• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Romeo and Juliet - Tybalt is the catalyst responsible for the tragic consequences in Romeo and Juliet.

Extracts from this document...


Romeo and Juliet Tybalt is the catalyst responsible for the tragic Consequences in Romeo and Juliet. Romeo and Juliet is a play written by William Shakespeare showing how the love between two people, can cause such tragedy. Romeo belonging to the House of Montague's, and Juliet part of the House of Capulet, has little chance from the beginning. The two houses live an ongoing feud, with both having equal hatred for one another. However Shakespeare never talks of how long this feud has been going on for, neither does it say why there is such hate. This hatred is no longer just between the two Lords of the houses, but it spreads throughout all family members. It is these family members, which keep the feud very much alive. On many occasions there have been violent attacks between the families. " ' Three civil brawls, bred of an airy word, by thee old Capulet, and Montague, have trice disturbed the quiet streets of our streets..."' These words spoken from the Prince of Verona, when he stops yet another street brawl. ...read more.


Mercutio is not related to either family, and is simply caught in the middle. This triggers Romeo's actions, as he is so distraught at his best friends unnecessary death, his pain turns into anger and Romeo goes in search of Tybalt. Romeo is confused and upset when he finds Tybalt; he kills him without thinking of the consequences. Had Tybalt not have gone looking to fight with Romeo, Romeo would have kept the peace for the sake of Juliet if nothing else. Due to these actions, Romeo and Juliet's life goes into a downward spiral. As the Prince of Verona states earlier on in the play, if any more trouble was caused on his streets by either of the families, the penalty would be death. However, Romeo narrowly escapes this penalty, and instead is punished with banishment. This is down to the fact that Prince knew that usually Romeo is never violent, Benvolio also helped Romeo escape death by explaining the events of that night, ' " Tybalt, here slain, whom Romeo's hand did slay."' When Juliet discovers that her newly wed, has been banished, she is distraught. ...read more.


All three plays studied have the same plot. However Baz Luhrmanns version is based more on today's times, where Juliet, and Romeo and Tybalt both use guns instead of swords. In conclusion I agree that Tybalt was the catalyst for the tragic consequences, although other people had a part to play in the deaths, such as Lord Capulet for forcing Juliet to marry Paris, and Friar Lawrence for supplying the potion to Juliet and not to forget the on going feud itself. However most of these events would not have taken place if it were not for Tybalt's constant urge to kill Romeo. If the death of Tybalt had not have taken place, Lord Montague and Lord Capulet may have acted the way Friar Lawrence had seen it, by discovering the marriage of Romeo and Juliet they may have called a truce and have resolved the feud. Tybalt, a fiery character, unintentionally killed his beloved cousin Juliet, Lady Monatague, who committed suicide as she learned of her son's death. Finally Romeo, who unfortunately Tybalt did intend his death. If Tybalts rage had not got out of hand these tragic consequences would not have taken place, and Romeo and Juliet may have lived a very happy marriage together. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    In today's society, youth are constantly advocating the change from total dependence on family, to their own independence. Young people often think they know better than their parents, often believing that instead of helping them, they are only punishing them.

  2. Analysis of Baz Luhrmann's romeo and juliet

    This signifies that he is a bad character and what ever words he says has to touch his brace and is therefore evil and bad, which shows that he is an evil and bad character. Baz Luhrmann uses the freeze frame technique very effectively.

  1. Baz Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet.

    made it possible for Baz Luhrmann to include Shakespeare's language. Making the characters recognisable to ones you would see in the modern world today was how Baz Luhrmann reached out to his audience's understanding. By giving characters a new, modern edge to the one Shakespeare gave them but still keeping

  2. How responsible are Romeo and Juliet for their own tragic death? What other factors ...

    She allowed her heart to rule her head. She is obviously not stupid, but she went against her sense. She chose what to do by herself, so this makes her responsible for what has happened. Secondly, there are many other characters that are connected with this tragedy. One of them is Friar Lawrence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work