In Act 3 of 'The Crucible', how are Dramatic Devices and Events Used by Miller, to Highlightv,ljfkf

Authors Avatar

In Act 3 of ‘The Crucible’, how are Dramatic Devices and Events Used by Miller, to Highlight the Key Issues of the Play?

‘The Crucible’ by Arthur Miller was first produced in 1953 in the middle of the McCarthy political ‘witch-hunt’, and was made to show ‘the essential nature of one of the strangest and most awful chapters in human history,’ making it a political parable. It is set in a strong puritan society-a society of devout Protestants who criticised the newly established Elizabethan church and who led a life under very strict religious rules. Puritanism was not just a religion, but a way of life, with the government rules based on religious morals. Political and moral values paralleled each other, and as a result of paranoia regarding the fear shared amongst the inhabitants that the philosophy of communism would undermine and destroy the American way of life, the government became obsessed with searching out American communist sympathisers. Because the Puritans in Salem led such a strict way of life, hatred and grudges manifested themselves in the community, but without an outlet. As a result of some amateur dabbling in the supernatural by a group of adolescent girls in Salem, caused by the ‘seen and not heard’ policy Puritan children faced, necessitating them to go slightly wild when not under adult supervision because of the silence and politeness that they had to endure otherwise, the jails were eventually filled up with innocent men and women accused of witchcraft, at the whim of the group of girls’ newly found power.

        Miller clearly understands the absurd and horrific nature of these trials, and strives to portray that in his play, highlighting some of the major issues that clearly needed to be addressed at the time. Religious hypocrisy is veryy evident in Act 3, with key religious figures using religion for their own personal gain. Reputation also played a key role in the puritan society of Salem, where guilt by association is particularly pernicious. Blame placing and indictments riddle the play throughout, even before the confinements of the courtroom, and these accusations are instrumental in bringing the cry of witchcraft to Salem. Suppression of the truth is clearly evident in this act of the play, especially regarding Abigail, the girls and Parris. Danforth’s questioning techniques are also imposing and inflexible. There are too many reputations at stake for the figures caught up in the prosecutions to back out of the lies and hysteria. There are also elements of unwillingness to consider the fact that the court may be false, in an attempt to maintain social order, but in the process suppressing individuals and their freedom. There are also many contextual links to the fact that a name is important to a man, and each one has an unwillingness to part with it, and that it is an essential component of one’s character. ‘he that filches from me my good name…makes me poor indeed.’  

In Act 3, Miller clearly highlights the issue of religious hypocrisy, showing the stupidity of the morals behind the witch trials, and the obvious exploitation of them by individuals in their personal interest. They act under the cover of having good religous incentives, using the trials for personal gain.

Miller uses dramatic devices in this act to highlight religious hypocrisy. ‘I know not what a witch is.’ ‘How do you know then that you are not a witch?’ When the God-fearing, friendly Martha Corey is being accused for witchcraft, elements of black humour show-Martha claims she is not a witch, but doesn’t know what a witch is. The obscure humour serves only to heighten the tragedy, and to develop the idea of the trials being used for personal gain. ‘You’re hearing lies, lies!’ Giles Corey realises the hypocrisy of the trials, knowing that Thomas Putnam is exploiting the trials to gain money, by accusing owners of large plots of land, and that lies adorn the courtroom excessively, showing his pure frustration that he shares with Proctor and many others at the hypocrisy and absurd nature of the trials, through his angry and indignant delivery of lines.

Join now!

The events in Act 3 also highlight the religious hypocrisy, such as when Parris uses the parable of Cane and Abel to accuse Proctor. ‘You should surely know that Cain were an upright man, yet he did kill Abel.’ The fact that he is using the bible to try and get someone hanged, paralleled with the fact that he is using the trials to gain money and a reputation anyway, clearly shows the religious hypocrisy in this event. Parris himself, like Putnam, is using the trials for personal gain, under the cover of righteousness, because if the court falls apart, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay