• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

If Caesar had lived, would he have become a tyrant?

Extracts from this document...


If Caesar had lived, would he have become a tyrant? Caesar, the emperor of Rome has just come out of battle, with Pompey. The people of Rome celebrate on the streets. There are two men that refuse to celebrate. Indeed, they are strongly opposed to the celebrations taking place. They believe that Caesar is becoming too powerful and is being treated like a God. They are not the only two against the celebrations. There are many others. They find a powerful man, loved by the people of Rome, and turn him against Caesar. Now they are fully equipped. Ready to kill Caesar himself. Was this a blatant act of jealousy, or was Caesar really becoming 'too big for his boots.' There is much bias in this play and many of the characters are corrupt. There are even more lies, and concealed truths. I have to see past those and make a fair analysis of the play. In the first scene there is a clash between the upper class, represented by Flavius or Marullus, and the lower class represented by the scores of plebeians, evidently overjoyed with the public celebrations. It becomes clear, especially when Caesar is assassinated, that it is the mob, through their sheer numbers if anything, that hold the power. It is the conspirators' inability to see this that marks their eventual downfall. ...read more.


She dreamt that Caesar's statue 'ran blood' and that the people of Rome came to bathe their hands in it. Caesar quickly dismisses this. 'Cowards die many times before their deaths, The valiant never taste death but once.' These seem, especially for a man of his power, to be extremely wise words. However he then goes on to 'spoil' them by continuing, not to be valiant, but to be vain. 'Of all the wonders that I have yet heard, It seems to me most strange that men should fear.' Shakespeare appears to confuse the audience, by sandwiching this foolery, with another wise phrase. 'Seeing that death, a necessary end, Will come when it come.' Calphurnia is relieved when the augurers, come with bad news, having made a sacrifice. We are informed that the beast that they have cut open had not heart. This was considered a bad sign. 'They would not have you stir forth today' says a servant. Caesar, shows his arrogance once more. 'The gods do this to put cowards to shame. Caesar be a beast without a heart If he should stay at home for fear. No Caesar shall not. Danger knows full well That Caesar is more dangerous than he.' This last sentence in particular seems rather disturbing. It would appear that challenging the Gods is something Caesar does not think too long about. ...read more.


Caesar's vanity also gets the better of him. None more so than on the day of his murder. There are a series of mistakes. Shakespeare seems to have put these in with a sense of irony. This appears to make the ending less shocking, which was important for an audience in the 1600's when killing on stage was not generally acceptable. The audience knows the killing is imminent, and Caesar seems to dig himself into 'an even bigger hole'. It starts with him saying he knows no fear, and how alien a concept that is to him. It finishes with him saying he is unshakable. It is clear that the conspirators have reason to kill him. I believe that Caesar would have become a tyrant, if he had been allowed to live. It was clear that he was behaving like a bully towards others. He tried to compensate for his like of control over his life by forcing his good points upon others, and making up other characteristics. If he had become king one can only think of the damage he would have caused the empire. He was a desperate and needy man entrusted with too much power for his own good. It was a gloomy end, for a potentially great man. 'Caesar: I rather tell thee what is to be feared, that what I fear; for always I am Caesar.' Act 1, Scene 2. Paul Abdou 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gender Transformation of Caesar

    5 star(s)

    Calphurnia's earlier use of the phrase "lusty Romans" adds a sexualized dimension to the regicide, allowing for the possibility that the hunters metaphorically rape Caesar. As the men ritualistically cover themselves with Caesar's blood it as if they are celebrating the success of the hunt.

  2. Julius Caesar

    Plebeians were all on Pompey's side until he died, then they switched over to Caesar, then he died and the person to kill him was the Plebeians favourite; so Brutus had that advantage over Anthony before he even started his speech.

  1. Julius Caersar - Analysis of Brutus

    Not surprisingly, Caesar's death is avenged in the end, with the two of the conspirators' double suicide. As superstition is inter-twined within the basis of the entire play, we can reasonably conclude that it is because of this irrational belief of why certain events occur and how to avoid them, that Caesar is retired and eventually avenged.

  2. 'Julius Caesar'- Shakespeare

    He enters the scene with Caesars body, creating a dramatic effect. He starts his speech with 'friends, Roman, countrymen' because he wants to come to them as a friend rather than a ruler trying to gain power and by doing this he puts them at ease.

  1. How suitably is the theme of the supernatural depicted in the play 'Julius Caesar'?

    The storm appealed to the Elizabethan audiences as they hungered for strange and supernatural events. Shakespeare is a genius in portraying the power of the storm through his language which is very effective. He uses descriptive words and words which create visual effects in our mind.Cassius shows us the supernatural

  2. Free essay

    Julius Caesar

    When Brutus and Antony both speak at the funeral it was meant to tell the people about Caesar but the way they both did it showed they had their own purpose for making the speech. Within both speeches you could see how they had their own unique way of addressing the crowd as well as different persuasive techniques.

  1. What do we learn about the characters of Cassius and Brutus and how they ...

    Brutus is even more kind to his servants in this scene! While he accuses Cassius of many crimes, he offers his men, Varro and Claudius to "lie in [his] tent and sleep". This show of generosity contrasts with the way he treated Cassius earlier, and shows him to be hostile towards Cassius (since he even treats servants better)

  2. What do we learn about the characters of Cassius and Brutus in these scenes, ...

    what's more, he is trying to appease Brutus by claiming how wonderful he is to give him complete inferiority to make Brutus feel pre-eminent. As the scene develops Brutus admits that he fears that the people will choose Caesar as their king.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work