In 'The fruit at the bottom of the bowl' by Ray Bradbury and 'The tell tale heart' by Edgar Allen Poe, both authors have to convince the reader that the main characters is mad. How dothey do that? Which portrayal is more effective? Why

Authors Avatar

In ‘The Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl’ by Ray Bradbury and ‘The Tell Tale Heart’ by Edgar Allen Poe, both authors have to convince the reader that the main characters is mad. How do they do that? Which portrayal is more effective? Why?

1.The two stories that are going to be compared and contrasted are ‘The Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl’ by Ray Bradbury and ‘The Tell Tale Heart’ by Edgar Allen Poe. Both stories are about murder and how the murderers react after the killings. In the story ‘The Tell Tale Heart,’ Edgar Allen Poe writes about the murderer’s obsession and fear of an old man’s clouded eye that drives him to kill. When officers of the law come to question him, he imagines noises from the dead dismembered body, which forces him to admit his crime. In the second story, ‘The Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl’ by Ray Bradbury another murder has been committed. The author uses flash backs to explain where the murderer has been so that he could wipe out all traces of his fingerprints and presence at the house, his search for gloves then his obsession with cleaning everywhere, which eventually leads to his arrest. Both stories are about obsessions, in one the obsession caused the murder, in the other the obsession was with cleaning away all traces of the murderer is present at the scene of the crime after the murder. My aim will be to show how both murderers were mad, or became mad.

2.In the story ‘The Tell Tale Heart,’ the murderer has no motive for murder other than his obsession. One of the old man’s eyes, was clouded over and resembled a vulture’s eye, so the narrator could have been mad even before he killed the old man. In ‘The Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl,’ the murderer was driven to jealousy because, we are led to believe that the victim had stolen his wife, so perhaps as a result of this he killed the man out of rage and anger. This does not show madness, purely jealousy.

3.The two stories were very different in the narration. In ‘The Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl’ the story is told in the third person but the author makes us feel that we can understand William Acton’s thoughts and shows how he is thinking through the use of flashback and using conversation. I think this was more convincing of the main character madness than in ‘The Tell Tale Heart’, when in the first person, the narrator starts off by telling us that he is not mad. Throughout the story he talks about the fact of what he is doing could be mistaken for madness but is not really madness ‘…and now have I not told you that what you mistake for madness is but over-acuteness of the scenes?’ and ‘… if still you think me mad, you will think so no longer when I describe the wise precautions I took for the concealment of the body…’.

Join now!

4.William Acton attitude towards the dead body and the crime surprised us ‘… he had never thought of himself as a sculpture…. He realized by some sculpturing, clenching and re-modeling and twisting of human clay….’ He saw himself as an artist he had physical contact with the dead body. He further saw the murder himself as an artistic creation ‘…yes it was an artistic creation…’ this in itself shows that his attitude was irrational and not a normal reaction.

The opening showed calmness but then Acton began to panic, ‘rush get away….’ Later he became dazed and shocked at himself he ...

This is a preview of the whole essay