In what ways is 'A Doll's House' a suitable title for the play?

Authors Avatar

In what ways is ‘A Doll’s House’ a suitable title for the play?

25/09/2002                                                                    Allan Saud

        The title of the play indeed relates strongly to its contents and meaning.  The aura of seclusion, suffocation and isolation created by the title correlates most with Nora’s character in the play.  This is so because we never once see her leave the house, showing that she is just like a doll, not independent enough to do so on her own except for when in the very beginning, when Nora comes back home from doing the shopping, which actually reveals another side to her, that she is always doing things for someone else, more to the point, she is playing a role of the perfect wife for Torvald.  Nora’s playacting of the conventional role of a wife of the nineteenth century is portrayed in many different aspects throughout the play.  The exchange between Mrs. Linde and Krogstad at the beginning of Act Three goes to emphasize the point of seclusion and isolation created within ‘A Doll’s House’.  This is expressed through Krogstad’s line ‘…must our conversation take place in this house?’, and of course this statement is ironic because this is a play to be performed on a one sided stage, which only has one setting, therefore their conversation can physically only be performed at Helmer’s house.  However, Mrs. Linde’s reply; ‘We couldn’t meet at my place; my room has no separate entrance…We’re quite alone…’, together with Krogstad’s confused line mentioned above, show a very important stage in the development of their characters as it shows their unified desire for a separate identity.  Therefore, this restriction in space on stage, actually serves as an advantage to the meaning of the play, in that it shows the contrast between the stronger, more developed characters of Mrs. Linde and Krogstad to most others in the play.    

The fact that we never actually see her (or anybody else for that matter) eating proper food, creates and illusion of an artificial lifestyle, as in a real doll’s house.  Nora tends to be eating macaroons whenever her husband is generous or ignorant of it, this shows two sides of her lifestyle, firstly that she eats macaroons which is not considered real food and secondly, that she has to conform to her husbands wishes, just like a doll is forced to conform to her masters wishes, shown when Torvald starts teaching her about debts in his line ‘A home that is founded on debts and borrowing can never be a place of freedom and beauty…for the few weeks that remain’ and Nora’s reply together with her stage action of moving over to the stove show her to be conforming in the line ‘Very well, Torvald.  As you say.’  Another time when we see Nora conforming is when Torvald exclaims ‘You see, you see!  How right I was not to let you say longer!’ and she mundanely replies ‘Oh, you’re always right, whatever you do’, just to please Helmer.  

Join now!

This exchange between Nora and Helmer at the beginning of the play also adds great irony to the later happenings in the play.  This is so because as we later find out, Helmer’s household is based on debt, except he doesn’t know about it, therefore it is ironic when he says that ‘a home…founded on debts…can never be a place of freedom and beauty’ because of course his house never had any of those virtues to begin with, but it was rather his idealistic illusions which clouded his vision and knowledge.  The way Nora performs the Tarantella for her ...

This is a preview of the whole essay