• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Priestley uses a 'Whodunit' genre to explore social problems. How does he do this in 'An Inspector Calls'?

Extracts from this document...


Priestley uses a 'Whodunit' genre to explore social problems. How does he do this in 'An Inspector Calls'? 'An Inspector Calls' is a "Whodunit" written by J.D. Priestley in 1945 and was first shown in Britain at the new Theatre on the 1st October 1946.Priestley was a socialist and in 'An Inspector Calls', the main theme explores capitalism versus socialism. This play is a morality play. Priestley communicates his message to the audience by representing capitalism by the upper class and the Birling family and socialism by the lower class and the Inspector and Eva Smith/Daisy Renton as this related to real life during this time. Priestley presents his arguments clearly through interesting characters, with very different views and a powerful story line with major consequences to individual actions. He presents this morality play within the "whodunit genre". Priestley uses a whodunit genre to demonstrate his social message for various reasons. The message is directed to the upper class so Priestley needed to make sure they saw it. Going to the theatre was popular with the upper class until 1939 when cinema became extremely popular, so as an attempt to retain a theatre audience Priestley used a detective thriller as these genres were clearly popular at this time as many people enjoyed Agatha Christie and Emlyn plays. They were popular detective thriller play writers. Another reason for using a whodunit genre would be that in the play most of the characters are usually thoroughly questioned by a detective so their actions, thoughts, and opinions can be explored deeply through the question and answer process. Also this would be perfect to demonstrate a social message as actions and consequences of a crime are shown and would make the audience think twice about making the same mistake. A detective thriller conventionally uses a number of elements that Priestley used. The victim in this play was Eva Smith and later on Daisy Renton, who was of the lower class. ...read more.


Then Sheila said she saw Eva smiling at another assistant as if to say "doesn't she look she looked awful". Sheila said to the Inspector "I was absolutely furious". So as a result, Sheila told the manager that if they don't sack Eva she would tell her parents to close their account at Milwards. From this story, Sheila has shown that she can act selfishly, jealously, childishly and use her power selfishly. However once she had realised what she had done she felt extremely guilty, and regrets her mistake. She says on page 24 "I've never done anything like this before and I'll never, never do it again to anyone". So finally the inspector succeeded in changing Sheila's views and making her realise that not caring for others will result in terrible things happening. Priestley uses Sheila an example for the upper class audience to give them hope that anyone can learn from their mistakes and become a better person. When the inspector finished questioning he explained that after Eva had been 'fired' she changed her name to Daisy Renton. As soon as Gerald heard this name he was shocked and Sheila noticed the look on his face and realised he knew her and tried to make him confess to whatever he'd done. At the beginning of act two Inspector Goole starts to question Gerald Croft. Gerald Croft was the son of an extremely important man that owned a very successful business. Through Birling's speech at the beginning of the play, Gerald showed he agreed with Birling's views- he says, "I believe you're right sir". Also during the inspectors questioning of Birling, Gerald was agreeing with Birling, about running business, and keeping labour costs as low as possible. This might suggest that he was a capitalist. At the beginning of the play Sheila asked Gerald where he was all summer and he told her he was busy at work, but she was not convinced, and was still saw his absence as a mystery. ...read more.


One of the most significant things said in the play was on page 56. when the inspector gives his final view of socialism and capitalism. He says " We don't live alone, we are members of one body. We are responsible for each other." Also for his final attempt to argue his case he warns " And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men do not learn that lesson they will be taught it in fire, blood and anguish. Good night." This comment is so powerful, and the reason why Priestley wrote this is to frighten the audience and suggest what will happen if they don't change their capitalist ways. He uses harsh words such as "fire, blood and anguish" to shock the audience as well as frighten them. After he says the line above he leaves the Birling's house and the stage. This is a very effective exit for the socialist as he has just stated his point extremely clearly and there is nothing left to say, so instead of waiting for a response he leaves the Birling's completely speechless and walks off in silence. And the reason for Priestley writing such a drastic exit is so the audience will never forget the inspector. J. D Priestley wrote this play with interesting dialogue, deep, realistic characters, and an effective story line that specifically dealt with the problems of capitalism. Through the thorough questioning of each character he was able to present these problems interestingly, without having to list them down, and so kept the audience entertained while expressing the true theme behind this detective thriller. Also Priestley wrote this play to appear it is about the Birling's mistakes but manages to direct the message at the audience and while watching this play, make them think of their own mistakes and I think that is what Priestleys main aim was. I think that Priestley wrote "An Inspector Calls" to demonstrate the true importance of socialism and the unimportance of capitalism and I think He definitely achieved his purpose. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. In what ways does Priestley explore responsibility in An Inspector Calls?

    good if sometimes we tried to put ourselves in the place of these young women...'. The scope of the play relates to us all. The Inspector's comments are often addressed as much to the audience as to those on stage.

  2. How does Priestley present attitudes to the theme of morality in "An Inspector Calls"?

    with "He could have kept her on" and "Why shouldn't they try for higher wages"l, highlighting that he feels Birling had a choice, a moral choice, and in his opinion, took the wrong one. Eric is also shown to have moral sensitivity alongside Sheila in the closing scenes of the

  1. How does Priestley explore the theme of responsibility in the play, An Inspector Calls?

    Birling refuses to admit to her involvement in Smith's suicide and the Inspector becomes almost aggressive in his attempt to prise the truth from her. As a dramatic devise Priestley uses the Inspector as the role of narrator and unifies the structure of the play.

  2. An Inspector Calls. Explore the social and political views of the Birlings and the ...

    Also, Birling tires to bully and intimidate Inspector Goole by telling him that Chief constable "is an old friend of mine," Then he threatens the inspector by saying, "I've half a mind to report you." Here Birling is using his friendship with the chief constable to threaten the inspector so

  1. What is Priestley's main aim in 'An Inspector Calls'?

    "I didn't ask for anything in return". Society in 1912 was very bad because rich men could treat poor girls how they ever they wanted to. Mrs Birling also treats Eva Smith as an inferior and refuses to assist her when she comes to her charity for help.

  2. Who is responsible for the death of Eva Smith? Pay close attention in your ...

    "we let them all come back- at the old rates- except the four or five ringleaders" "Eva Smith was one of them. She'd had a lot to say- far to much- so she had to go." Birling sacked her two years ago and believes that he has no responsibility for her death.

  1. How Far Does "An Inspector Calls" Fit Into the Genre of Detective Fiction?

    So far in the play these have been the things related to detective fiction: a accusation, a death, a victim/suspect , and the suspect defending himself. The diction related to detective fiction so far is : "died" and "responsibility". The audience at this time do believe that the play is

  2. What message do you think that Priestley is trying to give in 'An Inspector ...

    If he is not a real Inspector, what is he? A clever impostor (but nonetheless human)? The personification of the social conscience the characters all lack or suppress? A supernatural, God-like being (for he certainly seems to know what each character has done, without being told)?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work