• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Essay Is it right to describe that Edward the Confessor as a failure? There were many problems in Edward's reign from 1042-1066. Stafford argues that some of his problems had no obvious solutions. Some historians argue that Edward was not a failure, as he was able to maintain a good relationship with the Godwines. He was also able to solve the problem of not having enough supporters and was able to defend his kingdom in case of any invasion in England. According to Barlow, Edward was also able to maintain peace within his kingdom in the latter part of the reign. This view is supported by ASC and the Vita. However, other historians argue that Edward was a failure as he was unable to deal on the long term with the power of the Godwines and was unable to solve the problem of the succession. Edward's failure is shown with the succession issue as both the Norman sources and English sources have in agreement that Edward did not have a consistent policy on the succession. Some historians argue that Edward should not be described as a failure. This was shown, as he was able to defend England in case of any invasion from other countries. This view is agreed by Barlow1 who describes Edward defending England and Denmark making an alliance with Swein against Magnus of Norway. Barlow says that "Edward always took command whenever possible of an invasion." This view is supported by the author of Vita 2 who describes Edward as, "the protector of his land and people." Barlow says that Ailred3 agrees with this view. This shows that the evidence is trustworthy. According to Barlow, Edward dealt with foreign policy, by stopping William from forming an alliance with Flanders. This was because Flanders and Normandy had maritime power and if they formed an alliance, they would have been able to share maritime power and help Swein, Magnus or Harold Hardrada from invading England. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore it is most probable that Barlow is giving an accurate account. Therefore, it is right to describe Edward as a failure, as he was unable to make Godwine fear him. Edward's achievement of putting Godwine into exile was only a short-term success as Edward was unable to expel them in 1052. Edward was not able to expel the Godwines as he did not have support from Siward and Leofric. Historians such as Barlow and Stenton agree that Edward had no alternative but to allow the Godwines to return in 1052. In addition Godwine had much support from Wessex and the London citizens. Stafford1 describes that he 'was not swept back on a tide of popular enthusiasm.' However, the Vita2 contradicts the view of Stafford and agrees with ASC (D) mentioning 'the whole city went out to help and protect the earl.' According to Stafford3, Ralf and Odda were supposed to receive reinforcements and help resist the Godwine's army, but by the time Edward's army had assembled, Godwine's army had already arrived London. Therefore, it is likely to describe Edward as a failure as he was unable to mobilize an army, lacking as he did the support of Leofric and Siward. Harold became Earl of Wessex, after Godwine died in 1053. Edward was unable to stop Harold from becoming over mighty and allowed him to gain more land. Tostig was then appointed to Northumbria in 1055 after Siward's died, and in 1057 Harold took over from Ralf in the Welsh marchers. By 1057 therefore all the earldoms except for Mercia were in the hand of the Godwines, so was a failure as he was unable to stop Harold from becoming over mighty. Campbell4 agrees with the view and supported by Stenton5, 'Harold had a great deal of influence in southern England, where the centre of national authority lay.' Furthermore, Edward was unable to deal with Welsh and Scottish Affairs, but instead had to depend on Harold. ...read more.

Conclusion

1 Anglo Saxon Chronicle D 2 James Campbell, Anglo Saxon England, pg 222 3 Pauline Stafford, Unification and Conquest, pg 89 4 Frank Stenton, Anglo Saxon England, pg.572, Oxford University Press, 2001. 5 Simon Schama, A History of Britain, pg. 81 Schama also includes, that he built, 'Norman Romanesque basilica,' and 'Edward was also taking advantage of the movement that placed abbeys and monasteries under direct royal patronage.' BBC Worldwide Ltd, 1992. 1 Edited and translated by Barlow, The Life of King Edward, 2 Barlow, Edward the Confessor, pg 202, Yale University Press,1997 3 Schama, A History of Britain, pg. 78, BBC Worldwide Ltd, 1992. 1 Barlow, The Feudal Kingdom of England 1042-1216, pg 45. Longman, 1999. 2 Stafford, Unification and Conquest, pg.86, Stafford says, 'William of Malmesbury tells how Edward was so uncertain of his situation that he considered returning to Normandy and was only persuaded to remain in England by Godwine, who offered to bolster his security,' and a similar thing is said by Florence of Worcester, according to Stafford. 3 Stafford, Unification and Conquest, pg 83 4 Anglo Saxon Chronicle D 5 Stafford, Unification and Conquest, pg 84 1 Pauline Stafford, Unification and Conquest, pg. 91 2 R.Allen Brown, The Vita Edwardi Regis, pg. 43-46, Edward Arnold 3 Pauline Stafford, Unification and Conquest, pg.91. 4 Campbell, Anglo Saxon England, pg229. 5 Stenton, Anglo-Saxon England, pg. 572. Oxford University Press, 2001. 6 Campbell, Anglo Saxon England, pg. 229. 1 Schama, A History of Britain, pg. 82 2 Barlow, Edward the Confessor, pg. 253 Barlow says that the Vita believed that Edward suffered from a mental illness. Yale University Press, 1997. 3 Loyn, 4 Schama 5 Adam of Bremen, History of the Archbishops of Hamburg,, pg. 108 1 Wilkinson and Cantrell, The Normans in Britain, pg. 7 (William of Jumieges account), Macmillan Education LTD, 1987. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. Discuss how the climatic scenes from Edward Scissorhands and Sleepy Hollow make use of ...

    The camera is slanted, slightly altering the way the audience see the frame. The head takes up about two thirds off the frame with the stepmother in the other third, a technique used regularly by Tim Burton. The colours contrast as the head is full of dull muted colours where

  2. Discuss the effectiveness of the opening ofTim Burton's 'Edward Scissorhands'

    This gives a sense of revisiting a familiar place. The night shots introduce the three main parts of the film, swooping between each one, and the sudden cut to daytime suburbia signals the beginning of the tale. Because she is the first person the camera follows in the tale, the audience feels attached to Peg and empathises with her.

  1. On What Basis were the various claims to the throne made in 1066?

    Catholic Church and would result in the possibility of a holy war with the pope. Not only through this oath did William put the Pope under pressure and gain the Pope's support, but also through the fact that he had conquered all of the surrounding land of the Vatican and

  2. What were the reasons behind Harold's visit to Normandy and How was the Visit ...

    himself during the crisis of 1051 and 1052 hence the reason why William still held on to the two hostages who were close relations to Harold. However unknown to William was the fact that Robert of Jumieges had fled to Normandy for fear of his life because of his ill

  1. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    There are lots of references to various religious things made by Richard and Buckingham, giving a false impression of Richard, as we all know he hates religion. He plays such an excellent role as an actor within an actor here that we are influenced by his love of religion, though he is mocking religion at the same time.

  2. How strong was the monarchy on the death of Edward IV in 1483?

    A testament to Edward's improved power was the sign of the reduction in corrupt subjects with far fewer attainders being issued in his second reign. The very fact that Edward could perpetrate frauds with major landed inheritances, as he did with the Mowbray and Exeter lands, shows the extent to

  1. How effective was Edward IV's domestic government from 1471?

    doing and that his decisions were respected because monarchs for the next 300 years followed his example in this matter, showing his effectiveness. Edward was vigorous with the use of the commissions of 'Oyer et Terminer' (translates - To hear, to determine)

  2. Why were the crises of 1051 and 1052 significant?

    But it was more then likely this fault of caring too much for his family that caused another row between the two. Godwin's eldest, Swein, to put it in a nutshell, was bizarre. Swein was made an exile from the country by Edward for raping a nun and holding her hostage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work