• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Proctor's Contribution to the Effectiveness of Arthur Miller's 'The Crucible'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Proctor's Contribution to the Effectiveness of Arthur Miller's 'The Crucible' By Jeffrey Li The name 'John Proctor' resembles a man of utmost character and dominance. From when he first enters the scene of the play, he instantly makes a huge impact on the atmosphere on stage before he even mutters a word. No matter where you are in the Salem, there is no way you can ignore or disregard his presence. John Proctor is the heart of this play and is the key contributor to the striking effectiveness of Arthur Miller's dark and mysterious drama. Due to his extreme authority and command on the stage, Proctor always seems to be at the centre of conflict within the play. Whenever he appears, he is always liable to create a sense of insecurity. He is the source of tensional conflict and because of this, he has a very distinct effect on the characters that surround him. Proctor's attendance is always made incredibly obvious and this alone gives people difficulty feeling comfortable when he is around. One of the best examples of this is expressed when he first enters the play, giving Mary Warren quite a serious fright: "Enter John Proctor. On seeing him, Mary Warren leaps in fright."(p16) As said before, he has not even muttered or said a word. His reputation and personal conveyance is enough to disturb others. "Be you foolish Mary Warren? Be you deaf? I forbid you to leave the house, did I not? Why shall I pay you? I am looking for you more often than my cows!" (p16) "I'll show you a great doin' on your arse one of these days. Now get you home, my wife is waitin' with your work!" (p16) These quotes emphasise that this man's bite is just as bad as his bark. Not only does Proctor have a strong and powerful appearance, his speech also expresses his rash and rough personality. ...read more.

Middle

But it just seems that in these opening stages of the play - Elizabeth is showing no intentions of letting him get away with it and constantly rubs it in: "Proctor: You doubt me yet? Elizabeth: John, if it were not Abigail that you must go to hurt, would you falter now? I think not. Proctor: Now look you - Elizabeth: I see what I see John." (p45) Besides his atmosphere-changing attributes, there is another thing that Proctor contributes to this play and that is the ability to give the crowd an opportunity to interact with the characters on stage. Through Proctor's choric role, the audience are able to communicate their own thoughts and opinions to others in Salem. Due to the distinct resemblance in beliefs, a person watching the crucible would be able to imagine that they are Proctor on stage, acting out the play and taking part in a trial of the 17th century. Equipped with this ability, the audience are inevitably insured to bear a higher level of interest towards what awaits in the mysterious and twisted plot. Since the audience sympathises with Proctor, it adds to the tragic effect of the ending. The emphasis upon it being a 'tragedy' is subtle yet the factors among it are probably strong enough to categorise it as what is known as a 'Shakespearean Style Tragedy'. Even Arthur Miller himself stated that this was in fact his intention when writing this play: "Every tragedy is the story of how the birds come home to roost. You do something, and then you try to undo it and it won't undo; it keeps pursuing you until it catches up to you." This is basically what happens to Proctor in this story. Out of the goodness of his own heart, he attempts to save his wife Elizabeth from the rope. However, he is instead inadvertently dragged into the situation and placed upon the grand podium himself; thus finding himself suspended in a state of affairs which turn out to be both uncertain and inescapable. ...read more.

Conclusion

~ Danforth This is the point where Proctor comes into this, since he is the man who was placed in the play by Arthur Miller in order to protest against all of this injustice. He is the one that Arthur Miller is using as the 'vehicle' for social criticism. Due to the fact that he plays the choric role that the crowd favour, and since Danforth resembles the court/senate that the crowd dislike, it automatically causes the crowd to switch perspective and see what is going on from Miller/ Proctor's point of view. Proctor is almost the character that Arthur Miller puts inside the play as a representation of himself. Although their personalities may be different, Miller and Proctor both share the same thoughts and this itself is another metaphor concerning what the play stands for. As a summary, there are four main things that Proctor contributes to this play: - Conflict: through his dominant personality and iconoclastic figure. - A higher level of involvement concerning the crowd: via his Choric Role. - Tragic Effect: as he adds hope to a lost cause and climbs up to fall back down. - Vehicle of protest against social disorder: by expressing Miller's thoughts. Arthur Miller put his own heart and soul into the character of John Proctor and as a result placed himself and the audience into the play. Thus, he has expressed his opinions to the crowd and given them an underlying habit of thought concerning the social disorder in modern society. Without a character like Proctor in this play, Arthur Miller would have had a harder time creating drama and conflict. It would have been difficult to raise interests and affairs concerning the audience and there would have been no way to reach such a climatic ending. As said before, Proctor is the key contributor to the striking effectiveness of this story and without some to play a role like this, a play is just not the same. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. To what extent can 'The Crucible' be viewed as a Classical Tragedy?

    Postponement now speaks a floundering on my part'. It is certain that 'The Crucible' deals with serious and universal themes. The persecution of innocents in the play can not only be applied to the people who were hung in Salem in the 1600s because they were accused of witchcraft, but

  2. The Crucible - summary.

    Reverend John Hale of Beverly arrives, a man who prides himself on the ability to ascertain witchcraft. Miller interrupts the play for another historical interlude. Miller gives a history of the Church employing accusations of Satanic alliances against enemies, such as Luther and links this to his contemporary ideologies.

  1. 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller - Discuss the appeal of 'The Crucible' to its ...

    And now you bid me tear the light out of my eyes? I will not, I cannot! You loved me, John Proctor, and whatever sin it is, you love me yet! The use of archaic lexis by characters in their dialogue is another manner in which Miller endeavours to create a 17th century environment.

  2. In the Crucible, Arthur Miller shows us how fear and suspicion can destroy a ...

    Suspicion soon engulfs the community and the little privacy that once existed suddenly shatters. Privacy was quickly interpreted to mean that people had some terrible fault to hide and there was an intense pressure for neighbours to reveal each other's sins.

  1. Discuss the role that grudges and rivalries play within The Crucible by Arthur Miller

    This stage direction shows the audience that Abigail Williams has a bad reputation. The use off the word "endless" shows that she will stop at nothing to get hew own way; it also puts the audience at the edge of their seats.

  2. By What means does Miller create a sense of Expectations within his audience in ...

    When Marco sees Eddie inflicting pain upon his younger brother Marco is quick to show That he is there to protect his brother, when his mind is made up he is totally focused, he employs tunnel vision. Marco's intension to punish Eddie was not a selfish one; he feels that it is his duty to do so.

  1. Focusing on Act 3, to what extent is 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller an ...

    Abigail hates Elizabeth. So in conclusion naming names gives the confessor a lot of power and authority. However Giles chooses not to mention the name of his source of information to the courts because he know and is very aware of the action the authorities will take if he mentions the name to the court.

  2. John Proctor is the tragic hero of "The Crucible". Discuss

    Proctor's downfall in the play is initiated by a human flaw, which to a great extent qualifies him to be the tragic hero. The Crucible is the play written by Arthur Miller based upon the events of the 17th centuary; procecution of people before local megistrates to procecute people of witchcraft in Salem in Massachusets.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work