• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should smoking be banned in public places?

Extracts from this document...


Should smoking be banned in public places? Catriona Wynne Imagine the scene; you've just come back from a great night out with your friends. Down to the local Chinese restaurant, then onto the happening pubs and clubs for some fun. You walk into your house and smell smoke. You didn't leave a hob on, you didn't leave on your hair straighteners, no, it's you. Your clothes, your hair, all of you smelling of smoke as a result of all the people smoking in the places you have been. Is it time to put an end to smoking in public places? Smoking in public places is an issue which has been being discussed. In whether it should be banned or not, for the past 5 years since the government proposed the ;Smoking kills' white paper in 1998. I can see why smoking in public places should be banned and agree with this proposal. People who are not smokers and have chosen not to smoke are going out in public, and re having their basic right of choosing not to inhale smoke taken away from them. They are having to breathe other peoples smoke- causing passive smoking. ...read more.


On the contrary, it can be said that in most restaurants and cafes the choice now exists to sit in a non-smoking area where people who do not smoke can sit without worrying that smokers are nearby. Smokers have the same rights and responsibilities as a non-smoker and occasional smokers and having the choice of where to sit in restaurants and cafes, give people an option and lets them make up their own mind. A complete ban would take away people's right to decide things for themselves and it would basically be telling the public what to do. Let me give you an example of how non-smokers work, lets take smokers who work in an office block. They are designated a 'smoking room' for when they need a cigarette. Non-smokers would then complain that when the door to the smoking room is opened, there is smoke coming into the no-smoking area. The management would then close the smoking room and the smokers would be forced to light up outside the building. Non-smokers would then complain that smokers are taking too long on their smoking breaks and that it makes the outside of the building look dirty and untidy. ...read more.


Most would probably prefer to stay at home with a take-away and smoke in peace. If they go out with family and friends for a meal, they would have to go outside for a smoke, which wouldn't really make an enjoyable evenings experience. Fewer smokers would go out as they couldn't smoke wherever they go and they wouldn't really enjoy themselves as they would probably be craving for a cigarette for most of the night. About twelve million adults in Britain smoke, therefore, these people would not go out nearly as often, hence, reducing business profit and maybe even some going bust due to so much decrease in incoming money. Take heed as to the information provided in this essay and take into account both the positive and negative arguments. Without question, I agree with this proposition as it would give a better standard of living for everyone concerned, which is the entire public and also increase the overall happiness and health of many people, smokers and non-smokers. Also, take note of this quote, 'Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool- it spreads. Would you swim there?'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Smoking should be banned in all public places

    In 1995, about 18 million children under 10 years of age lived in areas with air quality that did not meet federal standards. Just think about all these innocent people that these smokers are hurting.

  2. a case study on smoking and it's effects

    hinders them doing activities where breathing is important like swimming, dancing or singing. Cilia are small hair like structures that move backward and forward to sweep small particles out of persons lungs. Smoking paralyzes the cilia that line a person's lung so dust pollen and other things that are inhaled sits in the lungs and builds up.

  1. Because of the effects smoking has on you and others should it be banned ...

    that has settled in the bronchial tubes, by producing extra mucus to clean the lungs.

  2. Should smoking be banned in public places?

    On the other hand smokers can easily argue that people that don't want to smell like smoke should stay away from them which, to me, is a fair point. Another idea is that some smokers may only be 'social' smokers and smoke only whilst others are present or only because other people they are friends with smoke.

  1. Topic: Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places?

    In family restaurants there very well might be designated smoking areas but it doesn't take much for that hovering cloud of air to pass by you and your family. Smokers have the right to smoke where they want, when they want.

  2. Should Abortion be banned?

    Other religions have a wide variety of views on the topic, but it varies with the individuals' opinion. The Church of England for example, says that they "combine strong opposition to abortion with recognition that there can be strictly limited conditions under which it may be morally preferable to any available alternative."

  1. Should conscription be banned?

    people that died, and the number of people that are probably traumatized for life. Now think, if conscription was introduced earlier, this might not have happened. My aunt was in London on that day, and heard the bomb in the underground go off.

  2. Argumentative Essay about Why Smoking Should be Banned

    ?It takes about 18 months to 10 years for cigarette butts to decompose? (McLaren). It would make it easier for trash to keep on piling up, making the world a dirtier place.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work