In the prologue, Romeo and Juliet are described as a pair of "star cross'd lovers". How appropriate is this description?

Authors Avatar

Oh…from the heavens above, or from the hell below?

In the prologue, Romeo and Juliet are described as a pair of “star cross’d lovers”.  How appropriate is this description?

The origin of the vendetta between the two families has long been forgotten, yet, it has been propagated and affects not just the two ancestral lines involved, but all those around them.  This vital theme which runs throughout the play is what William Shakespeare draws on to attract his audiences.  He wrote a large variety of plays ranging from comedies to romantic love-stories with typical axiom endings where young people fall in love and live happily ever after.  However at the end of the sixteenth century Shakespeare wrote an array of bitter and melancholy plays.  With this unusual approach, he wrote some of his most acclaimed work in which he used numerous literary techniques such as sonnets.

Romeo and Juliet is one of the oldest stories in the world: two young lovers, little more than children, cannot understand the hatred of an older generation that keeps them apart, and choose to die together rather than live without each other.  Apart from the feud, Shakespeare hints the common idea that opposites attract.  The play is built on contrasts: love and hate, peace and conflict, young and old, passion and duty.  All these personalities are played by different characters and many a time does one character show a conflagration of emotions.  Shakespeare’s understanding of the characters goes far beyond the hero and heroine.  He includes the Nurse who is chatty, ambivalent and earthy; Romeo’s friend Mercutio who is quick with his sword and tongue; and even Friar Lawrence who is motivated by the best intentions – to use love to conquer hate.    

I truly feel that fate was the true dictator of events during the swift progression of Romeo and Juliet, however to prove that the occurrences throughout the play weren’t mere coincidences, a study of the two main characters in the play will help me identify this.  The Friar and the Nurse played an important role in the sinister on goings of the play and I think that they weren’t held to their own devices, but like pawns in the overall game that was played by fate.

I personally believe that, even though it is deemed that the Friar is to blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, he was an instrument of fate.  He was only there to do the bidding of fate, and had he not been present, fate would have singled out another character and assigned a similar role.  Right from the word go Shakespeare involves an important yet mystical character in the play.  It cannot speak or move; nevertheless it has this unbreakable grasp on all the characters.  It seems that fate handles the individuals in the play as if they were mere puppets.  The continual reference of fate runs in the forefront of the play as if it were playing follow the leader.  The audience follow the characters that in turn are following destiny itself.

During the course of the play, the Friar performs a chain of actions that lead to the eventual death of the two that are ‘wedded to calamity’.  His fundamental role is a confidante to the infatuated Romeo.  A lot of Romeo’s speech is riddled with oxymoronic language.  Commenting on the recent conflict and embroiled in his own private misery, his speech in Act 1, Scene 1 contains a string of opposites: ‘feather of lead, bright smoke, cold fire, sick health…’  Romeo confides in the Friar and asks him for advice on his love affairs.  These witty paradoxes show that his feelings have a lack of substance and are said with a certain excess of glibness.  Romeo loves the sensation of being in love, revealing his sensually adolescent side. Nonetheless, Friar Lawrence feels that the love for Rosaline is not acute and disregards it.  However, as soon as Romeo’s use of words changes to mark his love for Juliet, the Friar is sparked with an idea.  At first there seems to be no difference when Romeo talks about Juliet:  ‘Arise, fair sun, and kill the envious moon.’  It is the conventional language of love poetry: it was habitual for lovers to speak this way on stage at the time.  The Victorian audiences would love to see such affection being acted out on the stage; therefore many plays of the time were based around sonnets and such language.  Ephemerally, the language becomes more effortless when Romeo begins to express genuine feelings – ‘It is my lady, O it is my love/ O that she knew she were!’   The second part of this quote is particularly effective because it is unfinished.  This leaves a lingering feeling and depicts that Romeo is unable to find words to describe his fathomless love.  

The tension of providence is ominous and lingering in the background as Romeo and other characters make many references to planetary influences.  Romeo has this presentment and sense of doom before going to the Capulet’s party: ‘for my mind misgives some consequence yet hanging in the stars.’  The imagery of the sea also gives this interpretation as Romeo believes that something ‘hath the steerage of my course’ implying that he is no longer in control; or in fact that he was never in control in the first place.  The imagery of religion between Romeo and Juliet is a link to the Friar and his role in the play.  The persistent repetition of celestial and ethereal beauty makes the audience even more sympathetic for they know that the play is going to end in tragedy and the lovers cannot do anything about it as their plight lies in the ‘inauspicious stars’.  The Friar encourages the love that has ‘sprung from hate’ and instead of condemning it, he illustrates a path showing Romeo and Juliet how they can be together and he persuades Romeo to secretly meet with Juliet to consummate their marriage.  

Join now!

Nevertheless, Friar Lawrence isn’t completely irrational.  His motives had many advantages and disadvantages which could have worked in his favour or not.  He initially wanted to reunite two dynasties of Verona.  This motive in itself is justified yet, the Friar hasn’t thought about the other consequences that could follow.  Therefore I have come to believe that the Friar was not able to act on his accord and any decisions he made might have been made by fate.  He wanted to help his friend and moreover a son-like figure, Romeo.  These actions epitomize the Friar as a compassionate and benevolent ...

This is a preview of the whole essay