• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Julius Caersar - Analysis of Brutus

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Julius Caersar - Analysis of Brutus In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the character Marcus Brutus fits the definition of the tragic hero. Like other tragic heroes, he had great promise, ability, and integrity of character. He had a tragic flaw. He had a lust for power, and he died at the end of the play. Brutus had great promise, ability, and strength of character. The fact that he could single-handedly take over the group of conspirators, and completely overrule Cassius demonstrates his strength of character, and his influence on others. Brutus's tragic flaw was that he was too trusting. He frankly and honestly felt that he had had to kill Caesar in order to save Rome from tyranny. He trusted Antony not to blame the conspirators in his speech at Caesar's funeral. Antony broke that promise and got Brutus and the others into deep trouble. Brutus also trusted Cassius. Cassius only asked Brutus to be a part of the conspiracy as a way of getting closer to Caesar. He never suspected that Brutus would take over the group and become their leader. Cassius thought that he was getting someone to lead the men, but that he would still be the head man. Brutus, however, took all power away from Cassius, and Cassius no longer had any say in the happenings of the group. Brutus had a conscience. It was obvious that Brutus felt terrible about Caesar's death, but he felt that it was the only way to keep peace in Rome. ...read more.

Middle

Brutus also declares to himself that his role in the conspiracy is to save Rome. He says to the people that, "If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more."(Act 3,scene 2,ll.21-24). If Brutus was not in the plot of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the conspiracy would probably not have worked. Since Brutus "...loved Rome more."(Act 3,scene2, ll.23-24), he decided to be a part of the conspiracy. If he hadn't loved Rome more than Caesar, he would not have joined in the assassination of Julius Caesar. Cassius and the rest of the conspirators would probably not have continued on without Brutus because they would have no "insurance" afterwards. The people would think that there was no reason for Caesar's death and most likely beheaded all the conspirators. Also, if Brutus was not in the play, the whole end of the play would not ever occur. Brutus would not be there to have an army or kill himself, and Cassius will already be beheaded. If Brutus was not in the play, the title would have absolutely no meaning. Marcus Brutus was a good friend to Julius Caesar, but not good enough. He had moral values dealing with Rome and its people. Brutus' values then made him join a conspiracy against Caesar put together by Cassius. Brutus joined this mainly because he didn't want Caesar to turn his back on Rome so there would be a reasonable reason for killing Caesar. ...read more.

Conclusion

Brutus also feels that Caesar is being given too much power and will destroy Rome's democracy. Brutus' reason for killing Caesar is to benefit Rome, he proves this when he states"If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more." After losing to Mark Antony and Octavious, Brutus runs onto his own sword. He sticks to his beliefs, not altering them for others. Cassius is the leader of the conspirators. He is jealous of the power that Caesar holds and wants for himself. Caesar says that Cassius"...Cassius has a lean and hungry look. He thinks to much. Such men are dangerous.", meaning that he looks sneaky and is not to be trusted. The whole idea to kill Caesar begins with Cassius, he convinces the other Senators to do as he wishes. Cassius commits suicide because he is afraid of what will happen to him if Mark Antony and Octavius find him. Another reason for his suicide is because he believes that his men have lost the battle and he does not want to face the consequences. Brutus is the more honorable man because he continues to act upon his beliefs. He never gives in to the ideas of others forced upon him, like Cassius' idea to kill Caesar because of jealousy and to receive power from the act. Brutus stated that his role in Caesar's murder was to help Rome not himself specifically. Even his enemy Mark Antony says of him "This was the noblest Roman of them all." To be known as honorable by your enemies is to definitely be an honorable man ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How is Brutus Presented as a Tragic Hero

    4 star(s)

    here he is shown to have ordered a man's punishment for taking bribes, Cassius then attempts to persuade him otherwise and Brutus is cross and surprised at Cassius for fighting on the case of such a man. This shows how Brutus refused to change his decisiveness or allow his nobility

  2. Who is the real hero of ‘Julius Caesar’?

    Poor man! I know he would not be a wolf, But that he sees the Romans are but sheep: He were no lion, were not Romans hinds. Those that with haste will make a mighty fire Begin it with weak straws: what trash is Rome, What rubbish and what offal,

  1. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    orator has, which is ironical as he has the intelligence, reputation, and gesture to easily persuade the plebeians. The response from the plebeians it that they want to destroy the conspirators homes; "We'll house of the Brutus." If Antony were a "plain blunt man" then he would have not been able to persuade the plebeians so easily.

  2. Julius Caesar- Mark Antony speech - Analysis

    by stating 'But Brutus says that he was ambitious, / And Brutus is an honourable man'. He states this in between mentioning Caesar's good qualities and arguing that 'he hath brought many captives home to Rome/ Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. / Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?'.

  1. Julius Caesar

    Anthony uses a different method, he doesn't simply persuade he also used sarcasm and irony (as mentioned previously) with that he says, "Brutus says Caesar was ambitious, yet Brutus is an honourable man."

  2. In William Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar", honour is displayed as a main theme throughout the ...

    and Cassius says, " How scaped I killing when I crossed you so? O insupportable and touching loss! Upon what sickness?" Cassius asks lots of questions he wants to know how she has died but Brutus just wants to stop talking about her.

  1. Comparing Brutus and Antony’s Speech

    he isn't as honourable as Brutus, he is like the crowd, and the crowd can easily relate to him. Antony subtly incites the crowd to mutiny "If I were as good a speaker as Brutus, I would, be able to stir you up to mutiny," this causes the crowd to think if they should mutiny, and the outcome of one.

  2. Compare Shakespeare's presentation of the characters Brutus and Mark Antony. Julius Caesar was written ...

    This isn't normal behaviour nowadays. Mark Antony does the same after Caesar's death. He allows himself a singular point over which he releases his pent up grieve and after that, Caesar's name was never mentioned by him in mourning again.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work