• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

IS JOHN PROCTOR A HERO? John Proctor is inimitable in the play, and historically is seen as an exception to the regulations of the theocracy and the witch-trials which gripped Salem during 1692.

Extracts from this document...


IS JOHN PROCTOR A HERO? John Proctor is inimitable in the play, and historically is seen as an exception to the regulations of the theocracy and the witch-trials which gripped Salem during 1692. On this account, that Proctor is an honest, hard-working man who stands up against the hypocrisy of the court, he can be deemed a hero of the town for it was Proctor that put up the biggest fight against the trials. One possible view of John Proctor is that he follows the structure of being a tragic hero, which defines The Crucible as being a classical tragedy. Proctor fights against the abuse of authority shown by Danforth in his running of the trials and Reverend Parris in his running of the theocracy, highlighted by his refusal to allow Parris to baptise his third child: "I like it not that Mr Parris should lay his hand upon my baby. I see no light of God in that man, I'll not conceal it". ...read more.


He also threatens Abigail Williams in the extra scene of the play, but since she is launching a slander campaign and trying to have his wife hanged, his aggression towards her is understandable. After all, Proctor seems to be the most rational character in the play in his views on the trials and the hysteria engulfing the town. One of Proctor's strengths, though and something which does endorse his heroic aspect is the strength and upright honesty he displays no matter what the situation. Even with his life threatened Proctor still displays the determination to keep his reputation and his family name intact and untarnished. This eventually leads to his downfall though. His stand in the final scene against the court which sentences him to the gallows is a great moral as well as personal stand, for he will never admit to having 'compacted' with the devil, and even gives his life in order to preserve the truth. ...read more.


in 1956 and refusing to name those who were believed to be communists or communist sympathisers. Both stand against the authorities and both are duly punished, be it Proctor's hanging or the Miller's 30 day suspended jail sentence and $500 fine. If Miller wished Proctor to be viewed as a tragic or flawed hero then he would be in effect mirroring views of himself since the two are so closely linked. If John Proctor is a hero then so is Arthur Miller, and in the extract from the Observer by Arthur Miller telling why and how he wrote the play it seems that he does not want to be viewed as the hero of the McCarthyism soap opera story of the 50's. This is why I do not think John Proctor is a hero. His actions in the play are heroic nonetheless, but the label of being a hero carries a certain responsibility that I do not think John Proctor fully displays, if Proctor was indeed intentionally meant as a hero then he is a deeply flawed one at that. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is John Proctor a good man?

    4 star(s)

    accused because of the fact that Abigail is jealous of Elizabeth and wishes to usurp her position as proctor's lover by getting rid of Elizabeth by any means possible. It is because of Proctors affair that Abigail feels this way.

  2. Do you consider John Proctor to be a modern tragic hero?

    The magistrate sits in your heart that judges you," meaning Proctor is punishing himself for his sins, and channelling his guilt by blaming his wife. In this interaction with Elizabeth we truly see how insecure and weak Proctor is, a far cry from the strong outward appearance he shows to others.

  1. To what extent was Abigail Williams responsible for the Salem witch trials? In ...

    they did she used her skills in acting and her initiative to deal with the problems. As we look at Act 3 we see that Mary confesses to the fact that she and the others had in fact been lying, about seeing spirits and being attacked by them.

  2. Proctor, hero or Villain?

    his house" Proctor has also been dutiful regarding his responsibilities to the church. He has made his contribution as he has "Nailed the roof upon the church and hung the church door" proctor can now be seen in a new light, his acts of helping the community show that Proctor cannot be classed as a villain but a hero.

  1. To what extent can John Proctor be described as a tragic hero in Arthur ...

    illustrates the fact that he will stand by his morals even if that means opposing those with the power to have him executed. There is no doubt that Proctor is introduced as a heroic, steadfast figure. This then leads to the audience giving John their respect.

  2. To what extent can 'The Crucible' be viewed as a Classical Tragedy?

    and reputation to save Elizabeth, he calls Abigail a whore and confesses his sin, '(trembling his life collapsing about him): I have Known her, sir. I have known her.' Elizabeth is then called to court to confirm or deny this.

  1. Is John Proctor a hero in his stand against evil in his society or ...

    Elizabeth asks Proctor to go to Salem and tell that court that the children's sickness has nothing to do with witchcraft and that Abigail is a fraud. But as the topic of Abigail develops, we begin to see the distance in their marriage.

  2. John Proctor is the tragic hero of "The Crucible". Discuss

    to become angrier and angrier until eventually he might have used violence. At one time in the play, he threatened to whip his wife, Elizabeth when friendly discussion was not working. Proctor was probably always a soft-spoken man, and probably tended to keeping his thoughts in his head and to himself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work