My fair lady - To what extent do the character, personality and views of Higgins dominates the play and its other characters?

Authors Avatar

PHILIP XIU 11SK

To what extent do the character, personality and views of Higgins dominates the play and its other characters?

       

Like Higgins, Shaw always insisted on the last word, so he wrote a 21-page “sequel” to Pygmalion describing Eliza’s marriage to Freddy and why she couldn’t have married Henry Higgins. Of course the reason is obvious, a consummation would have been a disaster: Higgins is far too old, a confirmed bachelor and far too much of a dominating man. However, Higgins thinks that the fool Freddy isn’t good enough for Eliza; Freddy is a nonentity singularity when you compare the overbearing verbal presence of Higgins. “Overbearing” in the sense that Higgins dominates the play and everyone in it, even though it is not really his story. And also overwhelming, as he uses language as a weapon with which to get his own way, to dominate, and even to batter anyone who disagrees or questions with him, for example he disarms and even entertains the crowd in Act one with his remarks on where the geographical homestead of the people are, even Eliza is bowled over by Higgins’s imitation of her cry (Ah-ah-ah-aw-aw-aw-oo).

Pygmalion’s basic premise is that language is a lever and that, Eliza’s English “will keep her in the gutter to the end of her days.” While Higgins can change Eliza’s life, “ Well…in three months I could pass that girl off as a duchess.” However from the start we realise that the transformation will not be as easy as Higgins has foretold, and the transformation will be a great deal more radical that anything a few elocution lessons on their own might effect. If she does not obey orders, Higgins will make her “sleep in the back kitchen among the black beetles, and be walloped by Mrs Pearce with a broomstick” (Act 2). If she’s found out then she “will be taken by the police to the Tower of London, where (her) head would be cut off as a warning to other presumptuous flower girls.”

Join now!

The play’s physical actions like its verbal time bomb, includes a powerful strain of violence from Higgins, “you take one step in that direction and I will wring your neck” (Act 5). Moreover Higgins orders that Eliza is to be stripped, forcibly scrubbed, and her clothes burnt. Eliza, has no way of turning back, her bridges, like her clothes are burnt on the order of Higgins. Her future is now in Higgins’s hands. At one point in that act, Eliza nearly storms out by Higgins’s heartless insults but is then lured back by Higgins stuffing her mouth with chocolate, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay