Julius Caesar
Despite the Roman setting the themes and issues of Julius Caesar would have been relevant to the England of Shakespeare’s time in a number of ways.
Until Caesar's time Rome was ruled as a republic. This meant that the city was ruled by a senate, which was similar to a council which was made up of only the noblest of people. This may be why Brutus thought that he could get away with the murder of Caesar.
Caesar wanted too much power , he was good friends with “Pompey the great” and a noble man who ruled over the senate. Because Caesar wanted as much power as possible he got rid of Pompey so that he could take over and rule on his own. This wasn't a very good idea because it could have led to civil war.
Murellus: “Wherefore rejoice?................
That needs must light on this ingratitude.”
Here we see how some of the public were opposed to the idea of Caesar killing Pompey and taking over his position. But they weren't willing to take there opinions any further but if they had it may of led to a civil war. Shakespeare wrote this play in much the same way he had wrote his other plays to put across a certain point, the point in this play was to the people of his time that if you got rid of a person in power who ruled over people, it could lead to civil war. You could say that Caesar was lucky in defeating Pompey. If the public had seen this as a threat or a wrong doing then they may of rebelled against him and over thrown him. Because Caesar was now in absolute power of Pompeys position and with his friend in the senate, he used his influence to make and re-enforce new rules which he personally made up. Shakespeare may have tried to show the public of his time what was going on with such things as treachery and the stabbing in the back of the Monarchs. He may have been trying to warn the people that this may be about to happen to them in the future.