• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should animals have rights?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

English coursework: Should Animals Have Rights? Good morning fellow ladies and gentlemen, as part of our gathering here today, we will be talking about animal rights, why they should have rights and why animal testing should be banned. As humans we cannot take the pain of being injected with dangerous chemicals or being blinded as part of a lab test. It's painful and cruel leaving a question mark on why we do it to animals. Today, I as '...' , the main speaker for the Animal Rights Organization, also known as the ARO, will talk about why there should be a stop to this. Imagine every 3 seconds I talk an animal is to die; well clearly that is what is happening. What's more is that these 3 seconds an animal is to die it is to happen in a lab. ...read more.

Middle

We do experiments which fail miserably for obvious reasons such as the experiment where we use the rabbit because of its eye, even though its structure is completely different to the human being. We do the experiment because IF it is successful it may work on the human eye. Having said that the rabbit's eye is totally different to ours yet we still test on them. This is known as brutally killing for money, which by far isn't right, whether you believe in god or not. An example I could give you for what goes on in these labs could be one of many, however one of them is the toxicity tests, where we clearly use and destroy or damage hundreds of rats and mice permanently to see the result of something that may happen or not. ...read more.

Conclusion

From this we can understand that animal testing is cruel and wrong not to mention the results being no use to us. We also know that rules have been made to prevent such things, however it is still continued and yes programmers such as PETA have been launched yet it still allows animal testing. The pain we feel of being injected harmful substances is not right, leaving the same rule for animals. The chances of us failing the tests in these labs are worse than a coin toss and we should take this into perspective. Hopefully, many of us listening to this speech have understood what i said and look to do something about this. The remaining who obviously think animal test should continue have clearly not looked at statistics (how we fail) and how cruel it is at the same time. Hopefully I have sent a clear message. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The response follows typical conventions of a speech, such as the “good morning” greeting and the closing conclusion. This is important as it instantly makes the marker aware of the spoken context of the text, allowing marks to be allocated ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The response follows typical conventions of a speech, such as the “good morning” greeting and the closing conclusion. This is important as it instantly makes the marker aware of the spoken context of the text, allowing marks to be allocated accordingly. However, the title of this coursework is “should animals have rights”, yet the candidate only discusses lab-testing. This is therefore indicative of an essay which has reasonable depth but sub-standard breadth. For example, the issue of deforestation could have been included under the guise of an animal’s right to keep its own habitat. A more appropriate title for this response would be something to the effect of ‘lab testing – right or wrong?’

Level of analysis

The candidate uses a number of examples and statistics, such as “every three seconds an animal is to die” and “a new programme such as PETA”. These are effective as they create a more professional tone for the speech and they are also useful in persuading the audience of given points (Argue, Persuade, Advise). However, these examples could have been explored in greater detail. The candidate does not even explain what PETA stands for, thus reducing the effectiveness of these examples as, for all we know, PETA could be a group which has little significance with regards to animal testing. Technical terms such as this should always be explained for the benefit of non-specialist audiences. Were the audience a group of expert scientists, such explanations would be unnecessary.
Unfortunately, the content lacks organisation – each paragraph is barely distinguishable from the next. Paragraphs should be used to introduce new points within an essay and these points should be summarised in the introduction. For example, “in this essay I will explore government legislation relating to lab-testing, ethical implications and financial factors”. Then go on to present these three different issues in three different paragraphs, allowing the reader to better decipher points being made.

Quality of writing

Poor expression renders parts of this speech as being unintelligible. An example from paragraph three being…
“our understanding of… diseases has been dangerously misled… decaying progress of medicine due to testing them on animals” which is a concept difficult to understand. To remedy this, work to a Point Evidence Explain structure. We could alter the point to…
“Animal testing has impeded upon the advancement of medicine, as in the famous example of the London morphine disaster (this is fictitious) in which hundreds of people died. This is significant as results gained from animal experiments led directly to the deaths of many individuals.”
This response is an example of how spell-check cannot be used as a substitute for proof-reading. For example, although “a new programmed known as PETA” has correct spelling, there is clearly a misuse of past-tense verb. In addition to this, numbers such as “3 seconds” are used extensively however it would be better to use figures when referring to numbers – stating “three seconds” renders the response as being far more sophisticated. The conclusion is disappointing; statements such as “hopefully, many of us… have understood what I said” is extremely patronising. This should be changed to “hopefully, many of us… have understood the importance of my given points” which does not suggest that the audience is unable to understand plain English. Furthermore, mild repetition, such as “hopefully” (x2) in the conclusion and “miserably” (x2) in paragraphs four and five hinder the fluency of the response, as the reader asserts that the candidate is not able to deploy a wide range of vocabulary. Replacing one the above with “it is my intention that” and “comprehensively” would show a greater command of English.
Despite this, there are a few examples of linguistic devices used effectively, as in the capitalised “IF” to reinforce the element of probability and the imperative “imagine every [three] seconds” in paragraph two which shows a good control of the audience. Furthermore, contrasting emotive language can be observed in paragraph six with “cruelly punishing these innocent animals”. This is particularly effective as it accentuates the oppressor/ oppressed combination within the response. The candidate clearly has potential to produce coursework to a very high standard. Yet this particular example requires extensive re-writing to achieve this.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by parataxis 28/02/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Notes for a speech on tattoos.

    4 star(s)

    Dermis cells are very stable, so the tattoo is practically permanent Transition: Now that we know what a tattoo is lets look at the history of tattoos.

  2. Fireworks should not be banned

    If firearms are legal, why shouldn't fireworks be legal as well? Fireworks cause far fewer deaths per year than firearms. On average, 500 deaths per year in the Country are firearm related, whereas fireworks only cause 250 injures and few deaths.

  1. Martin Luther King - Essay on his speech "I have a dream"

    Explain effect here. King also repeats 'I have a dream' this is when King is preaching to his audience, it emphasizes main goals and shows to the audience that he is not making the speech for the them but for himself as well again creating a bond.

  2. Malcolm X's "Message of the grassroots" speech -lanugauge analysis

    ,most of their education came from the bible .For that reason short ,easily understandable sentences are used ,without complicated jargon ,so the message is clear to the audience.

  1. Terrorism Speech

    Exactly how a controlled demolition is carried out. Also the towers fell at freefall pace, which is impossible if the floors weren't blown out from underneath them. They blow out the central colmns and the building then falls with a slight dip in the middle. Building seven had this exact rimp.

  2. Global Warming Speech

    The future is not somewhere we are going. It is something we are creating. Every day we do things that make some futures more probable and others less likely. Reducing your carbon and greenhouse gas emissions will not only make your lifestyle more sustainable, but also save you money.

  1. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind

    government, the amount of crimes has not declined since the death penalty has been in use. In short, death by execution is deplorable. Although I assume that you might have become exhausted listening all these things about ? An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.? I wish

  2. Capital Punishment Speech

    How can anyone improve and learn with capital punishment. Murdering a human being is a big mistake but we all can learn from our mistakes. Capital punishment doesn't allow this. It tells us to never make a mistake. You show me the man who never made a mistake and I shall show you the man who never improved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work