• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In Sheila and Mr Birling, Priestley has created two characters whose views on social responsibility conflict.

Extracts from this document...


In Sheila and Mr Birling, Priestley has created two characters whose views on social responsibility conflict. The play points out the need for a sense of personal responsibility in every member of society, not only for individual actions, but also for the way actions affect others. These views are quite strongly voiced by the inspector and Sheila. Sheila has a conscience about her role in the death of a working class girl. Arthur Birling, on the other hand, has opposite views, his driving concern being self-interest. Arthur Birling is a rich and prosperous businessman. He is a 'self made man' and very proud of it. He is very aware of social class; to him it defines the value of human beings. It is clear at times that Mr Birling feels slightly insecure of his position on the social ladder. It is for this reason that he constantly mentions that he was formerly Lord Mayor of Brumley and that he is a local magistrate. He has no concepts of value other than money and position. He regards himself as being reasonable, his priorities are to make money and look after his family, ' A man has to look after him self and his own'. He ensures that his business makes as much money as possible by keeping 'labour costs down'. ...read more.


When shown the photo she reacts much more dramatically than her father. This tells us that she has already realised her behaviour towards the girl in Millwards had been inappropriate and unnecessary. When she finds out that Eva Smith had been made redundant, she is immediately sorry and obviously upset. She is very distressed about the consequences of her actions,' It's the only time I've done anything like that. I'll never, never do it again'. Mr Birling's reaction on the other hand is very different. When the inspector informs him of the girl's death he shows no interest or concern. He impatiently says ' Yes, yes. Horrible business but I don't understand why you should come here'. It is only after some prompting from the inspector that he remembers who Eva Smith was. He recollects how he discharged her from his employment, but he sees no connection between his actions towards the girl and her suicide. As far as Arthur Birling was concerned he was acting just as any other hardheaded businessman would. The girl, in his mind, was a troublemaker, she was asking for more money, she had organised a strike. ' She'd had a lot to say- far to much - so she had to go'. ...read more.


He does not want anything to hinder his chances of a knighthood. Mr Birling has learnt nothing from the evening's events, he has remained self-centred and heartless, a hardhearted businessman. The message that Priestley is trying to convey is that people should feel sympathy and care for each other and they should take responsibility for their actions. He wanted life after the war to be better he hoped that his writing would influence peoples ideas and influence society. He was concerned about the living conditions of the lower classes (the Eva Smiths of the world) and how poorly they were treated by the upper classes. Priestley felt that people should help each other regardless of social standing. From the play he shows that changes are more likely to come from the young rather than the older generation of upper classes. Sheila represents the impressionable young, ready to admit her faults and mend her ways. She is clearly aware of her wrong doings, whereas, Mr Birling represents the older generation of that time who are only interested in making money and their social position in society. Quite clearly Arthur Birling will not change his ways. It will be left to the younger generation to learn from the mistakes of the older generation. They must ensure that they are not repeated, or else they will be taught through ' fire and blood and anguish'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. Comment on how Priestley use the characters of Arthur and Sheila Birling to represent ...

    After the inspector goes the family finds out that he was a fake and that no girl had died. Arthur and Mrs Birling are glad that their secret is safe but Sheila and Eric still feel terrible. There is still one final twist at the end.

  2. Closely examine the character of Mr Arthur Birling and his daughter Sheila Birling showing ...

    His other prophecy is that he believes that technology has risen so high that he thinks that the Titanic is unsinkable. However, the audience of this play know that he is wrong because by this time, Titanic has already sunk and there has been a world war.

  1. Discuss the view of responsibility, guilt and blame for all of the characters in ...

    She has finally come to terms with what she had done. It is not really a question to the inspector because she is not sure. It is more of a rhetorical question. "So I'm really to blame?" She also accepts responsibility for what she has done in a way that


    The quotation shows that he is more concerned in profit making business then his daughter's wedding. In the play, "An Inspector Calls" Priestly shows Mr Birling as a man who believes in status difference. He says "community and all that is nonsense".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work