• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

'In plot, in imagery, in structure, Richard II offers us little thatis not already present or implicit in Edward II. 'Assess Shakespeare's debt to Marlowe in this play.

Extracts from this document...


'In plot, in imagery, in structure, Richard II offers us little that is not already present or implicit in Edward II.' Assess Shakespeare's debt to Marlowe in this play. It was the very nature of the Renaissance writers to use as their subjects base a story or myth that had already been told. Renaissance means 're-birth' and their idea of creativity did not include originality, to show their skill was to take a plot that had already been told either by history, a predecessor or their contemporaries and to rework it and in doing so surpass it. "The object of history for many Renaissance writers was to learn the mistakes of the past in order to avoid them in the future." (Smith, viii). Our modern idea, received from the Romantics, of having to have originality to be able to create a best-seller was not what the Renaissance was about at all, in fact it was the opposite. The Renaissance period was about reliving what their ancestors had already achieved and being able to learn from their mistakes and advances. To be accused of having massive debt to a writer was neither uncommon nor frowned upon, and so to say Shakespeare's Richard II is indebted to Marlowe's Edward II is no slander on Shakespeare, it would only be slander if it was said that Shakespeare used an immaculate play and destroyed it in trying to rework it. However, the circumstances that are unusual in this case is that is often claimed that these two playwrights are in fact the same person. There have been many essays on the subject and to concentrate on this essay without taking these accounts into consideration would be unjust, as it may have been a case of the same playwright producing a separate play with his previous work shining through. The two playwrights were of almost identical age but Marlowe started writing early and "we know of course that Marlowe allegedly died just weeks before Shakespeare's name first appeared in print." ...read more.


The play has all the makings for a vicious and bloody story but Shakespeare choose to ignore the historical facts and replaced them with scenes of discussion. Where, according to sources like Holinshed's Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland which Shakespeare is said to have used ("Edward II...is heavily indebted, as are Shakespeare's history plays, to the magisterial Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland compiled by Raphael Holinshed..." Smith, viii), Richard II was captured and taken to Flint Castle, Shakespeare has instead a surrender of power and an admittance of defeat without as much as a sword being drawn. As soon as Henry entered England again he was welcomed, and seemed to be on a tour of the country while Richard was away in Ireland, rather than being a threat to the throne. Shakespeare avoided any sign of battle, and there were plenty of chances, the army of Welshman simply disbanded, York admitted defeat without a fight and Richard, despite his high mood when he first arrived home, soon despairs of his situation and tells his men to leave. Even the murder of the Richard, at the end of the play, is immediately regretted by Exton himself, and Henry, to whom the murder is beneficial, is deeply saddened by the news: Though I did wish him dead, I hate the murderer, love him murder�d. The guilt of conscience take thou for thy labour, But neither my good word nor princely favour. (V.vi.39-42) This is all in sharp contrast to Marlowe's play, in which we see two battles for power and many executions. "Edward II offers a profoundly nihilistic view of history, steeped in blood and treachery and without the transcendental assurance of human love." (Smith, ix). If this quotation is accurate then we can already see a huge difference starting to emerge in, not only plot, but also theme and imagery. Unlike Shakespeare, in Richard II, Marlowe does not shy away from violence and battles, he does not use speeches and conversations to settle the arguments, instead he uses such scenes as act three scene two. ...read more.


We see Marlowe's use of it often: "But what are kings when regiment is gone, / But perfect shadows in a sunshine day?" (V.i.26-7) and Shakespeare plays on this and uses it as one of his most obvious images throughout the play. Richard sees the sun as "the searching eye of heaven" (III.ii.37) and so with his divine appointment sees himself as on the same level as the sun, sees himself as heaven's eye watching over and ruling his people. He says that Henry and his accomplices work at night because they are "Not able to endure the sight of day," (III.ii.52). Another image that is used a lot in both plays is that of blood, and this image in fact links the two plays in an unusual way because with it Shakespeare actually refers to Edward III, Richard's grandfather, when the Duchess of Gloucester refers to the seven brothers as "seven vials of his sacred blood" (I.ii.12). So with this image Shakespeare knowingly links his play with an image he saw used in Marlowe's play, he has a plot that is already linked through the royal family of the time and he strengthens this link by not only repeating the themes used but using one of these themes to refer directly to one of the characters in Marlowe's Edward II. It is clear that Shakespeare owes something to Marlowe in his play, and how much he owes is of course unknown but as we have seen there are instances where Shakespeare makes it very clear to the reader that, as well as the characters he has based his play on having close links with the characters in Edward II, the play itself has close links with Marlowe's. It would be wrong to say that Shakespeare is so indebted to Marlowe that the play is not entirely his own because they are written with so many variables within them but it is certain that there are parts of the plays that are beyond any coincidental link. Word Count: 3,298. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

    This shows Edward was not a failure, as he was not persuaded by Godwine when trying to force him not to put Swein into exile. In addition to this in 1051 Edward was able to put the Godwines into exile.

  2. How does Shakespeare shape the audience's perception of Richard in Act One scene one ...

    (line 132 + 133) This is a very famous line from the play. The mewed (or caged, imprisoned) eagles are Clarence and Hastings; the kites and buzzards (which are inferior birds) who are free to hunt and roam are the Queen's followers.

  1. How far would you say Shakespeare creates sympathy in the minds of the audience ...

    is incapable of seeing how Richard is manipulating and using her to get to the throne. Moreover, the audience won't feel sympathy towards her as she is able to betray Edward so quickly by marrying his murderer. On the other hand, the audience may instead sympathise with Anne, as she

  2. Exploration of the techniques used to foreshadow death in Richard ...

    Margaret then manages to curse everyone who is of the York family. 'That none of you may live his natural age, But by some unlooked accident cut off' 1.3.210-11. The use of the word 'unlooked' implies that none of the characters will expect their death, or know when they are

  1. How is Richard III presented and how does his character compare with other figures ...

    Richard constantly repeats to Clarence that it is most definitely the queen's fault. He comes up with several lines saying that she is controlling the king including "that temps him to this harsh extremity", which could be said emphasising the 'extremity' to show it is the boundaries of tolerance.

  2. Richard III's Character in the Play and History

    This shows how evil she believes Richard to be. In line 49 Richard begins acting in order to woo Anne. By doing this he would have much more authority because Anne herself was of high importance; she was married to the prince.

  1. King Richard the Third

    8 During this scene Richard also exhibits the first signs of his arrogance, as, having succeeded in wooing Anne, he proceeds to brag to the reader in a soliloquy about his brilliance, implying that he thinks people are disposable, 'Was ever woman in this humur wooed?

  2. Edward VI - Young, Gifted and King.

    Edward was a devout Protestant but as well as religion, he pursued his studies with much the same vigour. Edward spent hours each day reading Greek and Roman stories, he learnt the scriptures and could speak at least five foreign languages.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work