• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should We Have A Citizenship Test? The citizenship test was introduced by the Australian Government fairly recently.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The citizenship test was introduced by the Australian Government fairly recently. As a western country, Australia is currently the most recent developed western country to have a citizenship test. However, there is a current debate being held on why is the citizenship test held for and what is the government really testing? According to the SBS news site, the Australian Government has now changed some of the content that is to be tested in the citizenship test and states that "would-be new Australian citizens will be quizzed on their understanding of their civic duty and ...read more.

Middle

The test was also made to give the new-comers a view on what is it mean to be Australian and what Australian values are? ,while stating all this information in a book that the participants would need to read. In my opinion, I do not think that this is a worthwhile test as a test can't possibly test whether the people sitting for it actually believe and practice these values but will only test their ability to memorize and learn facts and information out of a book. ...read more.

Conclusion

This test is also a waste of time as the people sitting the test could use the time that was spent on taking the test and preparing for it on work and practicing 'Australian values' to help Australia's community and economy. We have seen both sides of the argument here and to some others who may feel strongly for or against this issue, we can see that the Australian Government is trying its best to please the masses and that it looks like the citizenship test is here to stay for the long run. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

This is a Writing to Argue task. And the candidate attempts to make a decent argument though there are fundamental failures with their answer. Whilst they make a good case and the first paragraph of their essay is akin to ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This is a Writing to Argue task. And the candidate attempts to make a decent argument though there are fundamental failures with their answer. Whilst they make a good case and the first paragraph of their essay is akin to something one might expect to find in an actual newspaper article, the candidate's argument techniques don't follow up in the second paragraph. Their is not a sufficient use of arguing skills, linguistic or rhetoric, by which the candidate could form a good argument. Use of metaphor, exaggeration, opinion-as-fact and voice of the expert would help to fortify this argument by appearing as more of a factual argument, rather than one that shoots itself in the foot with "In my opinion" - because the candidate explicitly states they are voicing their own opinion, they cannot achieve a high grade due to not basing their argument on more factual groundings.

Level of analysis

The candidate makes a good attempt to argue the validity of the Citizenship Test in Australia, and shows evidence of someone who has carried out extensive research into it's legislative inception and response. However, the argument falls relatively flat after the first paragraph - I would advise against any candidate hoping to write an effective argument to avoid stating "In my opinion" so explicitly because it lays the foundation for a very subjective account - one that would need some very ample statistics and expert voices in order to validate the objectivity good arguments need.

So in conclusion, the candidate would only need to implement more rhetorical devices and create more of a sense of objectivity to bring their grade up, but as it stands, this answer is on track for a strong C grade for GCSE.

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication is excellent as there are no causes for concern with regard to grammar, spelling and punctuation. The candidate's language is proficient and shows the examiner the candidate is confident with their essay structure and writing style.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 21/07/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Animal testing

    A number of people think it is morally right but a large number heavily disagree. Many people see animal testing as morally right because they feel that human life has a greater intrinsic value than that of an animal meaning simply that the life of a human is more important

  2. A Scientist's Responsibilities

    It gives rise to bring up questions such as personal morality, responsibility to science, duty and love of one's country, and responsibility to humanity. Generally speaking, first and foremost, a scientist has a responsibility to explain, in the language of the ordinary world, what he is trying to do, why

  1. Murder on the Orient Express Book Review

    It is unfair, as all the passengers are related to the Armstrong family, and the judgment is totally biased. Is it fair to let people decide Ratchett's fate? Can they murder him, an eye for an eye? Also, no one knows for sure that Ratchett has killed the victim, Daisy Armstrong.

  2. Youth is wasted on the Young Debate

    Good afternoon Ms. O'Sullivan and 9.7 English. I have no doubt that many, if not all, of you have heard the line, 'Youth is wasted on the young.' It is spoken so often that it has become a proverb. It is spoken now with little meaning, only the wistful longing

  1. Should animal testing be banned?

    should be equal, and have to follow the law, however, in many places, this is not the case. For example, in places such as New York, the licensed laboratories are immune to ordinary anticruelty laws. These places are often owned by state universities, city hospitals, or even The United States

  2. Animal Testing

    Small animals, such as rats, are used to determine the side effects of new drugs. After animal tests have proven the safety of new drugs, patients asked to participate in further studies can be assured that they may fare better, and will not do worse than if they were given standard treatment or no treatment.

  1. Coursework B Animal Testing

    illness right so what's the harm in using animals to help us?. Also another reason for animal testing is it may find cures for much more other serious diseases for the future, cures and treatments have been developed to save human lives.

  2. Obesity in Australia speech

    In the last 30 years the weight of an average 8 year old child has nearly doubled to what is was previously.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work