• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is it possible to work out what happened at the Battle of Marathon from Herodotus' Narrative.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sally Grey 12 Ab Ancient History Essay Is it possible to work out what happened at the Battle of Marathon from Herodotus' Narrative The source we are working from is Herodotus' The Histories. The particular information used to write this essay was taken from Book Six, in which is an account of the Battle of Marathon. According to Herodotus the Plateans put themselves in Athenian hands - while the Athenians were engaged in offering sacrifice to the Twelve Gods the Plateans came to the altar and made their request and the act of surrender was completed. The Thebans heard what the Plateans had done and sent an army against them. The Athenians came to the aid of the Plateans and a fight was only avoided by the intervention of the Corinthians. They resolved the situation, but when the Athenians were on their way home the Boeotians set upon them. There was a fight in which the Athenians were victorious. ...read more.

Middle

He went on to tell him that the decision was his and that he didn't vote in favour of fighting then happiness would be denied of him. Callimachus voted in favour of fighting. Miltiades waited to fight until the day that he held the presiding position. The Athenians charged towards the Persians. The Persians prepared themselves to meet them, but were expecting an easy fight, thinking that the Athenians were mad to risk an assault with so small an army. The Athenians chased the routed enemy until they came to the sea. All but seven ships got away carrying Persians - they hoped to reach Athens before the Athenians. The Athenians got there first and beat the Persians. However, an un - named source says: In 490 BC the most influential man in Athens was Miltiades. This nobleman, whose family had fled from the tyrants and founded a colony in the Thracian Chersoneus from which the Persian advance had driven them, embodied the spirit of resistance. ...read more.

Conclusion

- and years after, people's memories of the battle are going to be fairly poor - things will be exaggerated and confabulated. We also know that Herodotus was pro - Athenian because they adopted him as a story teller - which we must remember he was, hence he deviates from the story. Could it be tht he was employed by the Athenians to write an account of the battle, writing favourably about them? In conclusion I would say that while Herodotus' works give us a rough idea of what happened in the Battle of Marathon, we must not trust what we read, and the help of simplified accounts will help to make the event clear in our heads. However, these accounts are based on his works so we cannot wholly trust any account and so yes, we can work out some of what happened in the Battle of Marathon because some things have been backed up by scientific evidence, but no, we can not work out the entire happenings of the battle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why did William win at the Battle of Hastings?

    (William the Conqueror- Philip Ardagh) Harold lacked the leadership qualities of William and it is puzzling to many historians why he never retreated during parts of the battle when he was not doing well. "One suggestion is that Harold felt doomed from the start and wanted to make this a final stand for himself and the proud families of England.

  2. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    The article also reflects on the public's attitude towards how well Britain is doing in the Battle. Also the extract is primary evidence so all the facts are clear and not misinterpreted by the journalist. The weaknesses of the article are that the paper is biased towards Britain omitting facts that make Hitler's men look good.

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    take to the air knowing they faced almost certain death, but knowing the alternative would be even worse. Despite the problems the pilots faced, it is amazing just what can be achieved when there really is nothing left to lose.

  2. Consider the way in which Shakespeare presents Martius in the early part of the ...

    between Martius and his great adversary Aufidius, in which Martius gains the upper hand and comes away a hero.

  1. English Short Story

    Duty was his religion, and like the Moslem he proselyted with the sword. His missionary efforts were directed chiefly against the spiritual darkness of his superiors in rank, though he would turn aside from pursuit of his erring commander to set a chicken-thieving orderly astride a wooden horse, with a heavy stone attached to each foot.

  2. English Short story

    " We laughed at the captain--just why we could probably not have explained--and that afternoon when he was shot to rags from an ambuscade Brayle remained by the body for some time, adjusting the limbs with needless care--there in the middle of a road swept by gusts of grape and canister!

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    12 Group defended the Midlands and East Anglia and was led by Air Vice-Marshal Trafford Leigh-Mallory. Finally, 13 Group covered the north of England, Scotland and Northern Ireland and was commanded by Air Vice-Marshal Richard Saul. The Group areas were subdivided into Sectors, each commanding between two and four squadrons.

  2. Diagnostic essay on 'Waterloo' by Raymond Garlick

    He agrees that while "all have their cenotaphs", it is not a "true memorial" as the wheat upon which the soldiers died. It could be suggested, that the speaker slightly degenerates the value of the monuments, calling them "man-made" and implying there are many of them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work