• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

It can be argued that the central concern of King Lear is the nature of a particular form of evil: anger. Aristotle defined anger as: ... an impulse

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The central concern of tragedy has always been to explore the nature of evil in the world; both its existence and the nature of particular types of evil and their effect. If we are to find the meaning of Shakespeare's tragedies, we must examine how men looked at the problem of evil in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Much of the philosophy which under-pinned the English Renaissance can be traced to the ideas of Aristotle. It can be argued that the central concern of King Lear is the nature of a particular form of evil: anger. Aristotle defined anger as: ... an impulse, accompanied by pain, to a conspicuous revenge for a conspicuous slight directed without justification towards what concerns oneself or towards what concerns one's friends. Aristotle argued that anger always arises from injured self-esteem, from some slight inflicted upon the individual directly or indirectly, there being three kinds of slighting possible: contempt; spite; and insolence. Since a man expects to be respected by his inferiors, he expects those to respect him to whom he is superior in birth, capacity goodness or anything else. Furthermore, he expects those whom he has treated well, as well as those whom he is now treating well, to respect him. According to Aristotle, then, the man who is slighted by those who he thinks ought to respect him and feel grateful toward him is the more easily offended. ...read more.

Middle

Lear distributes Cordelia's dower to his two flattering daughters, and gives away the burdens of state, he retains The name, and all the addition to a king, and thus we see that pride will still be panoplied with the trappings of a king. His pride and self-esteem are so mingled with anger and his desire for revenge, in this speech, that they become one. It is Kent who, once again, tries to check Lear's rashness by a combination of righteous anger and pleading for the love of Cordelia. Even Lear's threat to his life does not prevent him from trying to protect Lear from himself. Even as Lear lays his hand upon his sword, Kent exclaims again: Kill thy physician, and thy fee bestow Upon the foul disease. Revoke thy gift; Or, whilst I can vent clamour from my throat I'll tell thee thou dost evil. And now, just as he did to Cordelia, he turns in pride and outrageous anger to revenge himself on his most loyal friend, who, like Cordelia, has refused to play the part of flatterer but has instead insisted upon trying to save him from evil and folly by telling him the truth. That Lear's anger has led him to a course that is both evil and foolish is at once evident in the discussion between Goneril and Regan that follows the departure of Cordelia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lear continually recounts the good he has done and the gratitude that is owed to him, while Goneril and Regan forget altogether the benefits they have received and fail to be grateful for them. Whilst both the givers and receivers are guilty, it is Lear himself who must bear the greater responsibility; there can be no doubt that he gave, not that which he prized for himself, but that for which he had no further use. Gratitude was not, therefore, due to him for his good turn. However, this does not excuse the behaviour of Goneril and Regan: whilst Lear should not expect gratitude, their behaviour is indeed shameful because they show no gratitude whatsoever to Lear for giving them what they so eagerly desired. Since it is ingratitude that particularly injures our self-esteem, the result is the rousing of violent anger in the one who feels that his own good deeds have not been appreciated. His exiling of Cordelia was in response to her perceived slighting of him; now at Goneril's first suggestion that he restrain his followers a little, he feels contempt thrown upon his own goodness: Ingratitude, thou marble-headed fiend, More hideous when thou show'st thee in a child Than the sea-monster. and, the depth of his hurt and his anger is more than evident in his cursing of Goneril: ...that she may feel How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is To have a thankless child! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE King Lear essays

  1. "Power, property and inheritance"(Steve Dollimore). Do you consider these to be the central concerns ...

    He uses the same way to power as Regan and Goneril, but from lower in the ladder. He is the most cunning and machiavelian character in the play. Edgar is the only oe in the play who receives power in a natural way, without searching for it.

  2. Discuss the notion of appearance and reality in the play King Lear.

    It might appear for someone that when Kent accuses the king of 'hideous rashness' he is showing lack of respect towards his sovereign. Kent accepts banishment without any rancour and immediately assumes a disguise, applies to Lear for a job, so that he can continue to follow and serve Lear.

  1. The Storm Scene (Act 3.2) And The Scenes In The Hovel/Farmhouse That Follow (Act ...

    The atmosphere should be very dark, and the only light from the moon and lightening. The Fool, a minor character, I believe to be stood in the background, with his head facing downwards, slouching slightly, with saturated clothes. This will set a melancholy mood and show the viewer immediately that this scene is very angry and emotional.

  2. Character Analyses - King Lear

    When queried by Lear as to his identity, Kent replies that he is "a man" (I.4.10). Thus, he is no one special, and yet, he stands apart from many other men. Kent is a man defined by integrity, whose goodness is immeasurable, as is his love for his king.

  1. A Consideration of the way Shakespeare presents and develops the theme of blindness in ...

    Lear emerges from his torment not only able to see more clearly but a more humble, loving, self-critical character. He learns, through his madness, how to distinguish between appearance and reality.

  2. Do you agree that Shakespeare was a product of his time whose plays have ...

    "Each play of Shakespeare is the development of a metaphor or group of metaphors. There is a matrix out of which feeling finds words, emotions take shape and voices become characters. That which is referred to most often- in metaphors, images, allusions and statements- is usually for Shakespeare what is significant" (Rehder 1980 p56)

  1. An Analysis of the Role of Comedy in Shakespeares Great Tragedy King Lear

    He makes jokes at Edmund?s expense about how he was conceived outside wedlock, Gloucester being quite crude about Edmund and things he had no control over. ?there was Good sport at his making? This gives people the impression that Gloucester lacks self-control and discipline.

  2. Filial ingratitude is a dominant theme in King Lear.

    The filial greed and ingratitude shown by Edmund, Regan, and Goneril bring immense suffering to all. The play begins by an unusual incident. King Lear wants to divide his kingdom among his three daughters because he has become too old to rule.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work