• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Crucible Act 3

Extracts from this document...


The Crucible Act 3 Examine the dramatic devices by which Miller sustains our interest during the long trial scene Arthur Miller manages to capture and hold the audience in the long scene using a variety of techniques which keep us at the edge of our seats waiting for the next burst of excitement or conflict in the trial. Some of these techniques include the noise in the courtroom, the order in which people speak, the tone of their voice and even silences in the scene. What is interesting in the scene is how some of the character's true personalities stand out and how some of the characters develop through the scene. Miller also manages to make us become attached to some characters because of the noble and good deeds they do while he also makes some characters seem less appealing because of the acts they do in the scene. From the beginning the judges are clearly a well educated and experienced bunch as they easily manage to turn around one of Martha Corey's statements against her. Martha Corey: "I am innocent to a witch. I know not what a witch is." Judge Hawthorne: "How do you know, then, that you are not a witch?" Then in the middle of the hearing for Martha Corey, Giles Corey, her husband, comes storming in to the courtroom exclaiming that he has evidence for the court. This easily manages to capture our attention as Giles interrupts the ever so confident and powerful judges. When Giles calls out that everyone is hearing lies from the court, "A roaring goes up from the people." The court audience react in a way that makes us believe that what Giles is doing is not exactly usual and is an extremely bold move as the court is a very powerful group of people who are control of everything at the moment. When Giles enters the courts and gets the judge's attention, Paris tries to sway the way the judges think about Giles because he is not friends with him. ...read more.


When Giles continues to refuse the name of the man who heard Putnam commit the crime, Giles is arrested for with-holding evidence and contempt of the court which is ridiculous because he is just trying to protect an innocent man who is trying to stay out of trouble and does not have the confidence to face the court. Hale knows this and tries to tell the judge but Danforth sticks by the books and demands the name of the man, which is not delivered. Hale's switched allegiance away from the court is confirmed and Danforth also realizes it, taking offence from it. "In God's name sir, stop her; send him home and let him come back again with a lawyer-" but Danforth butts in: "Mr Hale, you surely do not doubt my justice...Mr Hale, believe me; for a man of such terrible learning you are most bewildered." Again Danforth shows how protective he is of his court and how he believes that he is never wrong and anyone who disagrees with him is wrong, or in Mr Hale's case, bewildered. In questioning Mary, Danforth uses very abrasive methods which clearly intimidate her. He tells her that whether she was lying or if she is lying now, she will go to jail for perjury. Danforth tries to test Mary by making her pretend that there is a spirit in the room and faint, because that is what her and the other girls have been doing the entire time; pretending to faint without seeing any spirits. But Mary can not do it, claiming that she could do it before because she heard the other girls screaming so she 'thought' she saw them, but really didn't. Then out of thin air, the girls start to go very cold, claiming that there is a cold wind running through the room, a shadow wind sent by Mary. This action shows how ruthless they are in their accusations because they so easily turned on Mary, even though they were very good friends with her until very recently. ...read more.


Miller easy conveys the trouble problem of this in the situation, partly helped by his own experience. Miller was once rightly accused of attending communist meetings, which in the U.S. at the time, was against the law. Although attend was all he did he had to go into court with his back against the wall. In court he was intimidated by the judges and was offered a possibility of reducing his jail time or erasing it all together. He was told that if he gave in the names of other people who also attended communist meetings he would get off lighter. But, Miller, being the honest and caring man he is, decided to not give the names of others who attended the meetings, but instead decided to take full force of his punishment. This is extremely similar to the situation that Giles Corey managed to get himself into in. He knew that he couldn't give the name of the person who overheard Putnam telling his daughter to accuse Martha Corey because he knew that the man would most likely end up in jail because Putnam was in a higher social class, therefore better protected from the law. Because h did not give in the name he was arrested and later executed after being crushed to death by slabs of stone which were being used as a torture method to get the name from Giles. But he was loyal to the man and got his own life taken instead. Although Miller might not have had to pay with his death, he still received a jail sentence rather then getting it shortened or maybe even erased. He also knows how it feels to be used because the judges knew he couldn't get out of the situation he was in so decided to pressure him for the names. The Crucible was a great example of the former corruption of major justice systems which now has the saying for any trial, 'Innocent Until Proven Guilty', instead of the other way round. ?? ?? ?? ?? James Lynch . Lynch, James C Millfield School 63437 29/09/2006 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. The Crucible - analysing acts 3 and 4.

    Secondly, it has a metaphorical meaning: the society of Salem is being heated and stirred in an attempt to remove the impurities and leave only the pure members of the society. One of the central themes of the play is the spiritual development of John Proctor.

  2. John Proctor is found in the center of all the action in The Crucible.

    Elizabeth works her way around answering it by setting the time and scene of the situation. She mentions how she was sick and how John is never drunk and such things that do not pertain to the question that Danforth had asked of her.

  1. How does Miller use the development of characters and their interaction with others to ...

    Committee on Un-American Activities", were able to draw upon the mass hysteria surrounding the communist threat and as a result, knowingly wrongly accuse any person causing a threat to their attempts to further escalate the fear and hysteria amongst the public or their own along with their and position amongst society and peers.

  2. The crucible, God in heaven what is John Proctor?

    A sense of separation arises." When Proctor and Elizabeth argue it becomes clear that Elizabeth still has not forgiven him. By saying, "You will not judge me more, Elizabeth", Proctor shows that he is tired of being judged by Elizabeth. The line is a command so he is again demonstrating his power by telling her what to do.

  1. Explain what happens in Act 3 and show how Arthur Miller makes it clear ...

    Danforth starts to relax slightly after this and take it more slowly. Miller has made the audience see from this that Danforth does not have anything to hide but he is trying hard not to let it rock the court too much as it is such a large question.

  2. In Act 3 of 'The Crucible', how are Dramatic Devices and Events Used by ...

    at the hypocrisy and absurd nature of the trials, through his angry and indignant delivery of lines. The events in Act 3 also highlight the religious hypocrisy, such as when Parris uses the parable of Cane and Abel to accuse Proctor.

  1. "The Crucible" as a piece of drama is structurally flawed. It reaches a climax ...

    Contention make him weep." Parris, who used to be confident and was one of the more powerful and influential people in Salem is now frightened to go out at night "I dare not step outside at night!" he says since he discovered a dagger "Tonight, when I open my door to leave my house- a dagger clattered to the ground".

  2. How Does Miller use dramatic devices and effects in Act 3 of 'The Crucible' ...

    In the play, Parris is keen to keep his family in secret about the dancing of the girls in the forest. But he cannot do it in the circumstances that follow. The author has shown that Abigail's power and control over the girls.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work