• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In 1066, it was a year of crisis. There were two bloody battles, namely the Battle of Stanford Bridge

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Joyce Chiu 7J In 1066, it was a year of crisis. There were two bloody battles, namely the Battle of Stanford Bridge and the Battle of Hastings. How did these battles happen? The King of England, Edward Confessor died on 5th January 1066. Harold Godwineson, Harald Hardraada and William (Duke of Normandy) all wanted to be the next King of England. ...read more.

Middle

He had no choice, but to march his soldiers to London. William's soldiers were stronger than the Saxons' soldiers. They were well trained, fully equipped with horses, bows and arrows. On the other hand, Harold's solders were part time soldiers who were farmers. Harold was badly prepared for the battle, and a lot of his soldiers were exhausted after the long march. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Norman cavalry attacked. The shield wall was strong, and the Normans suffered heavy casualties. There was fierce fighting on both sides. Again and again, the Normans attacked the Saxon shield wall. Around midday, William thought of a trick. His army pretended to retreat and let the Saxons ran after them so that the shield wall would break. The trick worked and Harold was killed. William won the Battle of Hastings, because of his luck, his skilful army and his trick. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why did William win at the Battle of Hastings?

    Harold had problems with his fleet. A few weeks before the invasion he had sent his ships to block William but they failed and became demoralised. Many of the men wanted to go back home and gather in the harvest. Harold also lost many ships in the same storm that William would have been stuck in if he had not gone into the Somme estuary.

  2. The Battle Of Hastings was in the year 1066, in the medieval times.The battle ...

    He also had very strong shields to protect his army. * He had built and also bought lots of ships to carry forces across the sea to attack Harold Godwinson's army with. He had things like cannons etc. for long range distances, so that when they are sailing across to

  1. why the normans won the battle of hastings

    Once again the English suffered many casualties. It was now four in the afternoon. Heavy English casualties from previous attacks meant that the front line was shorter. The Normans could now attack from the side. The few housecarls that were left were forced to form a small circle round the English standard.

  2. Compare the presentation of war in the Olivier and Branagh versions of 'Henry V'. ...

    There are horses rearing to show the frightening side to battle and lots of action between shots accompanied by fast heroic music. This scene depicts battle as very heroic and with little violence and blood. It almost seems cheerful. There is a scene quite like Robin Hood where the English pounce on the French from above in the trees.

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    The Luftwaffe concentrated all their strength on knocking out Fighter Command and made repeated attacks on the airfields. Of the 33 heavy attacks in the next two weeks, 24 were against airfields. The key sector stations were hit repeatedly: Biggin Hill and Hornchurch four times each, Debden and North Weald twice each.

  2. Are knights and castles a sufficient explanation for Norman military success between 1066 and ...

    Either way, it would seem that the knights in a military sense were important as a mobile, well armed and protected force that contributed to Norman military Success. However, the success of the Norman Military can not be given entirely to the Knights, as Castles, the main method of defense and claiming land were equally if not more important.

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    Churchill knew that people would relate to and therefore sympathize with such young men. The sacrifice of 'the young' is a powerful image, which is why it is partially an attempt to draw America into the war on Britain's side.

  2. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    the radio, or in the newspapers, this was so that everyone all over the country was aware of the myth. The myth kept on being repeated so that the public would believe it. It was important to keep the myth going because it boosted morale and it kept Britain believing

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work