The changing tradition of war poetry

Authors Avatar

The changing tradition of war poetry

Before World War 1 war was described as a good thing and that it was sweet, good and honourable to die for your country. The soldiers were compared to knights and heroes. Even if they died in war they still died as a hero to the country and died a glorious death. If you didn’t fight for your country then you were see as a coward and a traitor to your country. You would also become a hero when you return.

There were lots of recruiting posters saying “your country needs you”. These posters would make you feel guilty and you would feel isolated if you didn’t join war. Also these posters would say what your future would be like if you didn’t fight for your country. Also your children would think of you as a brave and honourable man. But if you didn’t and your children asked you one day what you did at war you would be very ashamed of what to tell them.

Some of the poems were written by women who had no experience of war. Most of them were written by generals in charge of the armies. They were educated and could read and write. Before war very few poems were written by soldiers who experienced war. These poems were inaccurate in showing the realties of war.  

They thought that war would end by Christmas but they were wrong as it carried on for four years. The soldier’s attitudes changed as war progressed because they thought it was like a game and that they didn’t think they came home with lots of injuries, nut they were wrong.

As they experienced more and more, they found out that it wasn’t like a game and that it was nothing to be proud of. They became very against it and didn’t think anyone should go through it when it ended. Therefore, the poems written reflected the changing traditions of war.

The overall recruitment message at the start of war was you must go and fight for your country or you were labelled as a coward and your country would be ashamed of you. This encourages them to go as they wanted to be brave and become a hero.

“Who’s for the game?” is a recruiting poem persuading people to join the army. It was written at the start of World War 1 and was compared to a game which was full of fun and adventure. This encouraged young man to join because war was described as “fun” and like a “game” so the men thought it would be a laugh. This poem was written by a woman who has no experience of war and this also not going to show the realities of war as it was written by a woman.  

The subject matter for “who’s for the game?” is a poem which is comparing a football to war. She is showing the positive things in detail and the negative things in less detail and makes war sound “fun” and “exciting”. The tone is very friendly and encouraging to distract the reader’s attention from the harsh realities of war.

This poem has a regular stanzaic structure with four stanzas and four lines in each. The poet has done this on purpose because she wants to keep a sense of similarity. This is also to make it short and simple to appeal more to the readers. This poem also has a syllable pattern, end stop lines and an alternate rhyme.

Repeated rhetorical questions are being used throughout the poem. “Who give his country a hand?” Rhetorical questions are being used to make the reader think about war and to persuade them to join the army and question themselves why not joining war. This makes the reader feel like he will be a coward if he stays at home and the other young man are fighting. It also makes the reader involved without realising.

This poem has a strong rhythm and rhymes so it can be easily put into music and sing along to it.

A metaphor has been used throughout the poem “who’s for the game”. This implies that the metaphor has been used to describe war being fun and full of adventure.

Also an active verb has been used in the poem “grip” and “tackle” are being used in the poem. This is because to describe war as a rugby game to make war sound fun and adventurous.

Additionally personification is being used. “Your country is up to her neck in a fight and she’s looking and calling for you”

The poet has used personification as she wants the reader to feel guilty she describes Britain as “she” as she wants to give an image of counting on young men to fight for her. This is quite striking because it stands out as the poet makes it sound like young men are the only one who can save her as well as protect her.

In the first stanza, the poet gives a repetition of “game”. This is used as this makes it easy to remember and to understand so the message is passed on. Also it would encourage people to join war. It has a positive picture of war so it could persuade people to join the army.

“Fall in” is another example of a recruiting poem. The poem has 4 stanzas. They are regular stanzaic structure with four stanzas and eight lines in each. This poem also has rhetorical questions to make the soldiers join the war.

Te subject matter for “fall in” is the poet doesn’t mention any injuries as this would make a negative response to war. The tone of the poem is positive as he is trying to persuade young men to join war. The rhythm is continuous like soldiers marching and makes the reader emphasise the bravery and courage.  

The first stanza talks about how you would be if you didn’t join war with any girls and that you would be unwanted. Also it makes reader feel guilty if not joining the army.  In the second stanza is shows that what you will tell your children, so it encourages the reader to sign up and doesn’t want to feel like a coward when explaining to their children.

In the third stanza is suggests what would happen if you didn’t go to war that you would be labelled as a coward.

In the last stanza, the tone gets serious and it starts talking about your home.

The rhyme I have noticed is an “AB” rhyme because it makes it easy to remember so the message is passed on. Also there is a rhyming scheme in the poem as well because every other line rhymes.

There is a lot repetition in the poem “fall in”.

“What will you lack sonny what will you lack” the repetition is done for emphasis on the reader and he addresses the reader involved. Also it is repeated as it sounds like an old man having a conversation with another man. It makes the reader imagine an old man persuading a younger person to go to war. It is also an example of colloquial language.

The poet wants the reader to feel guilty and ashamed if you don’t go to war. “Where will you look when they give you a glance?” This quote tells the reader that if you didn’t go to war you will suffer in the future as you would be ashamed and guilty to tell your children what you did at war.

Join now!

The word “slink” describes how he leaves the conversation. Also a metaphor is used to describe the word “slink”. If you didn’t go to war you would be unwanted also it would persuade people to go to war and would want to be left out.

This poem persuades people to go to war by describing that you would feel guilty and be ashamed if you didn’t go to war and that you would feel lonely and left out.

The tone of this poem is very friendly and encouraging to persuade the reader to join the army.

...

This is a preview of the whole essay