Shakespeare enables the directors to make a choice of presenting Shylock as a victim or a villain.

Authors Avatar

How does Shakespeare enable the director to

Make a choice of presenting Shylock as

 A victim or a villain?

        Shakespeare enables the directors to make a choice of presenting Shylock as a victim or a villain.

        Prior to the trial scene in the Merchant of Venice, Bassanio had asked this friend Antonio (the merchant of Venice) for three thousand ducats so that he could marry a wealthy woman called Portia.  Antonio was more than happy to lend money to his friend however he did not have any as all five of his trading ships were out at sea.  In order to get money Antonio decides to borrow money of Shylock.

        Shylock is a Jew, who makes a living by lending his money and charging interest for it. In the time of this book being written (1600) there had been a long history of hatred and persecution of Jewish people dating back to the crucifixion of Christ.  As the majority of people were Christians the Jews were segregated, they could only do certain types of jobs. Shylock like many Jews was humiliated and kicked on the streets by Christians. He was sworn at and he was spit on by Antonio who also swore at the Jewish religion. Shylock agreed to lend Antonio the money but on the condition that if he wasn’t able to return within three months, he was able to cut off a pound of flesh from Antonio.  However Antonio was not able to return the money as his ships were lost at sea therefore to save Antonio’s life a trial was held.

Join now!

        If I was directing this play I would portray Shylock as a victim because I think that Shylock is the victim in the play and not Antonio. I think that Antonio deserves his revenge against Antonio as Antonio humiliated in front of everyone even though Shylock had done nothing to him. I also think that Shylock was trying to reform the way Jewish people were treated by Christians. He wanted to other Jews to stand up against the Christians and I think that the contract was the only way to do s without breaking the Christian law.

        I would direct ...

This is a preview of the whole essay