Meursault and the Arab: A Detailed Study of Pages 57-60 of The Outsider

Authors Avatar

Adam Blake

D0555006

Meursault and the Arab: A Detailed Study of Pages 57-60 of  The Outsider

Adam Blake

D0555006

World Literature Assignment Two

Word Count 1188

        The last pages of the first part of The Outsider, by Albert Camus, are critical to both the themes and the plot of the book.  This is a pivotal moment within the book; all that has occurred before this point culminates during these few pages, and all that comes after is shaped by this moment.  This point also serves at a division between Meursault’s life as a freeman and his life as a prisoner.  To have any meaningful comprehension of the books plot or themes one must understand this passage.  Depending on one’s interpretation of this passage, we can see Meursault as a victim of circumstance, or as a cold detached killer.  By examining this passage and is relation to the rest of the book one obtains a unique insight into the books meaning.  Also, a careful examination of this passage suggests that Meursault had no intension to kill the Arab.  

        When one examines this particular passage of the play one begins to see the death of the Arab as a tragic accident.  We see from the beginning that Meursault has no real intension of killing the Arab.  He in fact says to Raymond “It’d be unfair to shoot just like that,” (Camus, pg 57) and proceeds to convince Raymond to confront the Arab unarmed.  These do not seem the actions of one who is planning to kill the Arab.  He also does not take the gun from Raymond to shoot the Arab; he takes the gun to prevent Raymond from doing so.  Meursault does suggest that Raymond give him the gun and he may have suggested this simply to further a plan to kill the Arab, but this does not fit with Meursault’s character in the slightest.  He was always known for his brutal honesty.  His motivations for returning to the spring give no indication of premeditation.   Meursault was “a bit surprised” (Camus, pg 58) to see the Arab, which also indicated no premeditation.  The details of the encounter between Meursault and the Arab indicate mutual hostility.  The Arab and Meursault both ready their weapons, Meursault “gripped Raymond’s gun,” (Camus, pg 59) and the Arab “put his hand in his pocket” (Camus pg 59).  This situation escalates and tensions grow when Meursault moves forward and the Arab draws his knife.  It is then at this moment that Meursault is “blinded by this veil of salty tears” (Camus, pg 60).  The phrase, “My whole being went tense and I tightened my grip on the gun.  The trigger gave,” (Camus, pg 60) gives the impression of an unintentional action.  It would seem logical to say I pulled the trigger if the action was intentional.  After examination of the text, it appears that Meursault actions were not planned, and may have in fact been an accident.

Join now!

        The passage also serves to further portray and confirm his existential beliefs.  Meursault throughout the book acts in a self-serving manner unconcerned with the feelings or beliefs of others.  This belief system can be seen quite clearly in the initial chapter when he attends his mother’s funeral.  The passage in question is no exception.  In this passage he is primarily motivated by his physical discomfort.  He does not return to the chalet because he was “unable to face the effort of climbing the wooden staircase and confronting the women again” (Camus, pg 58).  He walks to the beach to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay