• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reacting against Victorian optimism and to the horrors of the 20th Century, William Golding chose to express his anti-Utopian views about humanity in ‘Lord of the Flies’ (1954). Explore how Golding crafts his narrative in order to voice his phil

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Reacting against Victorian optimism and to the horrors of the 20th Century, William Golding chose to express his anti-Utopian views about humanity in 'Lord of the Flies' (1954). Explore how Golding crafts his narrative in order to voice his philosophical views about 'man's essential illness'. To what extent do you agree with his views? Golding's dystopian views of 'man's essential illness' are derived from his experience of 20th Century warfare. 'Lord of the Flies' is a fable in which Golding displays man's flaws inside a microcosm. This didactical work shows us that we have far to go, but there is hope. I will study his novel to discover his views, and will decide if I concur with them. Golding was born in Cornwall in 1911, and brought up in Wiltshire. His father was a teacher and a socialist and his mother actively supported the campaign for votes for women, so from an early age he was aware of social and political systems and their influence on people. During the Second World War, Golding joined the Royal Navy and took part in the sinking of the Bismarck and the Normandy landings on D-Day. His experience of the war had a profound effect on his view of the world. He learnt how brutal people can be. Although he was appalled by the evils of Nazism and the Third Reich, he said in an interview in 1963 that everyone was capable of inhumanity, not just the German or the Japanese. He saw Nazism as an evil system, and so horrifying that it could not be explained through reason alone. Later on he looked for an explanation in the nature of human beings, in their capacity for brutality and inhumanity. ...read more.

Middle

None of the other boys understand him; he is simply dismissed as 'batty' and 'funny'. His perception of the natural life of the island has a distinct contrast to the other boys. When he retreats to his secret den and is absorbed by richness and variety, he recognises that the real beast is in everyone, and that this truth must be accepted before we are either ruled by it or overcome it. At the end he becomes a martyr, who died for others, he is killed as he tries to tell the boys the truth about the beast. From the beginning Jack is singled out from the rest of the boys because of his flame red hair. This insights a sense of ferocity and violence in the reader's mind, even before his personality is revealed. He contributes to the whole group by providing meat. Jack openly contests Ralph's leadership and is obsessed with power. At the start he controls the 'wearily obedient' choir with military discipline. Jack rebels against hope of rescue due to the amount of pleasure and enjoyment he is having on the island. Jack rejects the democratic processes by which rules and decisions are made, and instead imposes his own desires by force. Jack rules in an autocratic embodiment of power. He enjoys his 'subjects' to be hurt in order for their obedience and loyalty. Ironically if they hadn't have been rescued, Jack's tribe would have lost their main source of food, the fruit trees that were burning, to route out Ralph. 'The fools! The fools! The fire must be almost at the fruit trees-what would they eat tomorrow?' He overcomes and suppresses the civilised restraints which originally prevented him from killing a pig and surrenders himself to his violent and bloodthirsty instincts. ...read more.

Conclusion

His mind is obviously degrading, because he eventually has 'one of his times', a fit, which is a result of great mental stress. Simon is a macrocosm of every person on earth, he is facing the two parts of his inner self, the good and the evil within him are confronting each other externally. Strangely the evil within him is externalised outside of Simon whereas the goodness within him stays inside of him. Golding does this to show us that we all externalise our fears into a tangible object, so that we can defeat it in some way. But if it were displayed inside us then we would have no clear way in which to defeat the evilness within us all. Golding portrays the whole of the human race in these few boys. He reverses mankind's evolutionary state; he removes civilisations restrictions on them so their natural primal state is laid bare. We are shown that are roots were based around murderous savages, which, if left unchecked, we would all eventually become. I think that Golding has shown the disintegration of the boy's personalities to such an extent to achieve the direct opposite of Ballantyne. I believe that Golding completely believes in the 'original sin' that resides in all human beings. Although I think that we all have a part of us that is in tune with evil, most of the world's population has the ability to control this side of our personality, and in most, will only surface in extreme conditions. In effect, I partly believe in Golding's theory because he gives us examples of evil, within Roger and Jack. But I can also see that humans have a natural good side to them, in which Golding has shown in Simon. The author has written a profound novel which does display 'man's essential illness' that we will never escape from. By Cheryl Gogin ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE William Golding section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE William Golding essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How does William Golding show evil at work in Lord of the Flies?

    3 star(s)

    of evil within the novel this is because it makes people scared and live in fear, but I also believe that it is a metaphor for what lies within of the children; an evil beast. Not only this but I also believe that the beast helps us to identify the

  2. Free essay

    Why Do You Think William Golding Chose To Set Lord of the Flies on ...

    4 star(s)

    surrounding it to show how good people interact with nature, and how good people do appreciate how good the world is, and should not be destroyed by nuclear war. By setting LORD OF THE FLIES on an island away from all modern materialistic values and influences, Golding was able to show how nature rewards those who are good, i.e.

  1. To what extent is Lord of the flies a pessimistic book?

    He would've been killed if it had not been for the captain. This makes the book very pessimistic, as all the people we like most when we read the book end up either dead or damaged. I think this may be one of the ways Golding shows us that only

  2. Themes, Motifs, and Symbols - Themes are the fundamental concepts addressed and explored in ...

    On the beach, Ralph and Piggy see that a ship has appeared on the horizon; they also see that the signal fire has gone out. They hurry to the top of the hill, but it is too late to rekindle the flame, and the ship does not come for them.

  1. Compare the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding to Heart of Darkness ...

    Roger is the most evil boy on the island and his large capacity for evil is seen in how he actually kills Piggy by shoving a giant boulder off a cliff. The manager Golding and Conrad use the characters and their behavior to reinforce these four major themes further and

  2. Discuss the Leadership Qualities of Piggy, Ralph and Jack As Presented In the Opening ...

    By reading the first couple of chapters, I found out that Ralph is basically the popular one of the group. 'Ralph counted. "I'm chief then."' He had the most hands up out of the group when they were electing chief.

  1. Is Golding's view of humanity entirely pessimistic?

    This indicates that their new lives will be ones of war, terror and destruction and therefore lives no different from the ones they followed whilst being on the island.

  2. Analysis of Lord of the Flies.

    In a religious reading, for instance, the beast can represent the devil; in a Freudian reading, it can represent the id, or the amoral desires of the mind. But however one interprets the notion, it is quite clear that the littlun's idea of the monster rising from the sea terrifies

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work