• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Crucible as a piece of drama is structurally flawed. It reaches a climax is the trial scene and subsequently loses momentum. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


""The Crucible" as a piece of drama is structurally flawed. It reaches a climax is the trial scene and subsequently loses momentum. Discuss." In terms of events, Act 3 is the most dramatic scene of "The Crucible." This is because in Act 3, the play's events spiral out of control, as the hysteria and momentum increase, so does the climax. Whereas, in Act 4, it is four months later and so it loses momentum as such a large space of time has elapsed. Also in this scene, the false confession that John Proctor makes isn't as dramatic as the honest confession of adultery in the previous act. This is because the adultery confession is a personal secret of John's, whereas the confession about binding himself to the Devil's service is a lie and he only confesses it to save his life. Also in Act 4, the play loses some of its major characters but we only hear of them going, we don't see it happening; therefore, that dramatic moment is absent from the play. There is some drama in Act 4 but it is a personal drama between John and Elizabeth and not an exciting drama that will entice the audience. The amount of injustice in Act 3 is crucial to the play. Although there are some examples of injustice in Act 4, they're not as dramatic as the injustices in Act 3. The start of the injustices in Act 3 begins with Martha Corey's trial in the court. ...read more.


He believes that it is better to lie and live than to die for something that is untrue. He is acting to try and prevent innocent deaths. The painful nature of truth is a major theme in this play and we find this out when, in Act 3, Elizabeth's only lie is the lie that condemns her husband to death. We are told by Proctor that Elizabeth "will never lie." John confesses to adultery and says that Elizabeth knew about the affair. However, when she is questioned before the court Danforth asks: "Is your husband a lecher?" She replies faintly, "No, sir," to save her husband's name. This is the climax of the play as we are led to believe that Elizabeth would tell the truth as she never lies, however she doesn't. John Proctor's motives for dying are numerous. Firstly, he is willing to die for the truth. Secondly, he wants to save his name. In doing so he has regained his love for Elizabeth and even though it is too late for him at least he died having made up with his wife. He described himself as a "fraud" because he knows he has done wrong. He believes that if he was to be classed as a "saint" when he dies it would be a lie. Also, he believes that the townspeople will be worshipping him for something he has done wrong, even though they don't know it. There are many characters that change and develop in the play. An example of one of them is Hale. ...read more.


"Will John confess?" and "Who has confessed and who has died?" These questions are important to the end of the play because if they were left unanswered the play wouldn't be structurally complete. The impact of John's death helps the characters that change come to terms with their new character and those who haven't realise that their morals are wrong. Take Hale, for example, he realises in Act 3 that the morals of the court are wrong and in Act 4 when John dies because he won't confess Hale pleads with Elizabeth: "Woman plead with him." He realises that Proctor is dying for the wrong reasons. Also Parris, who is a selfish man, also pleads with her: "Go to him, Goody Proctor. Go to him." This is probably because he realises that he was selfish. He also realises that the reason for John Proctor's death is because his niece was an adulteress. In conclusion, even though John Proctor dies, it is him, not Danforth, who wins a moral victory. John Proctor died for the truth and for the love of his wife and children but Danforth believes that John Proctor died because he had lied and wouldn't confess to doing the Devil's service. This shows us that John Proctor was the better person; he also knew the girls were false and pretending. However, Danforth chose to believe immoral, little girls who thought sentencing people to death was fun. Act 3 is still the most dramatic; however, Act 4 was closer and more personal. This is because the tension and amount of events that occur in Act 3 is more theatrical than Act 4. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Crucible confession

    Just before Proctor sits down to dinner with Elizabeth he re-seasons the stew without her knowing. This symbolizes many different things about the Proctors. Firstly I think the seasoning of the stew symbolises the couple marriage. I think it shows the audience the lack of heat, passion and 'seasoning' that the couple seems to have between them.

  2. Examine miller's presentation of the marriage of John and Elizabeth proctor in the crucible. ...

    They both started up because of the selfishness of others. If Joseph McCarthy was not so selfish then the people that he accused would have had a job, and they would not have been shunned by the community. If the two girls were not so selfish then 19 people would have their lives back.

  1. The Crucible Act 3

    an accusation against Putnam that he made his daughter cry witch against his wife because he wants Giles' land. When Danforth asks for the name of the supposedly honest man who heard Putnam talk to his daughter about accusing Martha Corey, Giles says he can not give him the name because that innocent will then go to jail.

  2. The Crucible - analysing acts 3 and 4.

    important, he wants to show he is a heroic man, so he says he never has see the Devil, which is true, and the audience see how he is a better man, and is going to die being an honourable and a heroic man.

  1. "How Are Truth and Lies Conveyed in 'The Crucible'?"

    The court wished to investigate this affair and John informs them that Elizabeth is aware of it, so they ask her to enter the courtroom and testify. However, she is not aware that he has confessed and she is told not to make eye contact with either John or Abigail.

  2. 20th century drama- The Crucible

    Wipe it out of mind. We never touched Abbey." This means that he wishes them both to forget about the whole regrettable incident. The incident was not forgotten however, and contributed to his downfall. Their relationship is open and honest, however, any love between the two is merely one sided and provided by the deliriously jealous Abbey.

  1. Drama GCSE (1699) Unit 2 Drama Exploration 2 - Response section

    The image, when Proctor stood tall and opposes Danforth, helped me understand something very important: Proctor is the hero of the play. Proctor chooses to die then make his friends die pointlessly. Proctor's sacrifice: condemning himself to death instead of letting his friends die in vain.

  2. John Proctor is the tragic hero of "The Crucible". Discuss

    When Proctor was just about to sign the paper and confess to something he didn?t do he stop his self. Proctor stated ?How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name? he then realized that he would rather die and everybody to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work