• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should parents spend their money on designer clothes for their children?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should parents spend their money on designer clothes for their children? For years now, parents have been spending a fortune on designer clothing for their children, but what is the point? Why are children so obsessed with designer clothes? I am going to write about how designer clothes are a waste of money. Also how they put so much pressure on children at such a young age. There are many reasons why designer clothes are a bad idea. Statistics show that the average ten year old knows of over 400 brands. As well as the fact that in this country alone over �30 billion is spent on designer clothing every year. ...read more.

Middle

Children grow so quickly out of clothes. Why spend so much money on designer clothing when it is only going to last them approximately 5 months at the most. Giving them what they want, when they want it means they will think they are in control. Designer clothes lead to pester power. Previous generations would have been happy with second hand clothes and toys or hand made goods but children now need to have the latest style of clothing or mobile phones and MP3 players. But why? Advertisers only need to get the idea of expensive items into the head of one child because they know this idea will spread like a disease. ...read more.

Conclusion

Designer clothes limit individuality. You are paying to make your child like everyone else not who they really are! A lot of children are put on pressure to conform. Instead of learning at school, their heads are filled with horrid ideas of being bullied because they cannot afford designer clothes. Your children are doing this to them! Wouldn't the world be a much better place if there was not designer clothing? Designer clothes need to be taken of the shelves and out of your children's wardrobes. Make them start to take no for an answer instead for a change! By doing this, you will help your child grow as a person. They will thank you in the end for not helping them become self-centred and greedy. Eliminate the disease!... ...Just say no! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

This answer is very optimistic about the strength of it's own argument; so much so in fact, that it forgets to make a plausible one. As a Response to the Question this is a very good essay, and has provided ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This answer is very optimistic about the strength of it's own argument; so much so in fact, that it forgets to make a plausible one. As a Response to the Question this is a very good essay, and has provided a systematic argument against the promotion of branded clothing. Where it falls down is that it hasn't regarded their opposition's opinions and often, their own points are fully explored.

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis here provides a well-structured argument, but it feels too often like there are so many points the candidate wishes to write down that they have skimped and saved in fully fattening out their ideas properly, resulting in quantity over quality. Nonetheless, there are marks for content, and many ideas are proposed as to why branded clothing should not be encouraged on children as young as ten, but this argument appears very badly evidenced. In Writing to Argue, made-up facts are allowed so long as they appear plausible - they are effectively showing the candidate has the incentive to carry out external research in order to answer a question. To suggest that "the average ten year old knows of over 400 brands" is a little ridiculous, and to then say that £30bn is spent on designer clothes per year seems a suspiciously round figure. Glitches like these wear holes in the argument, weighing down what is in fact good about it (mentioning peer pressure and conformity, the outrageous prices, etc.).
However, sometimes the candidate goes all out and their answer simply becomes accusatory: "Parents think that their child is so unique and special. Designer clothes limit individuality. You are paying to make your child like everyone else not who they really are!". The use of second-person address does well to involve the reader, but to pile the blame onto the parent and offer no possible alternative other than to "Eliminate the disease" or provide any counter-argument suggests that this candidate is not entirely familiar with how to construct a balanced argument. When asks to argue a point, all GCSE candidates MUST provide balance, considering the views of another group of people. In this case, it would be the views of Clothing Designers or the parents who buy the clothes for their children, or even the children themselves - that way there is evidence that not everything written is based on the assumptions and opinions of one person (the candidate). Arguments must have sufficient factual sources.
Another irk here is the use of images at the end of the essay. These would have to substituted - very easily and to no extra effort - into the text so, for example, "There are many reasons why designer clothes are a bad idea" instead becomes "There are many reasons why designer clothes like K-Swiss, fcuk, Nike, and Addidas are a bad idea". However, some of the images are completely irrelevant to the argument, and give the impression that the candidate hasn't quite adhered to the question correctly. Brands like Dior, Gucci and Prada are seldom known for their children's clothes lines and so are not as good an example as perhaps Jack Wills, SuperDry and SC&CO would be. Accuracy is very important in an argument - all candidates should note this - you need to at least give the impression you know what you're talking about by sourcing relevant information.

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication (QWC) of bordering on average/below average. There are instance where questions are not punctuated with the correct question mark and frequent grammatical errors confusing "you're" and "your". Many spelling mistakes that could easily be corrected with a spelling and grammar checker are made as well. Proof reading is important when in an exam. Successful candidates will be wise to leave 5 minutes towards the end of the exam to check over their QWC.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 20/02/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. English Descriptive Writing

    not true, their just wasting their damn money on something that wouldn't go away. It wasn't right. I tried everyway to persuade them to stop this therapy, but they wouldn't budge. School wasn't ever my child fantasy. Jackie is a mirror freaky.

  2. Should the voting age be lowered to sixteen?

    The opinions of sixteen-year-olds are very important, even if some adults may not think so; they should be allowed to represent the younger people of the UK. After all, they are the politicians of tomorrow and if they aren't involved now, they may never be interested in expressing their opinions.

  1. How does Romeo character change during the pLAY Romeo and Juliet?

    Romeo shows restraint when Tybalt challenges him, which is a big deal, since Romeo damages his reputation when he refuses to fight. But Romeo is just as emotional at the end as at the beginning; "This day's black fate on more days doth depend; this but begins the woe, others must end".

  2. Importance Of Money. The first advantage of having money is that stuff costs ...

    This usefulness of money for influencing people is at the heart of the idea that money is power. It's not really the people who tell other to do things all the time with the threat of coercion, it's corporations and businesses who get people to do their jobs every day with the offer of recompense.

  1. Analysis of a charity leaflet for Water Aid

    This Water Aid leaflet states medical information such as "ailments like diarrhoea can be a killer" this shows the effects and seriousness of drinking dirty water, so then they can explain, how by providing them clean safe water, it can improve their health and quality of life, by showing the worst side of the issue.

  2. The Right to Die should be considered Right

    Since there was no chance for her recovery, Mr.Adkins requested that the medical staff withhold the treatment .However, his pleas were ignored.Soon after she died, and Mr.Adkins was billed $250000 for his wife's medical care. The courts ordered to pay the bill which had actually placed him in a terrible financial burden on him.

  1. Slumdog Millionaire: Raising awareness or poverty porn? Danny Boyles film is Gathering awards, but ...

    The subjective treatment of the camera casts the audience as a character and makes us feel part of the action, and along with the empathy created previously for Jamal and the other children of the slums, encourages you to connect with the children and their situation.

  2. "I have a dream". In what ways does this extract/s show that Martin Luther ...

    The word former gives the clear message that the slave trade had come to an end and is in the passed. When King mentions ?the table of brotherhood? he uses this as a metaphor for white and black people being at the same level but also literally, sitting and eating at the same table.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work