in the words makes it easier to adjust with a Shakespearean world, and follow the complex plot. The intent of Luhrmann's version was for the film to appeal to, and be accessible to a modern day audience. He hoped that the power of this play would be enjoyed, especially by a young audience, this version has compromised a Shakespearean language with a modern world. By Lauren Rickard 10B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. Violence and conflict are central to Romeo and Juliet. Discuss this theme with reference ...

    Capulet expects his daughter to rejoice to the news of her wedding, because Paris is a high-born man and this celebration will elevate Juliet from her grief. Lord Capulet's irritation progresses: "Hang thee, young baggage, disobedient wretch!...My fingers itch." Capulet expresses a violent force of emotion by voicing 'hang'.

  2. How does Baz Luhrmann use props, iconography, costumes and settings to create his own ...

    Romeo wears a suit but it is not smart. This implies he is made to wear this like his father but he has no intention of becoming like him. Whereas Paris is smart and is Juliet's father's ideal man for his daughter.

  1. Using camera angles, soundtrack, costume, props and setting describe the world Baz Lurhman has ...

    The non-diegetic sound used in the film is also used effectively to create pace, tension and excitement. Right at the beginning, after the newsreader scene, the non-diegetic sound used is linked with the clips, from the movie, which are shown.

  2. &amp;quot;Baz Luhrmann said that in his version of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, he wanted ...

    would have been performed to a theatre audience of all roughly the same social class and ethnic group. However, Baz Luhrmann creates a film that has to appeal to all audiences. For this reason, he has included different ethnicity of actors, such as Black and Latino actors.

  1. Compare and Contrast how Mercutio is Portrayed in the Baz Luhrman and the Franco ...

    is only when Romeo interferes in the "play fighting" that serious injury was caused). There was no music in the background of the Zefferelli film, it could be there to dramatize and help create the scene as if you were actually there, whereas in the Luhrman version, there was ecstatic

  2. Compare and contrast the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films,by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann. ...

    There is dramatic music and tension. The attention is on Mercutio as he dies. The way that it is presented is very significant; when Mercutio is dying the 'audience' are laughing at him ironically. This reinforces that he is a joker and they do not take him seriously, but when

  1. Comparing two versions of Romeo &amp;amp; Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    However in Luhrman´┐Żs version, he has used the modern day equivalent of a prince, a police general, this is good because there are no princes in modern day cities so Luhrman has used the next best thing, a modern day equivalent of a prince.

  2. In 'Romeo And Juliet' there is anger, love and violence. Discuss these elements in ...

    him into a fight but Romeo responds sensibly and does not take up the challenge. Mercutio is incensed at this seeming fearfulness and challenges Tybalt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work