Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The battle of the Somme - This analysis is to debate whether or not the battle should have been fought using the sources and information given.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Battle of the Somme Began on the first of july 1916, historians have been debating for years on whether or not it should have been fought. This analysis is to debate whether or not the battle should have been fought using the sources and information given. Source A is an extract of comments made by Jack Cousins on atelevision interview years after the war. "You'll find the barbed wire infront of the German trenches blown away." However it had just been thrown about and got tangled even more. This source is fairly reliable and it is determined by this statement. This source gives the impression that the battle should not have been fought because as Jack Cousins stated "wrong information" was given, so the battle was wrong as soldiers were not fully prepared for the things they faced. Source B was written by a historian, B.H Liddle Hart, for a book in 1972. This source is from endless research and interviews. "German machine gunners had perfected to a three minute drill " because the first day didn't go well, this statement is also fairly reliable and the source is written by a historian, this gives its more reliablity. However this source again shows the battle should not have been fought as Germans had better weapons and could use them affectively as the British had poor and obsolete weaponry which makes it unfair and a one sided battle. ...read more.

Middle

In this quote he is really optimistic about it all because the war is still going on he has to protect the nation from the truth. This source is reliable because it has come from Lloyd George but it is not reliable because the war is still going on and he has to le to stop uproar throughout the nation. So this source states that everthing is good but this is not true but his statement agrees that the battle should have been fought because everything is going well and it is helping to gain a better prospective of winning the war. Source H is also a another statement made by Lloyd George but, after his fall from Prime Minister. A statement from his book published 1933-39. This source states how bad it actually was and Lloyd George's opinion of it all had changed, he talks about " it is claimed that the Battle of the Somme destroyed the old German army by killing off its best officers and men." " It killed off far more of our best." This statement is very reliable as he does not have to lie anymore because the war is over and he is not Prime Minister anymore so he can say what he likes. So this source agrees that the battle should not have been fought as it went really bad for the British and many good men were killed. ...read more.

Conclusion

" Entente worked their way further into German lines" this statment is in comparison to all three objectives, because if the Entente worked their way into German lines it was wearing down the enemy so more men would have to be sent there, thus relieving pressure on Verdun and stopping the further transfer of troops. This Source is reliable as it came from a German. This source also agrees that the battle should have been fought because again it played a great part in the eventual defeat of Germany. Source N are the figures of men lost on the first day and the total losses by the end of the battle. 1st July 1916, "19,420 British killed, " by the end of the battle in total of all sides " 1,070,000 dead." The battle only lasted for 5 months and so many lives were lost in such a short space of time. This source is reliable as they are official figures, this source agrees that the battle shoud not have been fought as so many men lost their lives in the short amount of time of 5 months. In conclusion from analysing thoroughly the sources and information provided it would seem that the morgority of the sources would agree that the battle should not have been fought for various reasons. However a final descision will never be made as there are so many points to be analysed and discussed. No-one will ever come to a conclusion because everyone has different opinions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Gunga Din Analysis

    4 star(s)

    Gunga Din is fighting with a British regiment who are in combat with the Indian resistance, shouldn't Gunga Din, a native Indian, be fighting with the Indian side? Is he just fighting with the British to earn a wage, or maybe he has enlisted to raise awareness of his culture within the British ranks?

  2. Why did William win at the Battle of Hastings?

    Heavy rain would have made the ground slippery and William's cavalry would never have been able to get anywhere near to Harold's army at the top of the steep hill. The archers who proved to be very important could not have shot their arrows straight in the rain.

  1. Why Did So Many Men die in the Battle of the Somme?

    This meant that they climbed out of the trenches and advanced across 'No mans land' towards the enemy trenches. On their backs the men carried their personal kits including clothing, and weapons which weighed at least 28 kilograms. They advanced over ground, which had been churned up by previous attacks and artillery bombardment.

  2. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    shows his genuine sadness for all the people that died during the battle of Britain. He is a respected historian therefore he should be relied upon not to be biased. He also has the benefit of hindsight; he can actually put the battle of Britain into perspective.

  1. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as a great military ...

    The German troops and weapons were therefore able to survive artillery attacks and emerge relatively unharmed." Foolishly, the British believed these bombs had destroyed German trenches and killed most of the Germans. Haig confidently said, " There will not be a rat alive in the German trenches once were done".

  2. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

    Haig's first stage of attack would be a seven-day bombardment of the German trenches. This apparently would eliminate all Germans and the British would be able to walk no mans unopposed, in an orderly fashion.

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    The source is biased as it omits key objectives - such as gaining land, looking at source I we can tell this did happen. Haig was known for his "break-through" tactics, which opposed his assistant's attrition methods; Haig's true plans are made clear in this source.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    At the time the Battle of Britain took place, the German Luftwaffe had the best-trained and most experienced fighters in the world. Germany had been training 800 new pilots a month while Britain had been training only 200. Prior to the Battle of Britain the pilots of the Luftwaffe had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work