• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

King Lear essay.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

King Lear essay Naomi Elliott From the first two acts I feel Shakespeare has been successful in presenting us with characters whom we dislike. I have found that Shakespeare presents them to us in a number of ways. This is first demonstrated to us when Lear is introduced in Act 1. Shakespeare created him to be a very strong charcter who doesn't appear casually in the play. Our dislike towards him forms when Lear creates the love test in which he requires each of his 3 daughters to profess their love to him in public. Shakespeare cleverly turns the audience against King Lear by using the youngest daughter Cordelia to challenge him in public as she refuses to play the game she says, "unhappy that I am, I cannot heave my heart into my mouth" Cordelia's actions bring out a side of Lear that is not shown at the beginning. It becomes clear that the only real point of the game was to boost Lear's ego and therefore I feel the audience cannot help but dislike Lear on the basis of his foolish acts and demands of flattery. ...read more.

Middle

This is first made aware to the audience at the end of the first scene when it becomes clear that the sisters are only worried about themselves, they realise that if their father can banish Cordelia (the most loved daughter) Then he could also turn on Cordelia and Regan, Goneril says, "we must do something, and I' the heat." To demonstrate Goneril and Regans intentions towards their father Shakespeare uses Goneril in Act 1 scene 3. Goneril goes so far as to allow her servent to treat Lear badly, she says, "put on what weary negligence you please" Goneril is fed up with her father and just wants rid of him, without even consulting her father she immediately gets rid of 50 of his followers, this again shows her disloyalty towards her father. Again I feel Shakespeare uses other characters to lure you into disliking the character more. Here he demonstrates this in Act 2 scene 4 when Lear is cleary upset and angry that Goneril has betrayed him, at one point he is reduced to ...read more.

Conclusion

The is demonstrated when Edmund goes so far as to cutting himself in a staged fight in which he pretends to his father that Edgar has attacked him. Its all part of his plan, we also learn that Edmund doesn't believe in astrology but he knows his father does therefore he plays into it-again Edmund is posed to us as a manipulative character. The audience can see how he's manipulating things to go this way and worse more they can see he's succeeding. This in itself would cause you to dislike Edmund greatly but furthermore he makes snide comments such as, "A credulous father, and a brother noble, whose nature is so far from doing harms that he suspects none ;on whose foolish honesty" Edmund is basically saying that Edgar is foolish and that he's easy to trick. This extra sense of frustrated ness towards Edmund that he's getting away with the plot he created is what I feel Shakespeare wants you to feel, he has successfully portrayed him as a true villain to the audience. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE King Lear essays

  1. In what ways does the sub-plot mirror the main plot?

    They are archetype villains from the onset of the play and to some extent all these characters highlight the sibling rivalries. However, whilst Goneril and Reagan run parallel to Edmund in their role of the play, they do differ in their circumstance and reasoning behind their evil actions and therefore to some extent this is where the two plots differ.

  2. Fool's language tricks

    When he sees that he did not manage to entirely soften King's irritation he makes his taunting more restrained and uses another trick.

  1. Character Analyses - King Lear

    Both Lear and Gloucester endure terrible physical and mental suffering as punishment for their misjudgment, but before dying, both men are reunited with the child each earlier rejected. This resolution of the child-parent conflict, which earlier tore apart both families, may be seen as an element of divine justice, although it offers little gratification for the audience.

  2. Do you agree that Shakespeare was a product of his time whose plays have ...

    metaphorical delivery of this message, and see this in the modern context, perhaps to see the men as conceited or arrogant, or foolish and stupid. Schneider argues however that this behaviour was typical of men of power and influence at a time of such low mortality and in a setting

  1. King Lear gold

    What can we extrapolate from that? Early on there was a point at which Ian was waking up and it was a rather sort of gentle awakening, and I said this doesn't seem quite consistent with what appears to be Cordelia's profound apprehension and fear.

  2. Discuss the Theme of Alienation In Two of the

    King Lear himself becomes alienated when he is sent out of his kingdom. He becomes physically alienated from the kingdom which had alienated his daughter from him. He later on goes further down and becomes alienated from his own existence and from his mental capacities when he goes mad as

  1. Explore the Ways in Which Shakespeare Presents the Character of King Lear.

    This presentation will fall in sharp and deliberate contrast with Lear's behaviour later in the play, when he sticks stubbornly to a single, unwise agenda and uses desperate tactics to try to enforce it. Lear uses a grand and powerful vocabulary; he uses words such as 'validity', 'pleasure', 'joy', 'strive'

  2. King Lear - Did he learn?

    In addition, also in Act 5 Scene 3, Lear was calling Kent, Edgar and Albany as "men of stones", totally unaware of what they have done for him; unaware that Kent, even after he was shamefully banished by Lear out of the country, had loyally followed him all along, disguised

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work