Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The battle of the Somme - This analysis is to debate whether or not the battle should have been fought using the sources and information given.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Battle of the Somme Began on the first of july 1916, historians have been debating for years on whether or not it should have been fought. This analysis is to debate whether or not the battle should have been fought using the sources and information given. Source A is an extract of comments made by Jack Cousins on atelevision interview years after the war. "You'll find the barbed wire infront of the German trenches blown away." However it had just been thrown about and got tangled even more. This source is fairly reliable and it is determined by this statement. This source gives the impression that the battle should not have been fought because as Jack Cousins stated "wrong information" was given, so the battle was wrong as soldiers were not fully prepared for the things they faced. Source B was written by a historian, B.H Liddle Hart, for a book in 1972. This source is from endless research and interviews. "German machine gunners had perfected to a three minute drill " because the first day didn't go well, this statement is also fairly reliable and the source is written by a historian, this gives its more reliablity. However this source again shows the battle should not have been fought as Germans had better weapons and could use them affectively as the British had poor and obsolete weaponry which makes it unfair and a one sided battle. ...read more.

Middle

In this quote he is really optimistic about it all because the war is still going on he has to protect the nation from the truth. This source is reliable because it has come from Lloyd George but it is not reliable because the war is still going on and he has to le to stop uproar throughout the nation. So this source states that everthing is good but this is not true but his statement agrees that the battle should have been fought because everything is going well and it is helping to gain a better prospective of winning the war. Source H is also a another statement made by Lloyd George but, after his fall from Prime Minister. A statement from his book published 1933-39. This source states how bad it actually was and Lloyd George's opinion of it all had changed, he talks about " it is claimed that the Battle of the Somme destroyed the old German army by killing off its best officers and men." " It killed off far more of our best." This statement is very reliable as he does not have to lie anymore because the war is over and he is not Prime Minister anymore so he can say what he likes. So this source agrees that the battle should not have been fought as it went really bad for the British and many good men were killed. ...read more.

Conclusion

" Entente worked their way further into German lines" this statment is in comparison to all three objectives, because if the Entente worked their way into German lines it was wearing down the enemy so more men would have to be sent there, thus relieving pressure on Verdun and stopping the further transfer of troops. This Source is reliable as it came from a German. This source also agrees that the battle should have been fought because again it played a great part in the eventual defeat of Germany. Source N are the figures of men lost on the first day and the total losses by the end of the battle. 1st July 1916, "19,420 British killed, " by the end of the battle in total of all sides " 1,070,000 dead." The battle only lasted for 5 months and so many lives were lost in such a short space of time. This source is reliable as they are official figures, this source agrees that the battle shoud not have been fought as so many men lost their lives in the short amount of time of 5 months. In conclusion from analysing thoroughly the sources and information provided it would seem that the morgority of the sources would agree that the battle should not have been fought for various reasons. However a final descision will never be made as there are so many points to be analysed and discussed. No-one will ever come to a conclusion because everyone has different opinions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Gunga Din Analysis

    4 star(s)

    Gunga Din is fighting with a British regiment who are in combat with the Indian resistance, shouldn't Gunga Din, a native Indian, be fighting with the Indian side? Is he just fighting with the British to earn a wage, or maybe he has enlisted to raise awareness of his culture within the British ranks?

  2. Why did William win at the Battle of Hastings?

    Heavy rain would have made the ground slippery and William's cavalry would never have been able to get anywhere near to Harold's army at the top of the steep hill. The archers who proved to be very important could not have shot their arrows straight in the rain.

  1. Why Did So Many Men die in the Battle of the Somme?

    Private G.S. Young who was in the battle Source D When the English came at us, it seemed that we could not stop them, but then we saw that they were walking. We had never seen that before. I saw one officer walking out in front with his stick.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Training was shortened even further as the battle intensified until new pilots began to arrive for operations having had only hours of training. Such inexperience would show in the air and would also reflect in the numbers of RAF losses.

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    This newspaper also says what people wanted to hear as a way of boosting morale and improving preparation for a long-term war. Newspapers written at this time were probably under close surveillance from the government and edited articles that discredited Churchill's leadership or Britain's war effort.

  2. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

    This shows a sign of tragedy as the soldiers believed they could walk across "kicking a football" when really they were walking into there own death. They would then conquer German trenches without any confrontation from German soldiers. In reality the seven-day bombardment did not actually cause any destruction to

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Zealanders and Canadians-they were bolstered by the arrival of fresh Czechoslovakian and Polish squadrons. In addition there were other nationals, including Free French, Belgian and even a Palestinian pilot serving amongst the squadrons. The RAF at least had the advantage of fighting over home territory.

  2. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    are beating the Nazis easily with very little casualties. The poster shows that the morale in the R.A.F. is positive the government produced the poster to encourage people to join the R.A.F. The strengths of the poster are that it is based on facts. The poster is primary evidence and is a very persuasive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work