• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Julius Caesar - How does Shakespeare use the events, themes and language present in act 3 scene 2 to make Mark Antony(TM)s speech so effective?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Julius Caesar" by William Shakespeare Shakespeare Assignment Literature - Joe Hall Explore the techniques used by Brutus and Mark Antony to win over the crowd in Act 3 Scene 2. How does Shakespeare use the events, themes and language present in the scene to make Mark Antony's speech so effective? In 1599, William Shakespeare, a world famous playwright and poet wrote an excellent tragedy based on the conspiracy of the assassination of Julius Caesar. This tragedy is regarded as one of Shakespeare's greatest plays. The play is also roughly based on a true story as Julius Caesar was assassinated because of power. The scene begins with the Plebeian crowd demanding to hear Brutus' funeral speech as they are desperate to hear what he has to say for himself. Brutus' first words are "Friends, Countrymen and Lovers" this is an example of tripling which emphasizes the meaning. He uses this to make a connection with the crowd and it shows that he is stooping down to their level. Brutus becomes very honourable to the crowd by saying "Believe me for mine honour" this makes the plebeian crowd feel flattered and important; Brutus is playing the crowd to sway them towards his side as it is essential for any leader to be loved. ...read more.

Middle

this quote also shows the stupidity of the crowd as Brutus assassinated Caesar because of the leadership. Anthony begins his speech very similar to Brutus' by saying "Friends, Romans, Countrymen" this also mocks Brutus as Anthony believes this was a way to win them over and that he does not mean it. Anthony then clarifies "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him." this explains that he is aiming to keep the peace and not show his emotion. Anthony continues to use irony as he says "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious;" this phrase explains that Anthony thinks Brutus is contradicting himself and he makes the crowd think Brutus' only reason to kill Caesar was his honour. He repeats this several times to emphasize the irony and sarcasm towards Brutus. This technique is repetition, it shows that Anthony has very good persuasive skills. Anthony's emotions start to show when he says "He was my friend, faithful and just to me," this also contradicts what he earlier said about trying not to show his emotion. This shocks the audience as it feels like he couldn't help to show these feelings. ...read more.

Conclusion

Antony then assures the plebeians that he is not trying to aggravate things and that it is his fault, this ensures that the crowd believe he is merciful. The last word in Antony's speech is "mutiny" this word means to overthrow the leader, Anthony uses it as a demand, despite saying he is not trying to cause bother. It shows that Antony secretly wanted the plebeians infuriated after all. To sum up the two speeches, Brutus used tripling, flattering, rhetorical questions and many more. He uses flattery in his speech "Romans Countrymen and Lovers." This makes the crowd feel important and deeply cared for. He also adds rhetorical questions in the text saying "Than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen?" this manipulates the crowd to think that Caesar would have kept the plebeians slaves. Whereas, Antony uses a lot more persuasive techniques like emotive language, verbal irony, anecdotes, rhetorical questions, tripling and repetition. Although Brutus' speech was very successful as it had a variation of techniques, I personally believe Antony's speech was more effective as he delivered it a lot clearer with more skill and technique than Brutus. Antony based his speech on the pity which the crowd still had for Caesar, and he emphasized this to sway the minds of the plebeian crowd. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Antony's use of rhetoric in Act3, Scene2 is more effective than Brutus'.

    4 star(s)

    One other of Brutus' favoured methods is anaphora, which is 'starting several phrases, sentences or lines, with the same word or words.'10 Antony uses pathos extensively, sometimes to the point that people can begin to question his ease in doing so, there appears to be a fine line between extensive

  2. Compare and contrast the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus. Which is the most ...

    The crowd are now desperate for the will and have started to become almost out of control. They say, "They were traitors. Honourable men...the will! The testament... They were villains, murderers. The will, read the will." At this point it seems that Antony thinks that he has the crowd where

  1. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    They are confused at this time and do not know whether to believe Brutus or Antony, "Poor soul, his eyes are red as fire weeping." Here a metaphor is used, as it is a good rhetorical device because it places an image in the minds of the plebeians, that encourages them to think about the.

  2. A Comparative Study of the Two Funeral Speeches from Act II, Scene II of ...

    finally: Yet Brutus was ambitious, and sure he was an honourble man. Page 97, Lines 90-91. Since the people responded positively to Brutus' speech, Antony could not insult Brutus' honesty in a direct manner. Yet, Antony disproves Caesar's ambition with three examples.

  1. Julius Caesar- Mark Antony speech - Analysis

    Here there is a patterning in the speech as he states that 'Brutus says that he was ambitious and Brutus is an honourable man', he then reminds them of the good Caesar did to prove that he was not ambitious, for example refusing the crown and then finally asks them 'was this ambition?'.

  2. Compare the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

    would agree for the positive points and then would consider and eventually agree to the negative. Another technique that Brutus uses is his prop, the dagger that he had killed Julius Caesar with. This would make the crowd feel guilty at the death of their leader, but also it would

  1. Examine all the soliloquies spoken by Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony.

    He will create such chaos and havoc that he could be compared to him. The last line of his soliloquy uses personification to show the extent of hatred and suffering there will be in Rome, "With carrion men, groaning for burial."

  2. Explore the dramatic significance of Julius Caesar Act 3 Scene 2.

    This first line starts in the same way as Brutus's however it is devoted more for the people of Rome not for the fate of Rome as an empire. This speech is the more dominating of the two and in the end wins both the citizens and the audience.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work