• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Crucible by Arthur Miller - John Proctor.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Crucible by Arthur Miller - John Proctor The writer, Arthur Miller, wrote the crucible in 1953. Miller was born in New York on October 17th, 1915, and he has influenced the Broadway stage for several decades. Miller's plays usually deal with contemporary political and moral issues. He began writing plays whilst he was at the university of Michigan, where many of his dramatisations were awarded with prizes, for example, in 1937 one of his plays received an annual award. With first successes ('All my sons' and 'Death of a salesman'), Miller condemned the American idea of prosperity because he thought that only few could reach this without moral compromises. In The Crucible, he writes about the colonial witch hunts in Salem and implies a parallel to the investigation into communists in the McCarthy era. Throughout the 1940s and 1950s, a young senator (Joseph McCarthy) was very concerned about communism in Eastern Europe and China. Because of his concerns, McCarthy accused more than 200 American citizens of being communists that had infiltrated the American government. Many people had their passport cancelled or were even jailed for refusing to give the names of other communists. During this time, there were few people in the press, who were willing to stand up to McCarthy and the anti-Communist 'machine', but comedian 'Mort Sahl and journalist Edward R. Murrow stood against McCarthy and helped to eventually get him removed from power. Arthur Miller, along with another 300 artists was blacklisted as communist sympathisers. This period of time is what made Miller decide to write a new tale on a parallel with the communist trials. ...read more.

Middle

Proctor: "It does, sir, it does; and it tells me that a minister may pray to God without he have golden candlesticks upon the altar." Hale: "What candlesticks?" Proctor: "................. But Parris came, and for twenty week he preach nothin' but golden candlesticks until he had them. I labour the earth from dawn of day to blink of night, and I tell you true, when I look to heaven and see my money glaring at his elbows - it hurt my prayer, sir, it hurt my prayer" etc Soon after the above declaration Hale questions the fact that only two of Proctors children are baptised, once again it is the fact that if he wanted his third and youngest child to be baptised, then it would have to be Parris who performed the service. This is something that Proctor does not want. This shows just how much Proctor does not like Parris if he will not even let him touch him in order to baptise him; Proctor: "I like it not that Mr. Parris should lay his hand upon my baby. I see no light of God in that man. I'll not conceal it." From this judgement, Proctor shows the reader that he does not trust Mr Parris from the start of the play. This could develop throughout the play. Proctor is willing to isolate himself from the church in order to prove his point. It is this that brings disapproval from others and gives his enemies a reason for charging him with witchcraft. ...read more.

Conclusion

during this meeting Proctor was trying to get Abigail to leave him alone, I think that deep down he still feels guilty about this. Elizabeth and Proctors relationship improves, when she is arrested for witchcraft, as Proctor focuses completely on trying to save his wife: Proctor: "I will bring you home. I will bring you soon." Elizabeth: "Oh, John, bring me soon!" Proctor: "I will fall like an ocean on that court! Fear nothing, Elizabeth." By the end of the play Proctor and Elizabeth's relationship is completely saved, as she now respects him for admitting to adultery and for dying to save the family name: Elizabeth: "[supporting herself against collapse, grips the bars of the window, and with a cry] He have his goodness now. God forbid I take it from him." Also by the end of the play I think that not only has Elizabeth forgiven Proctor for his affair, but also he has finally forgiven himself, which was the one thing that could not do: Proctor: "You have made your magic now, for now I do think I see some shred of goodness in John Proctor. Not enough to weave a banner with, but white enough to keep it from such dogs." I think Proctor definitely changed because if he hadn't changed in the slightest, then I don't believe that he would have given his life up on principal and to save his name. He would have just signed the document. If you ask me my opinion, I say Proctors change of heart was a good change, that turned him into the hero of The Crucible, without a doubt! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is John Proctor a good man?

    4 star(s)

    Proctor has a great loathing for hypocrisy, and, here, he judges his own hypocrisy no less harshly than that of others. We can also learn a lot about proctor here in the way that he and Elizabeth relate to each other after Elizabeth discovers proctors lie.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the relationship between John Proctor and Abigail Williams and how Arthur Miller presents ...

    4 star(s)

    The whole thing has spiralled out of control. I suspect Miller withdrew this scene because it undermines the power of the following Act. We are expecting John to have been to the court and dealt with the situation. We expect sense to have prevailed and so therefore when it has

  1. How Does Arthur Miller Present The Characters of Abigail and Elizabeth and Shape Our ...

    The last line of the play is spoken by Elizabeth after John's death, 'He have his goodness now. God forbid I take it from him!' This distressing line from a heartbroken Elizabeth makes Miller show his audience juts how strong both Elizabeth's love for John and Elizabeth is at the hardest part of the play for Elizabeth.

  2. How much is John Proctor responsible for his own death.

    Religion is another contributing factor to Proctors death, as Salem is quite sacramentally run .You are judged if you are not a follower of the faith, which today would be frowned at. Pride and religion link together as; if Proctor didn't have as much self-esteem, would he be civil to the clergy men and have an advantage in the situation?

  1. Is John Proctor a Good Man in Arthur Miller's Crucible?

    dishonest, he allows Elizabeth to make a false interpretation and furthermore the reasoning for making his wife happy which is due to his affair just shows that he feels guilty. Later in the Act, Elizabeth wants to mention Abigail to John without him thinking that she is accusing him of

  2. To what extent can John Proctor be described as a tragic hero in Arthur ...

    Together, however, all four only serve to achieve destruction of that which they are supposed to uphold. With the exception of Hale, they are more character types than characters, serving as symbolic representatives of the corrupted social order. Proctors conflict with these characters can be perceived as heroic, for it

  1. "Examine the changes that John Proctor and Reverend Hale go through as the play ...

    Life, woman, life is God's most precious gift; no principle, however glorious, may justify the taking of it..." After contributing to the death of the first few people persecuted, he realizes how precious life is and the value of life, it cannot be wasted.

  2. "The Crucible" - John Proctor says, "I'll tell you what's walking Salem, vengeance is ...

    if "someone rose to shut the door without first asking his permission." Between the very start of the play and the very end, there is quite a change in Samuel Parris' character so our feelings towards him change also. As a member of an audience first watching the play, I

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work