• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Crucible - What is the dramatic impact of the character of Danforth in the Crucible? How does Miller use him in the play?

Extracts from this document...


The Crucible What is the dramatic impact of the character of Danforth in the Crucible? How does Miller use him in the play? The Crucible was written by Arthur Miller as an allegory. He wrote the Crucible at a time during a modern day witch-hunt. The witch-hunt was in the USA and was hunting communists. In 1956 Miller him self was accused of being a communist and he was brought before the house of un-American activities committee. He was found guilty in the communist beliefs. Many of Millers friend's were persecuted and being attacked for being communists, which they were not. Later in 1957 the decision was over ruled, Miller then went on to marry Marilyn Monroe but sadly divorced in 1961. In the Crucible Miller portrays the good, the bad and the evil of Salem, a small village in Massachusetts. He shows that even the most religious people can make huge, costly mistakes. Miller shows this through the actions and the words of the characters. The Crucible is told from third person point of view. The characters don't address the audience directly but obviously address each other directly. The Crucible is set in the late 17th century during the time where a series of mad witch-hunts were taking place. It is about a small minority of girls that claim that they have taken part in witchcraft activates. Because of these accusations the small town begin to search madly for these so-called witches. ...read more.


Danforth comes across in the play as being a hard man, and one not willing to change his views. He is also a prominent character in the play and one of the main judges that prosecute those accused of witchcraft. He is in charge of hearing all evidence against people, and judging them on his final conclusions. The fact that he doesn't let any one of those accused off, unless they confess, creates the impression that he a valiant man of his word and a hard man with little sympathy or any other kinder human traits. In act three is the first mentioning of Danforth. Miller includes notes about some of the characters in stage directions, and those notes of Danforth give us an instant impression about him. Miller writes; 'Danforth is a grave man in his sixties, of some humour and sophistication, that does not, however interfere with an exact loyalty to his position and his cause.' Danforth seems to criticise those who do not attend church regularly, as he is a highly religious man; he even brings religion into his arguments a lot. He seems to have lot more respect for those who he thinks are 'good Christians' who uphold and lead a Christian lifestyle. Danforth: "you are in all respect a gospel Christian?" Proctor: "I am, sir" Danforth: "such a Christian that will not come to church but once a month?" ...read more.


Another theme, which links us to Danforth, is his pride. He obviously has a lot of pride. He thinks of himself as a good Christian and has a lot of belief in his own personal power. He sees ant challenge on the court as an attack, therefore an attack on him. He refuses to hear defences against those accused, by whoever is trying to defend a so-called 'witch'. I think that Danforth realises that he has being wrong in some stages, because when Mary Warren challenges the truth of the accusations, he listens and probably has doubts about the charges against Goody Proctor, and later on Proctor. This shows how he does not withdraw his decision already made, as it would prove him wrong in an earlier act. He does this because he doesn't want to show any weakness or give other people the satisfaction that they have won a battle against him. Usually when people's lives are at stake a fairer trail is given. Danforth stays to his word and doesn't feel he can let anyone off any charges for which other have already been punished for. Surly a judge who believes in justice and follows a strong religion would rather lose his good reputation rather than the lives of many of innocent people? Danforth obviously does not feel this way and now shows remorse at the end of the play as he says: "let them hang high over the town. Those who weep for these weep for corruption." This shows Danforth staying to his beliefs and decisions and feels no mercy for those who were executed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. The Crucible - summary.

    Miller presents the play with traditional theatrical devices, relying on the dialogue and situations to illustrate his themes, but finds these somewhat insufficient; in the first act the play therefore contains a number of historical digressions that reveal the motivations of each character and which cannot be accurately conveyed through a strict stage interpretation.

  2. The Crucible.

    When Mary is told this she simply cries that she is with God repeatedly and then sobs. At this point the other girls accusing people of witchcraft enter the courtroom. There will have been tension in the audience as Danforth has been questioning Mary and they may have felt that

  1. Why Did Arthur Miller Call His Play 'The Crucible'?

    So the reader's first perception of John Proctor is not 'good'. This character is untrustworthy because he had an affair and he committed the greatest sin, adultery. We disliked him because of what he said to Abigail, which was 'Child-' 'How dare you call me child!'

  2. The crucible.

    apparently she "flew" and it does not take long for the town, to gain knowledge of this and many of the town residents have to see what the commotion is about. This shows how the town is relatively close and involved with one another and how if any bad rumours

  1. The Crucible.

    The timeless power relationship between men and women is revealed and problematised through the relationship between the characters John and Elizabeth Proctor. In Acts One and Two, John Proctor appears to be the superior of the two, and therefore the inequalities and male dominance of the male-female power relationship are revealed.

  2. Free essay

    How successful is The Crucible as an allegory?

    In both Salem and America suspicion was rife. Everyone had ideas on who was either communist or a witch, friends suspected friends, family suspected family and spouses suspected spouses, 'Still an everlasting funeral marches round your heart. I cannot speak but I am doubted, every moment judged for lies, as though I come into a court when I come into this house!'

  1. The Crucible - Power and Manipulation

    "I- I know not. A wind, a cold wind, has come." (Her eyes fall on Mary Warren) Mary: (Terrified, pleading) "Abby!" Abigail: (Shivering visibly) "It is a wind, a wind!" Mary: Abby, don't do that! However when she realises that her efforts are pointless and she would be much better

  2. How does Miller use the concept of witchcraft for dramatic effect and to expose ...

    What will be the outcome?" This in itself already presents the audience with the key battle of the play: The battle between truth and lies. By this it brings the two main protagonists together- John Proctor Vs Abigail Williams. Reverend Parris has knowledge of what happened at the woods, he

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work