• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In both Hills I'm The King of The Castle and Golding's Lord of The Flies, children are shown to learn from their experiences

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked How do the Writers show Children Learning From their Experiences? In both Hill?s ?I'm The King of The Castle? and Golding's ?Lord of The Flies?, children are shown to learn from their experiences in three aspects: their respect for human life, responsibility when in power and their response to savagery. Both writers take a similar stance in how they portray the children's respect for life but differ slightly; Hill uses Hooper to show how disrespect for life leads to sadism while Golding shows how repeated exposure to death leads to desensitisation and thus a lack of respect for human life. Hill uses Hooper again to show how power leads to corruption while Golding demonstrates how it can lead to good. Finally, Hill shows Kingshaw as first being attracted by savagery but later as rejecting it and returning to civility whereas Golding portrays Jack as starting out civil and slowly being seduced by power being savage holds. Hill uses Hoopers progression into sadism to highlight the dangers that come with inconsideration and disrespect for human life and Golding echoes this with his depiction of the boys desensitisation towards death which ends up leading them, like Hooper, to taking pleasure in the end of life. ...read more.


This changes once again with the death of Piggy. When Piggy dies Jack exclaims ?See? See? That's what you'll get?. The fact the Jack makes this threat following the death of Piggy, and that the tribe cheers him on for saying it, show that the boys no longer understand the significance of death and no longer respect human life. This has ties with the idea of British superiority that was held at time time. The belief stated that the British were civil and that the rest of the world were savages; Golding challenges this idea by instead proposing that all people are capable of savagery Hill uses Hooper once more to explore the consequences that arise when one is not responsible with the way they handle power. This abuse of power is first hinted at in Hoopers body language. Hill describes Hooper at one point as having ?moved nearer, menacing? in order to receive an answer from Kingshaw. This bold use of intimidation shows Hoopers willingness to demean and scare others in order to facilitate his own desires. As the novel progresses Hill starts to show Hooper delve into different forms of intimidation, mainly the use of psychological bullying. Hill characterises these demeaning taunts through the use of patronising language as can be seen in the line ?aren't you scaredy, all by yourself in the ...read more.


This goes to show that while Kingshaw may desire to reflect some of the pain he has received back to Hooper, when he is actually given the ability to do so he is incapable of doing so out of sheer kindness. This change in stance shows Kingshaw as having rejected savagery and accepted civility. This is not entirely reflected by Golding. Instead of showing an eventual salvation Golding shows how power can totally corrupt someone through Jack. Jack is initially shown as being relatively civil as when he attempts to kill a baby pig he understands what an ?enormity the downward stroke would be?. ?Enormity? perfectly encapsulates the struggle going on in Jack's brain, as killing the pig would result in Jack abandoning everything he has been taught about being civil up till this point. Unfortunately, Golding shows Jack to give into savagery and it comes to the point where Jack becomes almost sadistic in nature, taking pleasure in Piggy?s death exclaiming ?See? See?? This joyful way of talking about something is in stark contrast to the events that just took place and serve to show how power and savagery can corrupt ones way of thinking. Overall the writers take similar stances when it come to the numerous topics but they each have their slightly different take on it. One thing both writers demonstrate however is the inherent evil in man that can affect all people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE William Golding section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE William Golding essays

  1. Themes, Motifs, and Symbols - Themes are the fundamental concepts addressed and explored in ...

    The book is deeply preoccupied with the problem of fundamental, natural human evil; Simon is the sole exponent of fundamental, natural good. In a wholly nonreligious way, Simon complicates the philosophical statement the novel makes about human beings, proposing an alternative to the natural-savage model presented by Jack and the obedient-civilized model presented by Ralph.

  2. Analyse, review and comment on the three different presentations of Simon's death in 'Lord ...

    He stares at the body and the camera stays focused on him. This actually helps an audience to see Simon's expression. The contrast is yet effective as this can tell an audience, once more, of Simon solitude in the way he is unconnected with the rest of the group.

  1. The Palace of Pleasure.

    and, of course, those boots I'm told her parents made for her (if the rumour's true, she hated them, and pretended to lose them, in someone else's tutor room). I was instantly attracted to her magnetic personality, and her dramatic talent was obvious to me.

  2. Discuss the depiction of unhappy families in O'Caseys 'Juno and the Paycock'.

    As a husband he is completely irresponsible. He contributes nothing to the family income because he is unemployed. When he is offered a job he does all he can to avoid getting the position. As a father, Boyle is also a complete failure.

  1. Childhood is portrayed as being full of difficulty and fear. How do the writers ...

    The fact that Hooper speaks about how ?it's not your house then? and jests at him once he learns that he is a ?Governor?s Bequest Boy? goes to show how Hooper uses his own wealth as a tool to prejudice against others.

  2. How do the writers present difficulties faced by those who are different in ...

    Golding reflects this in his novel, by using the portrayal of Piggy in comparison to the other boys on the island. Golding writes how ?Piggy was an outsider?, most likely due to the prejudice directed towards to the Piggy, because of the fact that he has an ?accent? and is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work