Should mercy killing be legalised?

Authors Avatar

Vivien Tan 1034

Should Mercy Killing be legalized?

        Mercy killing otherwise known, as euthanasia has been a central issue subjected to heated debate. As a concept easy to understand, it is the act of killing someone painlessly. Proponents of mercy killing have questioned the quality of life experienced by the patients as well as the financial and emotional burden upon the family. Detractors have discredited the acceptance of euthanasia arguing along the prospects if miracle recoveries that could occur if one were kept alive. It is difficult to reconcile these two seemingly contrasting perspectives or to measure them on a similar scale.

        The underlying rationale for mercy killing lies in the quality of the patient’s life. The value of human existence is to be able to enjoy life, and the enjoyment of life can only be experienced in a state of a conscious being. Hence, unconscious patients living off life support systems are unable to truly enjoy life. The definition of life should not merely constitute biological existence but also the conscious existence that actually brings purpose and meaning to their life. A patient who is deemed unrecoverable in a vegetative state should not be artificially kept alive.

Join now!

        Moreover, the result of a patient dependent on life support machines extends to the family. The emotional turmoil to watch your loved one lie unconscious in a ward leaves one lost and helpless. The financial cost of long term use of life support system are costly and may not be affordable to the majority. It would be unfair to put loved ones through the prolonged suffering of watching the patient kept alive on life support system, as well as the heavy financial burden of supporting a patient.    

        Although these claims are indeed true, detractors perceive the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay