• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

The Crimean War.

Extracts from this document...


The Crimean War. 'At no time had the allied position in the Crimea been so clearly defined, or seemed so precarious, as when the Russian artillery with infantry support opened a ferocious and determined attack upon the Turkish redoubts, no more than two or three miles from the town of Balaclava.'1 This statement sums up the British position on the 25th October 1854. The allies had been marching towards the naval town of Sevastopol, on the Crimean peninsular, a place strategically important to both the allies and their Russian opponents. However their position on a valley so close to the Russian fortresses, left them open to the surprise attack they finally suffered, as well as leaving the allies in a communications hole, without proper supplies or any real 'next step plans'. In short the allies were sitting ducks.2 They had bombarded the Russians since the 17th October with relentless daytime attacks on strategic sights, and in an attempt to drive the allies away the Russian forces settled on a surprise attack.3 Although the Russians 'won' the battle in terms of casualties, the allied position was actually strengthened by the capture of Russian artillery pieces, the nature of the attack, had made the allies less inclined to 'sleep on the job', and their movement towards Sevestapol increased. So although the contemporaries at the time saw that the battle was a defeat, with the gift of hindsight modern historians can see that Balaclava was a triumph for the allies, in their continued supremacy during the Crimean War. The British started by making successful movements against the Russians early in the day. Although the Russians made the first significant move, the British had beaten them back, and by 12 o'clock many officers believed the battle won, however the British fortunes changed and the Russians inflicted a sufficient number of casualties to cripple the allies. Here is when the historical debate enters, with the British displaced and badly crushed, the Russians could easily have bombarded the British with further attacks, and perhaps even won the war. ...read more.


It is also interesting to note that after the Napoleonic wars, 300000 thousand soldiers were demobilised and sent back to their parishes, however after the Crimean war, Palmerston kept his peace-time army, at over 215000.26 The British army The 'Charge of the Light Brigade' was indicative of the legendary discipline of the British Army but also the lack of tactical grasp which beset the joint Anglo-French campaign.27 The twenty years of Anglo-French war was still in the minds of the British army, and their unlikely partnership with the French, rubbed against the grain, of officers who had been trained with Napoleonic hostility still in mind. The same battle orders and general plans had been used since the Napoleonic wars. A division of infantrymen usually held up to 5280 men and two batteries of artillery, and a cavalry division usually held 2800 men, and one troop of horse artillery. This was known as a winning combination. On the battle field at Balaclava there were two cavalry divisions the Light-Brigade and The Heavy Brigade, who were fatally jealous of each other, and refused to let one take preference over the other in battle.28 The Heavy Brigade's successes earlier in the day may have led to a jealous show of strength which led to the tragic 'Charge of the Light Brigade'. Much more successful than the Cavalry however, was the infantry divisions, later to become known as 'the thin red line' after their heroic stance against the Russian cavalry.29 Although not containing a large amount of men, each Division spread itself the length of the Russian Cavalry attack, and shot deep into the wave horses, both startling the horses, and dismounting their riders. Unlike the Russian Redoubts, during the British cavalry charges, the British troops were trained to stand still when faced with a cavalry charge, and instead of being cut down like the Russians they managed to repel the Russian cavalry. ...read more.


Baring Pemberton 3 The Crimean War, Denis Judd 4 The times 13.11.1854, The attack on Balaclava 5 http://www.hargreave-mawson.demon.co.uk/cwrs.html 6 Trevor Royle Crimea, The Great Crimean War 1854-1856 7 Charge! Hurrah! Hurrah! A life of Cardigan of Balaclava, Donald Thomas 8 The World of Guns, Richard Akehurst 9 Battles of the Crimean War, W. Baring Pemberton 10 Trevor Royle Crimea, The Great Crimean War 1854-1856 11 Battles of the Crimean war, W. Baring Pemberton 12 The Russian empire 1801-1917 Hugh Seton-Watson 13 Russia 1800-1914 Problems, Issues, Sources, Skills, Philip Cummins 14 The end of Imperial Russia 1855-1917, Peter Waldron P124 15 Calthorpe Crimean Texts. 16 Russia 1800-1914 Problems, Issues, Sources, Skills, Philip Cummins 17 It is well documented that The Lords, Raglan, Cardigan, and Lucan had an on going feud. 18 Hodasvich, P.89 and P.178 (Trevor Royle) 19 Trevor Royle Crimea The great Crimean war 1854-1856, P.262 20 Battles of the Crimean War, W. Baring Pemberton 21 Trevor Royle 22 The Crimean Texts, The Times Articles. 23 Alfred, Lord Tennyson, The Charge of the light Brigade, 1854 24 Eric J Evans The forging of the modern state. 25 Eric J Evans The forging of the modern state 26 Nation-making in nineteenth Century Europe, WG Shreeves 27 The forging of the modern state, Eric J. Evans, P.351 28 http://www.geocities.com/Broadway/Alley/5443/crimopen.htm 29 History of the British Army, Charles Messenger 30 Richard Akehurst, The World of Guns. 31 Richard Akehurst, The world of Guns. 32 The History of the British Army, Charles Messenger 33 Alfred, Lord Tennyson, The Charge of the Light Brigade 34 Europe since Napoleon, David Thompson 35 The Times 4.11.1854 36 The Times, 24th January 1855 37 Russia 1800-1914 Problems, Issues, Sources, Skills, Philip Cummins 38 The origins of the Crimean War, David M. Goldfrank. 39 Letters From headquarters, by Lt-Col SJG Calthorpe, Extract- The Battle of Balaclava 40 Russia 1800-1914 Problems, Issues, Sources, Skills, Philip Cummins 41 Reasons for the Russian hesitations during the battle 42 Reasons for the Russian hesitations during the battle 43 Calthorpe Crimean Texts. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. charge of the light brigade essay

    The path that the Light Brigade charged into the jaws of death, the mouth of hell showing repeatability which is used to

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    The rate of British plane production was good - the only weakness of the RAF was the fact that they lacked sufficient trained and experienced pilots. Trained pilots had been killed in the war in France and they had not been replaced.

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    It is very similar to the propaganda posters in its aims, especially since it is trying to involve more people in the war (i.e. More pilots, America). This was published when things were not looking very good from a British perspective, and is not a newspaper to satisfy readers, but more to satisfy the Governments ideas.

  2. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

    These are the reasons that I believe made poor planning the main reason for the battle of the Somme to be regarded as such a big military cataclysm. I believe that poor planning is a good main structure for a causal web as it links to many things such as pal battalions for example.

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Following the grinding battles of the 18th, exhaustion and the weather reduced operations for most of a week, allowing the Luftwaffe to review their performance. The "Hardest Day" had sounded the end for the Ju 87 Stuka dive-bomber in the campaign.

  2. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    Bits of information maybe omitted or exaggerated. The newsreel is biased towards Britain, it only shows Luftwaffer planes being shot down and omits R.A.F. planes crashing. Interpretation 5. Is an article extracted from "The Daily Express" August 13th 1940. The article would have been edited before it went on sale

  1. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    interpretations from the end stages of the war and after the war. Finally I will conclude with my own interpretation of the Battle of Britain. Part 1 Why was the popular interpretation and why did it become so quickly established during the early part of the war?

  2. Battle of Britain.

    The message conveys the evilness of Nazism and how this magnificent battle will determine the outcome of the war, and it's the brave few who made the greatest sacrifice. The obvious reasons for this message is for propaganda use, to encourage war effort at such a crucial period, to boost

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work