Mid-Term Break By Seamus Heaney

Authors Avatar

Mid-Term Break By Seamus Heaney

I have reacently read and studied the poem “Mid Term Break” and this essay I am going to explain in detail how the poet Seamus Heaney uses form, vocabulary and technical devices to help convey his meaning.

        

The title “Mid-Term Break” sounds rather ambiguous, happy and sad all at the same time and has been chosen very well. The title at a first glance seems rather boring and dull but once you have read the whole poem you understand why the poet has chosen these words and why they fit so well in tune with the rest of the poem. I think this is mainly because of the happy and sad meaning involved with the title.

        In the opening stanza Heaney tells us how he, “sat all morning in the college sick bay”. Which suggests a rather boring time but this develops into a more sad and serious time which is a rather large and serious mood change. He also talks about, “bells knelling”, which in itself sums up most of the poem. As well at this he talks about the time and in many peoples minds constantly looking at a clock may be a sign of boredom and impatience.

Join now!

        In the next stanza, stanza two, the mood id that of a very serious nature the writer expresses this by using dashes,

“ in the porch I met my father crying-…”

I think he does this to create a solemn pause and also to show how hard it was for him to come to terms with what had happen in the recent time that he was away. He also talks about “Big Jim Evans” who is the only named character in the poem. I think the writer does this to show that he was a very close friend ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

The Quality of Written Communication is relatively fine. There are a few spelling errors and inconsistencies in punctuation and grammar, but the answer is still comprehendable.

The answer is not very well established as it merely comments on what poetic devices are used by Heaney rather than comment on their effect. The candidate's repeated comments about the overall feel of the poem are extremely limited and offer no insight whatsoever; they merely comment on how effective they think it is - they barely even mention what actually happens in the poem. A small paragraph outlining the poem at the beginning would've countered this, and would've given the candidate a chance to score some context marks as well. The candidate quotes important sections of the poem but rarely ever analyses them to their full effect. For example: "He also talks about, “bells knelling”, which in itself sums up most of the poem." This is a very lazy response. The candidate cannot simply say that that phrase "sums up most of the poem" - what does the use of this aural (audio) imagery ACTUALLY say? Bells knelling are a sound associated with death; the eventuality or the presence of death, and can also be associated with funerals. This candidate failed to acknowledge Heaney was attending the funeral of his younger brother, who was killed by a car accident aged four. This contextual appreciation is imperative for understanding the true sadness of the poem. It is not enough for the candidate to simply comment on what happens in the poem - this will result in nothing higher than a D grade, if that. There must be an effective analysis into how the audience feel when reading the poem and the device the poet uses in order to achieve that response. Later on, when the candidate talks about the imagery of snowdrops and candles being symbolic of innocence and the presence of white conjuring images of purity, the answer strengthens, but there is not enough consistent analysis of this level to grade this much higher than a middle D grade.

This question asks for an analysis of the effect of 'Mid-Term Break' by Seamus Heaney. The candidate very vaguely focuses on what is required, such as the poet's use of imagery and rhythm, but it is not at all fully explored. Quite frequently, this answer slips into a non-analytical writing style with personal response. The Response to the Question is average/poor as there is no real exploration of what Heaney is trying to say. This candidate frequently refers to "the overall feel of the poem" (or words to that effect), but I don't think they once mention what actually happens in the poem - it's almost like they expect the examiner to know what happens, when in fact, the examiner will 'play dumb' and expect a crystal-clear explanation of the poem (very briefly) before beginning, with other explanations further on if required to test whether the candidate is aware of the poem's intentions and how to successfully structure a response.