• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Is John Proctor A Tragic Hero?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Is John Proctor A Tragic Hero?' Stephanie Morville What is a tragic hero? The most well known definition of a tragic hero comes from the great philosopher, Aristotle. When depicting a tragic hero, Aristotle states "The change in the hero's fortunes be not from misery to happiness, but on the contrary, from happiness to misery, and the cause of it must not lie in any wickedness but in some great error on his part." In addition, he explains the four essential qualities that a tragic hero should possess, which are goodness, appropriateness, lifelike, and consistency. All of these necessities help to classify the character of John Proctor as the tragic hero of the play. Not only does he unfortunately fall to desolation, but also his character captures the sympathy and pity from the audience or readers. A tragic hero is also known to be someone who brings about their own death, through a flaw within their character or through their actions. Proctor's downfall in the play is initiated by a human error, which to a great extent qualifies him to be the tragic hero. Is John Proctor a tragic hero? In this essay I will be exploring his character, personality, and relationship towards others. ...read more.

Middle

Other stage directions in this short exchange highlight Abigail's manipulative and dissembling nature as she changes from anger, to softness, to seducing and finally to sadness. Proctor eventually becomes angry, when Abigail calls Elizabeth 'a cold snivelling woman'. Proctors anger is shown in his next line, '(shaking her): do you look for a whipping?' This shows Proctor is offended somewhat by Abigail's remark. We can see that Proctor is a strong man with a strange sense of social and individual conscience. Proctor has a 'sharp and biting way with hypocrites' and stands up for his beliefs. For this reason, he creates enemies in the Putnam's; particularly Mr. Putnam to whom he refuses to defer. His proud nature is demonstrated with his interaction with Mr. Putnam in Act1. (The audience also dislike these characters, as if to respect Proctor's judgements.) Look at the way he stands up to Putnam over issues of land 'you cannot command Mr. Parris we vote by name in this society, not by acreage' Proctor will not be undermined by the wealthy Putnam's or by the Church, which the protagonist sees as hypocritical. It is this pride that the audience respect and admire. However, the audience sympathise with Proctor because of his weakness. Miller creates an imperfect character who can be regarded as an 'everyman' so that the audience understand his actions. ...read more.

Conclusion

Elizabeth then ends with 'He have his goodness now, God forbid I take it from him'. Conclusion After the affair with Abigail, Proctor felt shamed by Elizabeth's self-control, as well as a huge feeling of guilt. John Proctor was not the same man to himself as he was to others. In a way, their admiration revolted him. This was because he was disgusted with himself. John Proctor judged himself harshly. Before Abigail came and ruined his peace, he was always sure of himself. After Abigail, he was sure that nothing he would ever do would be pure and honest again. Proctor's "tragic hero" status was illustrated by his efforts to save his wife from being put to death, his attempt to prove the children are making fraudulent claims, and his unwillingness to confess to practicing witchcraft when accused. Personally I believe all humans are created with flaws, which control our emotions and often twist our lives. We are put into predications because we are having a hard time of controlling them; therefore we just let them flow. John Proctor's flaws were his faith, the belief of his own dignity, and his pride, that eventually put in to death. He is a tragic hero that dies of his own flaw, which brought up our sympathy and our fear of death. The End. ?? ?? ?? ?? Steff Morville ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is John Proctor a good man?

    4 star(s)

    After deliberating with Elizabeth whether he should he finally does and puts it down in writing. Danforth then asks for the paper to show to the rest of the town as propaganda. Proctor then sees what he is about to do and refuses and gives this answer as to why he does.

  2. How does John Proctor change throughout the play? Does Act Four show him as ...

    It is like a visible subtext that neither of them wishes to confront. We can tell that Elizabeth knows about this, but chooses to ignore it, and so we are angered to find that she is submissive to her husband, something 21st century women and men deeply resent and so

  1. How and why does Arthur Miller encourage audience sympathy for John Proctor

    Again, Proctor may be doing the wrong thing by not attending church and criticising the minister, but he has strong beliefs and he stands by them, and he refuses to believe what he can't see; first, that Parris is a good, holy man, and later in the play, that people in the community are practising witchcraft.

  2. Is John Proctor a Good Man in Arthur Miller's Crucible?

    Miller is telling the audience that people like him who did get imprisoned were making the real sacrifice and doing the right thing whereas those who accused others were weak like Mary Warren and too cowardly to be imprisoned. John's refusal to name other people who he has supposedly seen

  1. To what extent can John Proctor be described as a tragic hero in Arthur ...

    John is said to be "...another man, bearded, filthy, his eyes misty as though webs had overgrown them," (p.123) an obvious discrepancy from his initial condition. Thus, John's physical delineation is an apparent parallel to the changes he emotionally undergoes making him a dynamic character.

  2. I have given you my soul. Leave me my name: What kind of character ...

    I think Proctor feels shocked and feel disgust towards Mary who thinks that she can belittle him. Proctor has a lot of respect for Reverend Hale and he feels quite threatened and nervous although he tries to keep in his good books.

  1. Do you consider John Proctor to be a modern tragic hero?

    he remains respected in the village, he himself feels undeserving of such respect because of the sins he has committed. As such, his fear of public humiliation is so great that he is reluctant to act when Elizabeth urges him.

  2. Examine miller's presentation of the marriage of John and Elizabeth proctor in the crucible. ...

    Privacy was quickly interpreted to mean that people had some terrible fault to hide and there was an intense pressure for neighbours to reveal each other's sins. Here is evidence of how the play's title is reflected in the actions and words of the characters.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work