• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

On What Basis were the various claims to the throne made in 1066?

Extracts from this document...


On What Basis were the various claims to the throne made in 1066? When Edward the Confessor was crowned in 1042 he was claimed to have become celibate. From that day on there was constant talk, and at some times feuds, over who would step in to replace the man that was the King of England. Even at such an early stage in Edward's reign there was already bids and claims coming from all directions to succeed him. In the race to become King there were on a minor scale four claims to the throne. However the two major claimants were that of William the Duke of Normandy and the prestige Harold Godwinson. The claims to the throne had been narrowed down to five by historians, however at the time just about anyone with a piece of land was placing their bid on ruling the country. The other four whom would have believed had an almost given right to become king were: Harold Hardraader the half brother to Olaf (King of Norway), Edward Atheling son of Edmund Ironside (King of England 1016), Swein Estherithson the closest family descendant of the respected and renowned Cnut (King of England 1016-1035) and last and more than likely most doubtful Tostig the somewhat more popular of the Godwins' family in Edwards eyes certainly. William the Conqueror a young, wise and experienced Duke solely believed that on the day Edward died he would step in and gain full control of England. ...read more.


On his search he stumbled across Harald Hardraader who had just recently ended a long war campaign against Denmark. After losing to Denmark Harald saw this as a great opportunity to earn some real respect on the greatest level and dominate a country of mass importance. With Tostig's vengeful feelings at boiling point they began their claim for the throne. Harald had the potential to become a great King. Not only a strong powerful figure but also very resourceful and could improvise superbly in times of trouble. Someone with great battle field experience which is a lot more than what can be said for claimants such as Edward Atheling, Harald would have been a potential choice to defend the country against the force of the Norman's. Tostig also had experience with the political side of matters, having been an earl of Northumbria for some time and as Walker quotes "Tosti ruled the Earldom successfully for almost ten years." He could easily have handled that area sufficiently. Another factor, which would have contributed to the claim of Tostig and Harald, was that Tostig was a keen favourite of Edward the Confessor who took a close liking to him on the instance they met. Edward who had many problems and held many grudges with the Godwin family looked upon Tostig as a friend and was very sad to see him exiled in the events of the Northern rebellion. ...read more.


In respect of all the claims made to the throne in 1066 it had to be beyond exceptional doubt that the true, most probable and practical claim came from the most powerful man in England, Harold Godwinson. "It was a blend of two main qualities, an apitude for war with a desire for peace" which gave him the credentials to succeed the confessor. Known to many already as the sub-regulus he was destined for greatness. It was inevitable to many that it was only a matter of time until he got his fame and respect which his father fought so hard to gain. William the conqueror also lay good claim to the throne however in many historians' opinions he lacked the decisive vote of the witan and the military might of the earldoms. In the case of Harald Hardraader, Tostig and Swein they were mere outcasts in the real race for kinship. They lacked land, support, close relatives to Edward and respect of the English people. Edward Atheling was a different matter as he may have stood a very good chance of becoming King. Having been personally called over all the way from Hungary to visit Edward and talk of these matters he must have had good reason to do so. Suspicious and unfortunate circumstances however put a sudden halt to his claim and his son was too young to take into consideration. In conclusion there was one claim that stood out above the rest the Verba Novissium had much greater authority than all the claims put together. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

    Barlow4 agrees and his view is also supported by Vita, 'the earl suffered a defeat in pressing his request.' Instead Edward did not accept Godwines request but chose Robert of Jumi�ges instead. This shows that Edward was not a failure as he had control over the earls, whereas in the

  2. What were the reasons behind Harold's visit to Normandy and How was the Visit ...

    in the presence of William the grant of the succession to the English throne which had previously been made by the King to the Duke." (Douglas). Harold doubtlessly had little liking for this task but it was claimed that it would have been unwise to disobey the King's orders and

  1. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    Richard speaks abruptly to his noblemen and army before the battle but effectively is isolated on his own. No one likes him anymore - not even his own men or the audience. He is the king of England but is completely alone.

  2. Why were the crises of 1051 and 1052 significant?

    Edward was trying desperately to put as many of his past Norman friends into the key roles in England. When the Archbishop of Canterbury role became vacant Edward took it upon himself to bring Robert of Jumieges into the Limelight.

  1. How effectively did the Scots respond to Edward I's historical arguments for English superiority ...

    first point becomes the most important, certainly in legal terms, of his claims. He moves from ancient Scottish kings paying homage to English kings to what appears to be a comprehensively long and undeniable list of examples of present or recent Scottish kings paying homage to the English crown.

  2. Was Thornbury castle built as a palace or for defence?

    There was no doubt that Buckingham's first concern was to build him self a splendid hideaway where he could live in luxury. If you were building a castle in case of an attack, then why spend so much money on the castles features?

  1. Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

    Edward forms an alliance with William, meaning that William will not be able to form an alliance with Flanders. Therefore this shows that Edward was a success as he was defending his kingdom from any external enemies. This view of Edward is agreed by other historians such as the Vita, ASC and Ailred.

  2. Why in the period to 1072, was William successful in establishing his authority over ...

    He not only lost papal support but also caused further rifts between the Britons and their Norman ruler. He was widely criticised with Oderic Vitalis saying, '...for this act which condemned the innocent and guilty alike to die by slow starvation I cannot commend him...such brutal slaughter cannot remain unpunished.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work