• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Battle of the Somme was a complete waste of Time………………

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Battle of the Somme was a complete waste of Time.................. I disagree, although the loss of life in the Somme was tremendous, I don't think the Somme was a complete waste of time. It did accomplish its original aims - relieving the French at Ver Dun, pushing the Germans back. The Battle of the Somme started on July the first of 1916 at 7:30 am. It was the idea of a man called Sir Douglas Hague. It was formulated with the goal of relieving the French at Ver Dun. Ver Dun was an area that held great significance to the French and they would defend it no matter what. Hague thought that if the British were to attack a point on the German lines then they would draw troops to defend it, draw troops from Ver Dun, relieving the French and giving them a chance to recover and regroup. ...read more.

Middle

The idea was that because each time it would hit a few feet in front of the last shot it would not miss any thing. This works well in theory, but the problem came when the initial aim was out. More often than not the gun would hit no-mans land, making huge craters that would fill with water and be large enough to drown a man. Also the shots would often hit a few feet either side of the barbed wire, not actually destroying it. Finally, and probably most importantly, is that the artillery didn't kill nearly as many enemy soldiers as it was supposed to. This was because the Germans had much better trenches than the Brits, with much deeper, concrete covered dugouts, which when the shelling started, they climbed into and didn't come out of for a week. ...read more.

Conclusion

Of coarse it was not all bad. Firstly, the battle gave the British a chance it use the tank for the first time and although it wasn't entirely successful this time it was later used to great affect and still is now. Also the Somme allowed the British to gain a total of 10 km into what was previously German space. Also, although the British losses were great the German losses were still considerably higher in the end. In conclusion, I think the battle of the Somme was not a complete waste of life. I believe there were a lot of casualties - more than there should have been but it did help us to win the war in the end. I do believe however that if the plan had been more 'fine tuned' then the campaign would have been eve more successful for fewer lives lost. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as a great military ...

    Our artillery hadn't made any impact on those barbed wire entanglements. The result was we never got anywhere near the Germans. Our lads were mown down. They were just simply slaughtered." I think this quote really puts the battle into prospective and add to the fact that it is a

  2. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

    Verdun was also the reason that Haig was forced to launch his attack forward by three months. If he would have commenced his attack in the autumn when the tanks will have arrived in substantial numbers to have an impact then maybe the Somme would not have been viewed as such a great catastrophe for the British.

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    Ferro is dismissive of the Generals due to his Marxist beliefs. This source was written in 1969 at the height of public opinion against WWI, by popular belief it was dismissed as futile and it is not until the last decade have we truly recognised the need for WWI.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Training new pilots at that time took almost a year, and the RAF was still regarded as something of an old boys club. Things did begin to change following what happened in France, but with the Battle of Britain looming, there simply was not time to train pilots properly.

  1. Britain and the Western Front.

    This new plan of attack created minor gains, with a gain of 25Km length and 6Km width of land, totalling British casualties of 420,000, a costly consequence for the minor territory gained. This fact is the main subject surrounding the "Lions led by Donkeys" statement, as the poor tactics planned

  2. The Fight of A Life Time Between The Two Saiyans

    Kakarot's power has had increased dramatically, one year ago he had trouble beating Raditz and now he is just toying with Vegeta. It doesn't make sense, how could of his power have increased that much in one year. No one had heard of anyone increasing their power that much in one year.

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Britain's airspace was divided up into Groups. 10 Group defended Wales and the West Country and was commanded by Air Vice-Marshal Sir Christopher Quintin Brand. 11 Group covered the southeast of England and the critical approaches to London and was commanded by Air Vice-Marshal Keith Park.

  2. The Battle of the Somme, 1st July 1916.

    The bombardment began on June 24th 1916 and was originally planned to last for five days. This was later changed and extended by two days so the attack would begin on July 1st. The Barrage artillery was not as heavy as it first appeared.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work