• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Julius Caesar - Compare the speaches of Brutus and Antony.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

PLAN: *HISTORY PLAY BY WILLAM SHAKESPEAKER (BASED ON TRAGEDY) * SHOWING THIS PLATS RELENVANCE TO THE ELIZABETHAN AND TODAY'S AUDIENCE. (SOCIAL, MORAL, PHILOSOPHICAL) * BRUTUS SPEECH: LANGUAGE AND LITERAY FEATURES I.E USE OF RHETORICAL QUESTIONS. * ANTHONY SPEECH: SIMARLIY AND DIFFERNECE IN LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC FEAURES I.E SENSES, EMOTIVEAND PROSDIC. * CONCLUSION This historic play which was written by William Shakespeare in the 16 century as a play is in fact based on older history dating back to time before Christ. When the roman empire was the most powerful in the world and a man named Julius Caesar was the roman statesman and general who ruled it. William Shakespeare however changes the historic accounts to some point in order for the Elizabethan audience of that time to fully understand and appreciate the story, as well to make it more entertaining. Like us Elizabethans wanted excitement and entertainment in their lives. People of all backgrounds rich and poor would go to the theatre to enjoy the thrills of comedies and tragedies by the finest writers of that age. ...read more.

Middle

In asking a question like this, he's making it hard for the crowd to answer without making it seem as if they are traitors and to anyone insulted by his speech he poses the question; "Who is here so base that would be a bondman?" He stresses the point, by using emotive language, repeating the line; "If any speak, for have I offended" Then goes on to say: "I pause for a reply". This allows them to respond to his rhetorical questions, giving them an even greater sense that he cares about them and their opinions. They can only respond; "None, Brutus, none" They do not disagree or argue with his words or actions. Mark Anthony makes a big entrance with the body of Caesar. This has a huge impact on the crowd and Brutus is forced to leave before finishing his speech. Antony begins by explaining that all he wants is to bury Caesar, not praise him. Antonym says that he does not wish to disgrace Brutus' "honorable" name. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mark Antony is therefore able to show his emotion openly, passionately and unashamedly to the crowd. Brutus, on the other hand hides his feelings so can seem rather cold and dispassionate. Mark Antony uses another 'prop' Caesar's 'will' which he uses finally to entice the crowd by referring to the will, which offered seventy five drachmas to each citizen as well as Caesar's land to be used as a public park At first, the people were against Antony, due to Brutus' pervious speech. Antony did an excellent job of persuading the crowd and moving them which was his original purpose, Although it was Antony's appeal to the crowds emotion that ultimately swayed them to his side. In conclusion, both Brutus and Antony's speeches were very important to the drama so that their audience can see how easily manipulated the plebeians were. This enables Mark Antony to move the crowd to avenge Caesar's death through civil war and finally the suicides of Brutus and Mark Antony. ADIL ELMI Page 1 5/1/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. With close reference to the text explain how Mark Antony manipulates the crowd after ...

    was let Antony speak first so he knew what he was up against. I disagree with Dr Stanley wells on his opinion that Brutus should let Antony speak first so as to know what he was dealing with because firstly I think that Brutus should not have let Antony speak

  2. Show how Shakespeare demonstrates the use of persuasion with close reference to the play ...

    midnight visitations in the orchard might mean, she illustrates her trust and worthiness as a confidante, by showing that she has stabbed herself in the leg but has not complained about it. She uses her wound to try and persuade him to tell her of what is going on in Rome at the present state.

  1. Compare the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

    He has succeeded. However Brutus feels that this is not enough, he needs some security that will keep the crowd to his way of thinking. So his third rhetorical question is again appealing to their sense of patriotism 'Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman?'

  2. IF YOU WERE THE DIRECTOR OF JULIUS CAESAR; HOW WOULD YOU MAKE ...

    to awaken the audience and startle them out of their seat- here the sub-conscience speaks. Brutus recites his lines then the two Plebeians agree to listen to Brutus's speech. At this point only Cassius departs and Brutus goes up to the elevated area to commence his speech.

  1. The exact date of the publication of 'Julius Caesar' is not absolutely certain. However, ...

    Ligarius, like all the other conspirators, has complete trust in Brutus. They trust him to lead them along the right path: "And with a heart new-fir'd I follow you, To do I know not what; but it sufficeth That Brutus leads me on."

  2. You are directing a performance of "Julius Caesar". How would you direct the actors ...

    The way I imagine him to speak it is in a strong clear voice but not with much fire about it. I also think he would be good for this part is because you get the sense that he is very much respected in the way he acts his characters.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work