John Proctor is a very flawed man. How, in spite of this, does Miller develop his character so that

Authors Avatar

John Proctor is a very flawed man. How, in spite of this, does Miller develop his character so that we admire him more and more as the play progresses?

“The Crucible” by Arthur Miller parallels McCarthyism in the 1950’s. McCarthyism took place during the cold war, where Senator Joseph McCarthy was pressured into taking part in a communist witch hunt. Anyone who was believed to be taking part in “left wing” events, or having left wing opinions was called up before the makeshift court and threatened with further trouble, unless they named anybody else who may be involved. This was very similar to the witch trials held in Salem, where “The Crucible” was set, where the accused risk being hanged unless they named others, often their closest friends, who may be involved with witchcraft.

Arthur Miller was accused of having left wing opinions, and engaging in left wing activities, therefore he was called up in front of the court. He was given the opportunity to walk free if he named some more people who he believed to have left wing views. However, like John Proctor he refused to name his friends. Fortunately for Miller, McCarthyism came to and end soon after this, and nothing else happened to Miller, however in “The Crucible” John Proctor wasn’t so lucky and was hanged for not confessing to witchcraft, or confessing other people.

John Proctor’s first appearance in “The Crucible” is in act one, we see from the start that he is a flawed man from Miller’s description of him. Miller describes him as “a sinner… against his own vision of decent conduct”. We learn the nature of his sins from his conversation with Abigail, where he tries to hide the fact something went on between them, by claiming, “We never touched”. However, she does manager to make him admit his feelings for her, although he says, “I will cut off my hand before I’ll ever reach for you again”. This proves to us he truly wants to atone for his sin.

Proctor’s arguments later in act one with Parris and the Putnams justify Miller’s description of him having “a sharp and biting way with hypocrites”. Proctor reminds Putnam that the amount of land he owns is irrelevant, and “he cannot command Mr. Parris”. Proctor shows a little common sense when he dismisses all the talk of witchcraft by walking out of Parris’ home. In this time, Parris, Putnam and Hale all loose their senses and begin to believe in witchcraft, and even encouraging the girls to blame the villagers who they did not approve of for witchcraft.

Join now!

In Act Two, the conversation we see Proctor and his wife Elizabeth engage in makes it clear to us they are in a very strained and cold marriage. Proctor desperately tries to atone for his sin and earn forgiveness from not only Elizabeth, but also himself. Proctor must learn that for Elizabeth to forgive him, he has to forgive himself, he firmly believes that Elizabeth judges him, saying, “still an everlasting funeral marches around your heart”. The metaphorical language here is used to emphasis how much Proctor really is punishing himself, and he cannot learn to forgive himself. Elizabeth ...

This is a preview of the whole essay