Symbolism in the Great Gatsby

Authors Avatar

Alex Warner

Symbolism in The “Great Gatsby”

The critic Harold Bloom once wrote, "Never has symbolism played such a crucial part in the very foundation of a novel as it does in Scott Fitzgerald's masterpiece, The Great Gatsby."

Essentially the great gatsby appears to be a novel depicting the doomed romance between a man and a woman. However, the main theme of the novel is a completely un-romantic one. Although the novel only takes place over several months, and  only in New York, it serves as a microcosm for the ‘Jazz Age’ of America, and of the famous American Dream.

        Fitzgerald illustrates this time as being one of moral deprivation ( Tom Buchanan’s racism),  as well as a decay in social values, as the characters actions are powered by greed, and the empty pursuit of pleasure ( the promiscuity of Tom, Daisy and Myrtle).  This sort of behaviour was typical of the 1920’s and because of this behaviour ,parties- not dissimiliar to the opulent parties hosted by none other than ‘The Great Gatsby’- were in abundance in this time. These parties were a corruption of ‘The American Dream’ because ‘The Dream’ was no longer about achieving a better life than your parents, however in the eyes of money americans ‘better’ translated to ‘richer’, so the thirst for money depicted in the novel, is symbolic for the attitudes of both men and women in 1920’s America.

Join now!

        Nick explains in chapter 9, that the American Dream was originally about discovery, individualism, and the pursuit of happiness. However it has been changed by the rise of the residents of West egg (the “new money”), and with them came their relaxed social values. This epitomized by Gatsby’s dream of Daisy (the green light) being blocked out by the mist, symbolizing how Gatsby will never be able to get Daisy, as their differing social statuses mean that she is apparently better than him. Nick compares the green bulk of America rising from the ocean to the green light at the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

The Quality of Written Communication is sound. There are no glaring errors in spelling and the use of grammar is consistently accurate enough, though some moments see possible typos trickle through an otherwise sound essay. To sort this, it is imperative all candidates check and re-check for any grammatical errors that may not instantly be identified by a spell-checker.

The Level of Analysis shown here is indicative of a candidate working towards a low/middle A grade. There is evidence of very strong analytical skills in the ability to present more than one sufficiently supported interpretation of a symbol (such as the interpretations of how the American Dream is symbolised, and what the eyes of Dr. Eckleburg come to represent), and each point is made clearly and precisely. The candidate regularly references the text if not by use of explicit quotation then reference to events and themes from the novel - this is effective because is helps the flow of the essay. Quite often essays are prescriptive and follow a very formulaic PEE/C (Point, Evidence & Explanation/Comment) structure, but this variation makes it a far more engaging read that delves to an appropriate level of depth to satisfy the question. I would encourage however, that the candidate not mention themes/motifs/symbols that are not going to be fully analysed as there are no points for simply listing anything of symbolic value (which can be hard, seeing as the novel itself - as the candidate must be fully aware having quoted Harold Bloom - the novel's symbolic resonance is very complex). Listing "the ash heap, Gatsby's silk shirts, the green light, The Eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg, and Gatsby's library" and then going on to only interpret the green light and Dr. Eckleburg's eyes will not win any extra marks. In fact, where this candidate missed a trick is not commenting explicitly on The Valley of Ashes enough - it's a huge symbol and is a primary element of Fitzgerald's inventory to portray the segregation of the classes. Though the candidate will not lose marks here, is may have contributed to a more cohesive essay, which appears to change tack quite obviously in the middle. Again, this is not a huge issue seeing as the quality of the analysis is very good.

This essay responds to the question extremely well. It begins with a powerful opening statement which helms the essay and also displays incentive to conduct external contextual research. It's a very good opener and an interesting variation from the norm for essays like these (little things like this tell the examiner you really care about writing a thoroughly interesting and insightful essay, rather than picking a fairly standard opening statement). Following on from that, there are a number of symbols tackled, and each with well-expressed analysis of how they come to represent what Fitzgerald intended, plus insightful and well-developed ideas about the ambiguity of symbols like the eyes of Dr. T. J. Eckleburg. All in all this is a very strong essay.