"The Crucible" - John Proctor says, "I'll tell you what's walking Salem, vengeance is walking Salem." Discuss the real evil in Salem, who contributed to it and their motives who do you blame the most?

Authors Avatar

“The Crucible” – Assignment 1

John Proctor says, “I’ll tell you what’s walking Salem, vengeance is walking Salem.” Discuss the real evil in Salem, who contributed to it and their motives who do you blame the most?

Before I begin to tell you my opinion on who was to blame, and my reasoning for saying so, I will give you a brief insight into the real point of Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible. Arthur Miller first produced his play in 1953, in the middle of the McCarthy political ‘witch-hunt’, although the story had applied for playwright for many years prior to this. This meant that the play was seen as a political parable – it represented the goings on in actual political life.

   

Since 1938, an organisation had existed in America called the House Un-American Activities Committee with the right to investigate any movement, or anyone who seemed to put at risk America’s safety. The chairman of this was Senator Joseph McCarthy. Under his rule, the committee became paranoid in its search for people who sympathised with communists.

   

Almost any criticism of the government or its instructions was seen, in the eyes of McCarthy, as an admission of devotion or loyalty to communism beliefs. Witnesses were made to appear in court and answer charges that they were sympathisers of communist followers, and made to name others that they saw at these meetings which took place as long as twenty years ago. Liberal writers, film directors and actors all appeared before the committee and, as a result, many of them found it hard to find future work in the American theatre or film industry.

   

In 1956, when the committee’s power finally began to deteriorate, Arthur Miller was summoned. He was asked to confess to signing his name to a list of petitions that had been produced with his signature.

   

Miller, in his mind, began to link the activities of the Committee with the witchcraft trials, which had taken place in Salem, an American town, two centuries ago. For example, the Committee often had possession of lists of people seen at various meetings, yet they still wanted the witnesses to name names. Miller related these public confessions to those that confessed to witchcraft, and falsely accused others, in Salem.

   

In his autobiography, Timebends, Arthur Miller tells us that he had known about the witchcraft experience from as far back as his college days but it had remained in his mind. It was not until a copy of Marion Starkey’s book The Devil In Massachusetts fell into his hands that he got the idea for his play, The Crucible.

   

In Salem, Massachusetts, 1692, a group of young girls experimented with the supernatural world and, as a result, the jails were filled with men and women, and twenty people were hanged. To understand why this happened, we have to remember that the people of Salem believed in witches and the devil and that the bible instructed them to hang witches.

   

The girls’ antics were encouraged by a West Indian slave, Tituba, with her spells and beliefs. A more serious threat was the intervention of Mrs Putnam, of whom seven children had died on the night of their birth. She had sent her surviving daughter, Ruth, to Tituba to discover the cause of her children’s deaths, as she did not want to admit to the possibility that she might be at fault.

   

After having been caught by her father, Betty Parris, daughter of Salem’s minister, became ‘possessed’ and would fall in and out of trances, and on occasion, crawl around the floor alongside her cousin Abigail Williams.

In court, overcome with hysteria, the girls falsely accused people of witchcraft and then claimed that those same people were possessing them within the courtroom walls. However, people were not suspicious as it was believed that the only witnesses to the witchcraft were the girls and those accused. The people of Salem thought the girls too innocent to be capable of such corruption.

   

If people did not confess to trafficking with the devil, they were hanged. In Salem, there was no choice of individuality. Anyone who did not wish to abide by the society’s rules was seen as being ‘against the society’, alias, a witch.

   

In naming people, the girls were probably projecting their own guilt onto others.

In this assignment, “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller I am going to explore the whole situation to discover from where I think the evil came from. In order to do this, I am going to need to analyse some of the characters and state how much I think they contributed to the real evil in Salem.

Firstly there is Samuel Parris. He is a very memorable character. Throughout the play, his character comes across as nasty, cold and cunning but underneath that bold exterior we see that he is an insecure and cowardly man who is easily intimidated by those of higher power in order to achieve what he believes to be a high status. Because of this, and the fact that he is widowed and has never been able to care for children, anyone who has read the play will find Parris unfit to be a father to his only daughter Betty, let alone be a minister of Salem.

   

Due to his insecurity, Parris is paranoid that whatever he does, or wherever he goes he is being judged, as Arthur Miller states in his introduction, “He believed he was being persecuted wherever he went, despite his best efforts to win people and God to his side.” As he thinks of himself as a man of importance to the ordinary people of Salem, because he is a minister of Salem, he is over-sensitive and easily offended, even if “someone rose to shut the door without first asking his permission.”

Join now!

   

Between the very start of the play and the very end, there is quite a change in Samuel Parris’ character so our feelings towards him change also. As a member of an audience first watching the play, I would have no idea of the characteristics of Parris, which are described above, so when Parris first appears I am not biased towards him, and, in fact pity him as he kneels helplessly at the bedside of his daughter, although this feeling does not last long.

   

We can see through Parris’ actions throughout the play that he is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay