• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Fox hunting be banned?

Extracts from this document...


Christina Fayers SCM Should Fox hunting be banned? Fox hunting dates from the late 17th century, when it arose as a practical method of limiting the fox population which endangered poultry farming, but by the early 19th century it was indulged in as a sport by the British aristocracy and gentry who made it traditional. Foxhunting was introduced into the USA by early settlers from England and continues in the southern and middle Atlantic regions. The recognized fox hunting season runs from the first Monday in November until the following April. Fox hunting is the pursuit of a fox across country on horseback, aided by a pack of foxhounds specially trained to track the fox's scent. The aim is to catch and kill the fox. Fox hunting has met with increasing opposition. Although fox hunting is by no means the only issue annoying people from the countryside, it is one of the bigger issues. Fox hunting with hounds is a tradition in the English and Scottish countryside, which has been going for centuries. That's why countrymen and women were up in arms the minute they caught a sniff of the government's intention to debate a possible banning of the sport. Animal- rights activists condemn it as involving excessive cruelty, and in Britain groups of hunt saboteurs disrupt it. Animal rights activists have had just about enough of the activity they call 'blood sport' and are horrified that it is still going on in our countryside in this day and age. ...read more.


It is not just foxes and other wildlife that suffer. Horses and dogs are also victims of hunting, viewed simply as 'sporting accessories' many sustain fatal injuries during the gruelling chase and the poor foxes are often savagely ripped apart by the hounds. Animal welfare arguments * From the RSPCA website: A 12-year-old girl and her ten-year-old brother were traumatized when they saw a fox being torn apart by a pack of hounds in their garden in West Yorkshire. Their father said: 'They (the hunt) said it would have died in seconds, as the hounds would have got it by the throat, but from what I saw it was torn to pieces.' * Fox hunters chase foxes for pleasure and not because they want to help farmers. Foxes could be controlled by shooting instead. * Foxes do attack chickens and lambs, but that is part of their nature. Farmers should protect their animals, not attack the foxes. Civil liberties arguments * Personal freedom doesn't mean you have a 'right' to be cruel. * Living in a democracy means that you have to accept the majority view - we can't all just do what we want. Economic arguments * Only 835 people are employed in hunt kennels. That many jobs are often lost when a factory closes. The economy is strong enough to bounce back. ...read more.


I now try to look at the sport from both sides. I would say that I do not agree with the sport because that's exactly what it is, a sport, a hobby. I feel that hunters find it more of a social gathering than an attempt to control the fox population. There are a great proportion of people who participate in fox hunting because of the prestige. These are the people who the ban needs to be aimed at. If you want a feeling of exhilaration, take your horse to a beach and go galloping along in the wind. I am not so narrow minded that I cannot see a need for foxes to be controlled but I don't necessarily agree with letting the fox reach the point of physical exhaustion so he can no longer run, that's not natural. Also once the fox has reached its den, game over, he's the winner, the dogs shouldn't be digging it up. No one has the right to inflict unnecessary suffering on animals. Moreover, hunting is not a natural encounter between predator and quarry because, unlike animals, humans are responsible for their actions. This is one debate where there is always going to be conflict and not everyone is going to be satisfied once a 'solution' is decided upon. Fox hunting is a subject that needs much consideration. I believe that soon the government will open their eyes and see that fox hunting is an ancient and barbaric ritual. How can killing of any kind be described as sport? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Fox Hunting

    Even if most farmers want foxes controlled, is foxhunting the answer? Is it as effective as the foxhunters believe? The Countryside Alliance believe that, yes, foxhunting is an effective method of control but concede "it is not the be all and end all" of fox control.

  2. Should animal testing be banned?

    I believe that no one can say science is morally justifiable, especially if it is being used to create a weapon which one day, may harm that very person. Yet another argument people make to justify vivisection is that every major medical breakthrough in the past century is because of animal testing.

  1. Should conscription be banned?

    Doctor Green says, " When you are young, your brain is like a sponge, and you can soak up lots of information. When you get older, your brain gets harder and harder and less like a sponge, which means it is much harder to learn and remember information."

  2. Should Abortion be banned?

    Other religions have a wide variety of views on the topic, but it varies with the individuals' opinion. The Church of England for example, says that they "combine strong opposition to abortion with recognition that there can be strictly limited conditions under which it may be morally preferable to any available alternative."

  1. invasion of iraq in 2003

    However, the language used is straightforward and well explanatory especially the way the story starts tame, gets serious, then lighten up in the end. Also the style of the story is humorous with a good description of how Mrs Maloney giggles at the end and at the same time enjoys the whole scenario by getting away with the murder.

  2. The Lords of Dicipline and The Crucible

    his best to defend his wife and put an end to it. His virtuous nature shines through here. He knows it is unjust to just accuse someone of witchcraft without any significant proof. The entire Salem society believes witchcraft to be true.

  1. Original Writing Coursework Fox Hunting,

    However the hunters have not just lay over and had their hunts disrupted. As you can see from both photos on left and just below (one with a man wearing a balaclava the photo on the left. The behaviour of these hunters can be described as both criminal and thuggish

  2. Compare and contrast the treatments of dogs in To Flush, My Dog by Elizabeth ...

    They have a very bad relationship. Although there was food and shelter for Trio, there was no trust between them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work