Shakespeare - still relevant today

Authors Avatar

What relevance do these sonnets have for Australians reading them today four centuries after they were written?

Even though Shakespeare’s sonnets were written over four-hundred years ago, they are still relevant today because all of the ideas and issues that Shakespeare addresses in his sonnets are still relevant to people today. Shakespeare had a very good understanding of the many subtle characteristics human nature and emotions. His sonnets have stood the test of time and have remained popular because the issues they raise and the ideas they state, are about humans and human nature, which are both unchanging over time.

Some of the ideas that the sonnets convey include the fear of death, the love for others and our understanding of time and mutability. Humans have these same emotions and experiences today. People still feel jealousy, love, hatred, etc the same as they did in Shakespeare’s time. This is why they are still relevant to Australians reading them today, and it is why so many people can relate to the messages of the sonnets.

Join now!

For example, Shakespeare uses metaphorical comparison to show the guiding, stable and everlasting nature of love. This is evident in Sonnet 116, where Shakespeare talks of love: “It is the star to every wandering bark”. Shakespeare is suggesting that Love is like a guiding star in the sky, because a “bark” is a ship. In Shakespeare’s time stars were used for navigation at sea, known as celestial navigation. Shakespeare is saying that love is like a star to a wandering bark that is fixed in the sky. It can be relied upon for guidance, It lasts forever, and it ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

This is a very vague essay that never really looks at Shakespeare's use of language, structure and form in any real depth. If the title had chosen one or two sonnets to look at and then focused analysis around those while at the same time considering a modern day relevance, a better response could have been constructed. 3 Stars