• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Textual Integrity in Hamlet

Extracts from this document...


Textual Integrity in Hamlet In order to decide if the textual integrity is essential to the play, one would examine whether the character motivations remain constant with the rest of the other characters present within the play. Their imagery, motives, word choice, and whether the speech seems to fit with Hamlet's overall character. Due to the different contexts of the play (one being the Elizabethan era whilst the other being the present) it is easily arguable from a Elizabethan era viewpoint that the character of Hamlet has done the morally correct thing to society as he has waited to the right moment (when he is aware of Claudius' true actions) to act upon his vengeance for his father. Hamlet has maintained his duty to family and God by not killing himself due to loathing but evening the scores in order to regain his father's worth. On the other hand from a modern day approach the audience feels as though Hamlet should react straight away and kill Claudius. ...read more.


In his third soliloquy he states: "For who would bear... the pangs of despised love... when he himself might his quietus make/with a bare bodkin?" The word "despised" is put as "unrequited" - and thus we are led to believe that Ophelia is the reason behind his suicidal thoughts, not the late King. The mourning of his father is a pseudo veil because he feels as though he cannot sink so low as to kill himself due to a woman. Textual integrity is the notion that the text can stand alone as a piece of work, regardless of the texts paradigms, it's social and theoretical practice and it's ability to be understood without reference. It exists and is understood and although other texts may add meaning to it, they themselves do not make the text. As to whether it means it's ability to be received in a variety of contexts - if you can say it's great because it's a 'whole thing' that would work but it seems pretty vacuous. ...read more.


(Not allowing for different perspectives or interpretations. E.g., a feminist viewpoint, a Marxian viewpoint... a Freudian psychoanalytical reading etc.) A text is not produced by an author, but by readers, who themselves are 'produced' by social and political forces. New perspectives frequently attempt to establish their authority by specialized vocabulary (remember this term!) and extensive appeal to theory. As with all literature we are unable to separate ourselves from our personal interpretation and that of the writers. Works of literature usually lead to various interpretations differing from era to context to experience. Each interpretation of 'Hamlet' brings different elements to the forefront. Without these interpretations of 'Hamlet' one may not be able to feel as though they receive a full understanding of the play and a lack of connection may become a dislike of the play rather than a love for the tragic tale. Shakespeare possibly has his own interpretation of the play. The writer merely sets words to the page; it is our job to make them our own. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Hamlet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a very well written response but it lacks substance as a piece of analysis. The play isn't considered in enough detail and there are too many general points made about the concept of textual integrity.

3 Stars

Marked by teacher Laura Gater 26/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Hamlet essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    What is the importance of the Soliloquies in Hamlet? Do they show any development ...

    4 star(s)

    Claudius but he chooses not to: '...now a is a - praying, And now I'll do't - and so a goes to heaven...' Act 3-3-73/74 The use of caesura in the line displays Hamlet's confused and disturbed mind and demonstrates his uncertainty of his preceding actions at this point.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Is Hamlet a coward or someone driven by his conscience?

    4 star(s)

    Also in this act Hamlet destroys his relationship with women furthermore when he confronts Ophelia he tells her, 'Get thee to a nunnery.' As if to call her a prostitute, however Hamlet could be telling her this to get her to seek refuge and save her from the corruption in the society around them.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How do Hamlet's Soliloquies reveal his Changing thoughts and Moods throughout the play?

    4 star(s)

    Especially the way, even when u read them, they make u spit them out. It is though they are disgusting, poisoned, and almost shameful. These words are said as hamlet is questioning about how he does nothing to avenge his father.

  2. How successful is Hamlet as a play about revenge? Consider both the modern and ...

    Even after the ghost is confirmed to be correct though, he still continues to delay the murder. In Act three, Scene three Hamlet has the perfect opportunity to kill Claudius yet he decides not to, on the grounds that, "A villain kills my father, and for that/ I, his sole son, do this same villain send/To heaven."

  1. How does Hamlet's character develop during the play?

    But equally he is breaking the moral code of the time that states that blood must be revenged by blood.

  2. Mighty opposites; Hamlet and Claudius.

    I'll have prepared him achalice for the nonce...by chance escape your venomed stuck our purpose may held there''. Claudius manipulates Laertes by bringing on the matter of his father's death and getting him to take revenge. ''Laertes, was your father dear to you?

  1. Claudius soliloquy Hamlet

    However, another interpretation is that his hand is cursed therefore; it was not his fault for the murder. Furthermore, Claudius to an extent abrogates his responsibility by blaming the society. He generalized his guilt, making it universal. By doing this, he is simply saying that he has only done what he had because of the corrupted society.

  2. Compare and contrast how Shakespeare and Marlowe explore attitudes to death and the afterlife ...

    Hamlet pities the "poor ghost" who has to experience "sulph'rous and tormenting flames". In Doctor Faustus, hell is viewed negatively: it is described as "ugly hell" with "adders and serpents" coming to plague Faustus and the devil is horrifying, threatening "to tear [him] in pieces".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work