• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I watched two versions of Romeo and Juliet, A man called Franco Zeffirelli made one of the films in 1968 and it was set in Italy. And the other film was made in 1999 this film was set in America

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Romeo and Juliet Comparing and Contrasting Act 3 Scene 1 I watched two versions of Romeo and Juliet, A man called Franco Zeffirelli made one of the films in 1968 and it was set in Italy. And the other film was made in 1999 this film was set in America. The stars in the Zeffirelli version were Leonard Whiting and the stars of the Luhrmann version starred Leonardo Dicaprio and Claire Danes. In the Zeffirelli version the actors wore jerkins and pantaloons and in the Luhrmann version they wore shirts and trousers. This shows me that the Zeffirelli version was set a long time ago and the Luhrmann version was meant to be a more modern. In the Luhrmann version at the beginning they showed a newspaper called 'Ancient Goudge' It showed the Montague building and it showed the Capulet building. This shows that they were angry about each other because of each of their businesses doing better than the other. ...read more.

Middle

Tybalt is a mean and angry character he does not care about Romeo's love to Juliet in either versions of the film. Tybalt just wants to hate Romeo because he is all Montagues even though Romeo has done nothing to him. Mercutio insults Tybalt he says to Tybalt "make it a word and a blow". And Tybalt gets angry and he says "you shall find me opt enough to that, sit, and you will give me occasion". In the Zeffirelli version they were fighting with swords and then They were fighting like it was just a joke they were fighting slowly and their faces had a smile. But in the Luhrmann version they were all serious and they were fighting fast with their guns. And they had more anger within them that they wanted to release because I can tell by their faces especially Tybalt. And then Mercutio was injured but he says "a scratch". Right after he says "A plague of both your houses"! ...read more.

Conclusion

And in the Luhrmann version, When Romeo Killed Tybalt there was a close up on him for a while. In the Zeffirelli version they used older clothes, transport and other things. And In the Luhrmann version they used newer things like transport, clothes, guns and other things so the people want to keep on watching and they can understand the story more. I am going to finish my essay by telling you about what I liked and disliked most about the Zeffirelli version and the Luhrmann version. I mostly liked the Luhrmann version because when I was watching the film it made me continue watching more of the films. It had shorter scenes and the story was faster. I would not want to watch the Zeffirelli version because it was not very realistic like when they were fighting it looked like they were just fighting for fun. And another reason I did not like it because it was slower and it was not a film that I would want to watch again. This made the whole film less serious. ?? ?? ?? ?? Roy Dharmarajan 11N - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. Compare and contrast the opening scene of the Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann film ...

    After the first prologue there is a fast zoom into the screen and through the city showing layers of images. This action hits you with its sheer energy (as does the flash of clips of the film just before the scene), we then have panoramas of the city to show

  2. Compare and contrast the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films,by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann. ...

    But in this scene we also catch a glimpse of Mercutio's more disturbed side. Romeo and Mercutio are isolated from the others in the darkness and it goes silent in both films apart from Mercutio's speech. Mercutio isn't laughing like usual and his voice echoes in the night, in the

  1. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    has to chose from, such as forget about Rosaline and find someone else, or tell Rosaline how he feels and see what happens. After he meets Juliet his love for Rosaline disappears and a new and different love appears. As he see her for the first time he falls madly in love.

  2. How effectively do Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli interpret Act I Scene VI when ...

    When he greets his guests he says: "Welcome gentlemen" He does not welcome the women at all, he seems to favour the men over the women. In the Baz Luhrmann version a lot of the text is missed out. When Lord Capulet is talking to his guests a lot of

  1. Choose two scenes from "Romeo and Juliet" and comment on how Zeffirelli and Luhrmann ...

    of love and hate in the play, but overall fire is the negative, dangerous element and water is safe and pure. They are linked to the story in that water can put out a fire, as love conquers hate at the end of the play.

  2. In this essay I shall be discussing the differences and similarities between two film ...

    I will now move on to discuss "Lady Capulet's praise of Paris" in act 1 scene 3. This sonnet is one of many religious metaphors such as Paris' face being a metaphor for a book, the bible. This is shown in the modern day translation.

  1. Romeo and Juliet - comparing film versions.

    this quote means if someone can decide his own life then let them and at the end he says "On lusty gentlemen!" this is a great expression for them to proceed to the party. He speaks with power, this is shown by the exclamation marks used.

  2. I was confused at first when I watched Luhrman's version, as he has swapped ...

    The Capulets fashioned black and gold shirts, which signifies danger and wealth. Montagues wear thin, plain, dirty cream shirts, this does not signify wealth. It is clear that Tybalts 'gang' are vain and appear to have higher significance within the story, as both films present them like this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work